Why does a building inspector even have the ability to define a column as decorative or not? Surely thats already in the initial building plans? Shouldn’t the inspector be working off existing plans rather than being able to declare any structural element as decorative?
this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
131 points (99.2% liked)
News
23320 readers
3358 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Not sure how correct this is, but as an engineer, their word may be trusted enough for higher level decision makers not to have to go back to the materials the engineer should have seen. The engineer must not have done their due diligence or just come to the wrong conclusions.
If you're suggesting that there be more double-checking and verification, then I totally agree.
an engineer, their word may be trusted enough
That's what happens here. This person was a Professional Engineer, a kind of certified engineer. Their job is to determine if stuff is safe for use.
Things like roads, bridges, pressure vessels, and apartment buildings all have a Professional Engineer (PE) look over their designs at some point. Their job is to use their expertise to determine if the thing can do it's job safely.
Existing structures are also periodically inspected by PEs. Like the above person, they determine if the thing can continue to do its job safely.
Unlike other engineers (in the USA), PEs have to attain a certification. You need to take an exam and maintain a license. It takes a lot of time and effort to obtain these things.
Shouldn’t the inspector be working off existing plans rather than being able to declare any structural element as decorative?
As someone else mentioned, the building is old enough that the initial plans likely no longer exist.
It's the job of the PE to make judgment calls like "is this column structural or decorative". This person fucked that up. Losing their license and ability to practice would be a fitting punishment.
When PEs fuck up, lots of people can die.
Just a note: it isn't enough to just pass a test, you have to use the olds boy network to even sit for it. Then everyone pretends it is some great mystery why there is a lack of diversity.
The building is almost a century old. I am unaware if the plans would still be available.
Do you know if they are?
Are places not digitizing blueprints? Like as soon as scanners and computers became a thing that should've been the first thing they started doing. That just seems like common sense
Depends on how old the building is. Does it sound like common sense? Yes.but there's the reality of how long it takes to digitize plans and also to check are said plans accurate and do they still exist?
Most likely they are. I have done drafting to bridges where the plans were over 100 years old. Those things are around for a loong tine
Bridges are public sector.
it suggests a cover-up for some reason.. the inspector noticed damage to the critical element, but chose to label it as decorative so that maintenance wasn't required.. perhaps the building owner got involved..
Given what I have seen dealing with PEs I am surprised this doesn't happen all the time. Maybe two in my life I have dealt with that can do more than have a meeting about nothing or put something in a spreadsheet that was put together by an intern 8 years ago.
Shout-out to the outstanding minds at Jacobs, Parsons, and Koch. Defrauding the taxpayer and looking well dressed.