this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2025
78 points (98.8% liked)

politics

26683 readers
3156 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Oval Office meeting between Mamdani and Trump last month turned heads, with some observers stunned at what a warm reception the right-wing Republican president gave to the democratic socialist mayor-to-be. But in New York City, this wasn't so surprising to Rodriguez. And he wasn't alone.

NBC News exit polling from the November vote showed 9% of 2024 Trump voters who showed up at the polls backed Mamdani, a phenomenon highlighted by one voter's "MAGA for Mamdani" T-shirt that went viral in the run-up to Election Day. Trump himself was fascinated by the development, citing the statistic to reporters following his meeting with Mamdani.

"A lot of my voters actually voted for" Mamdani, Trump said. "One in 10, and I'm OK with that."

Mamdani and his allies see their success winning over a segment of Trump voters as a sign of how other Democrats can win back parts of the electorate that spurned the party for Trump in 2024, including young men and immigrants who felt the party was unresponsive to their needs. But Republicans who spoke to NBC News said that while they were surprised by both the number of Trump-Mamdani voters and the congeniality of the president's meeting with the mayor-elect, they did not feel as if Mamdani unlocked a road map to reconfigure the electorate.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zak@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The underlying theme is dissatisfaction with the political establishment.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

100%

It's like sitting in the middle of a crowded ER bleeding out and begging for help while 2 doctors argue with each other about the proper protocol they should proceed with before they even begin to stop the bleeding.

A patient could escape from the psych ward, walk by and just point out how fucked up the situation is, and you would probably be grateful somebody is at least willing to acknowledge reality and trust him more than either doctor.

[–] JaymesRS@piefed.world 36 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Aka: No politics, just vibes.

[–] WhiteRabbit@lemmy.today 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Most people don’t know politics. They just vote for who they’d rather have a beer with. Vibes

[–] velindora@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think they meant the politicians themselves.

[–] JaymesRS@piefed.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nope, the voters. They couldn’t care less about the policies, they just vote based on the vibes of the candidates.

[–] velindora@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 days ago

Well, The politicians too

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes and no. This ultimately a desire for their elected representatives to just fucking do something, and both Trump and Mamdani promised to do things that will make their lives better. Obviously one of these is a grift, but that's beside the point.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And yet this lesson will be completely lost to established DNC, and they will learn the wrong lesson again and move further to the right.

Meanwhile we'll get another Trump who promises Great Things whereas Democrats will promise to keep things the same.

We desperately need a new political party that can push people who want change to vote progressive.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 5 points 2 days ago

Realistically, there are two possible explanations for why the Democrats are so stubbornly useless:

  1. It's a big club and you ain't in it.

  2. You can't get a man to understand something when his salary depends on not understanding it.

Either way the idea that they could "learn" anything fundamentally misunderstands why they do what they do. Their job isn't to get into power; it's to make sure you don't get into power.

[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 days ago

Populist is hat Mandant is good

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 21 points 2 days ago

Mamdani and his allies see their success winning over a segment of Trump voters as a sign of how other Democrats can win back parts of the electorate that spurned the party for Trump in 2024, including young men and immigrants who felt the party was unresponsive to their needs. But Republicans who spoke to NBC News said that while they were surprised by both the number of Trump-Mamdani voters and the congeniality of the president’s meeting with the mayor-elect, they did not feel as if Mamdani unlocked a road map to reconfigure the electorate.

Republicans: no no no no, Democrats don't try this!!! Trust me bro I'm totally looking out for you. Don't try this. Keep moving to the right, keep chasing our voters I swear it will work next time! Don't give up now! (Hehehe suckers...)

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 8 points 2 days ago

Unexpected but not surprising in hindsight. This has been how that worked for a while now.