this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2025
21 points (95.7% liked)

Privacy

44268 readers
260 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Some people say it's really privacy-giving and that you should use it as a privacy alternative. Others say it's alao on the big tech side. What's going on with telegram, really?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Alvaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 days ago

The only reason people think it is private is because for a long time it refused to corporate with governments (which is why plenty of criminal activity happens there)

It is about the least private option of all modern messaging apps (literally not e2ee, which means that the server owners have potentially full access to all chat content)

The only thing that makes it special is the bot support.

[–] Undertaker@feddit.org 51 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Some people obviously do not know what they are talking about. Telegram stores clear text chat messages on their servers. That's not even near privacy

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

stores clear text chat messages on their servers.

Does it really?

[–] spinning_disk_engineer@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

By default, yes. It is possible to create a so-called secret chat, which is standard for signal and similar, but that's something you have to manually do. Furthermore, it's not even possible to make secret chats for groups. When it was initially released, I was cautiously optimistic that it could turn into a good, secure application, but knowing it's been this long and it hasn't, I wouldn't consider that likely.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SrMono@feddit.org 17 points 3 weeks ago

https://www.messenger-matrix.de/messenger-matrix-en.html

Take a look at the comparison and judge for yourself.

[–] peskypry@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

Every text you send through Telegram is stored in plaintext. Telegram and authorities can access that without your knowledge. Also it will get leaked in a breach someday.

Now you decide for yourself if it's private.

[–] MeowerMisfit817@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Woah, thanks.

What should I use, then? Because, from what I seen, Signal is US hosted, and this isn't very good to privacy.

[–] teolan@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Signal is well designed enough that Jurisdiction doesn't matter much. The only things you'll find that can br arguably better than signal are fully decentralized apps that go over TOR like Briar or Simplex but these have a lot less usage because they're so slow and terrible for your battery.

[–] MeowerMisfit817@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So, no Whatsapp alternative? Sorry, I'm kinda slow.

[–] teolan@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If you don't understand the cryptography enough that you have to ask about telegram, just use Signal. It's the best designed app for the security of most people, it doesn't have any privacy/security footgun, and has a pretty good threat model while not cutting corners on usability.

[–] MeowerMisfit817@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Oh, thanks.

[–] peskypry@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] artyom@piefed.social 12 points 3 weeks ago

I wouldn't call it "big tech". The biggest problem is that none of the chats are encrypted by default. And even if you do use "secret chats", the encryption there doesn't seem to be up to PAR with modern standards.

The creator previously refused to comply with warrants but since he was jailed in France, that's pretty much over.

A good messenger is unable to comply, by design, because it simply does not store the data that these govts are after.

[–] onlooker@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 weeks ago

Telegram talks a pretty big privacy game, but consider that the feature that actually enables end-to-end encryption, called "Secret Chats" in the app, is OFF by default. Couple that with everything else said in this thread and you start to see a picture forming. And it's not pretty.

[–] Catalyst_A@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 weeks ago

Use Forkgram off of F-Droid. Its an open source app with extra features. You have to have the regular app to verify the login on forkgram. Then just uninstall the regular app. I only use it for news channels and mod'd app channels. I don't use it for communications. Its not good for that.

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It probably has worse privacy than e-mail or IRC, because it has the same level of encryption (transport encryption only, i.e. Telegram LLC can read your messages), but it also requires a phone number to use, linking your account to your real identity. In short, do not use it for communications if you desire them to be private.

load more comments (2 replies)

All I know is that every scammer under the sun uses it these days

[–] anon5621@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago

It was much better in the past in years 2017 ,now don't use it.they put many limitations to custom clients and still not published source code of server as it was promised

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago

It depends. By default, it uses a weaker encryption than WhatsApp. You can turn on e2e encryption, but not in group chats.

On the other hand, it has multiple FOSS clients, will work on pretty much any platform, and has a great UI.

If you want a fairly secure chat app that your grandparents can use, then Telegram is perfect. If you're sending highly confidential stuff, then no.

It's also suitable for project groups, because of the better tools (and moderation bots) available to the mods.

[–] HoleSailor@feddit.org 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

For messaging purpose WhatsApp (if not Signal) is better than Telegram as Telegram chats are not encrypted by default.

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Wrong, we do not control WhatsApp. It fails to include a libre software license text file. Nothing secures our messages from WhatsApp.

[–] HoleSailor@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Neither do we control Telegram. Both TG and WP are notorious. Even after Telegram client's being open-sourced, no one stopped them from sharing user data to Indian Govt. I am not defending WP, but it at least has a mention that chats are by default E2E encrypted. That's why I mentioned "if not Signal".

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

At least Telegram might try to resist. Meta corporation offers your data to highest bidder preemptively

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Telegram allegedly complied with a government to give them user data, and their e2e encryption was switched to be off by default. I know because when I started the chat with someone we raved about how it says 'end to end encrypted' before sending a message. Well, between then and when I decided to migrate off it, that private one-to-one chat's encryption was switched off.

I say it's okay, but only ensure that e2ee is on

[–] deprecateddino@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Even with e2ee, I wouldn't trust it since they use a closed-source, proprietary encryption protocol.

[–] Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

How far they have fallen.. Which would you recommend, sans self-hosting a service? Signal?

[–] deprecateddino@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Signal is easy to on board folks to. Not a huge fan of the phone number requirement, but it's worth the trade off for me. I used Session for a while, but media sharing was buggy. I've heard good things about Simplex, but the inability to have a desktop client was deal breaker for me.

[–] Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, it seems that everything has an imperfection, unfortunately. Just gotta choose one. I'd jump on Signal if they remove the phone number, but like you I think it's the shiniest of the bunch. I just want media with captions, uncompressed uploads, the ability to search messages, full e2ee for calls and messages, the ability to conference call, secure message migration/sync to a new client, emoji/rich text and markdown format support, by a company that promises not to access its users' messages, location or other identifying information.

[–] Szorfein@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Just another application owned by multi miliionaire

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Like being poor makes it okay.

It relies on a service we do not control.

[–] lorski@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago
[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Libre software app, we control it, good.

Relies on a service we do not control, BAD!

[–] DrunkAnRoot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

last time i tried making a acc to see what its like there they wanted me to buy premium

[–] M1k3y@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 weeks ago

Its main "security" feature is that they are uncooperative towards most governments. If a government makes a legally binding request to signal, they recieve IP, Account creation date and other unavoidable stuff and signal is transparent about that. If telegram gets that request, they probably ignore it, but maybe they don't and there is no way to know as a user.

Also telegram is the platform of drug dealers, nazis and conspiracy theorists. So even if it had e2e by default, I would still prefer using another platform.

load more comments
view more: next ›