this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2025
850 points (98.0% liked)

People Twitter

8867 readers
1896 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm locking this. I removed an entire thread of comments because I understand how both sides could think they're right and it's getting reported. No one is banned.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 291 points 3 weeks ago (31 children)

Wait... that doesn't look like the war thunder forums...

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 81 points 3 weeks ago

jokes on her, the intel she’s digging for i leaked on war thunder already

load more comments (30 replies)
[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 157 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The actual last thing you see before leaking state secrets...

[–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 32 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 weeks ago

✊ the struggle is real

[–] JohnAnthony@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 3 weeks ago

"lul not like you losers have any actual clearance"

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 114 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

I already leaked. She just doesn't know.

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 96 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

that actually happened to one of my acquaintances a couple of years ago. hooked up with some girl at drone convention and she got arrested shortly afterwards for spying. he saw none of it - just got informed later on that he was about to get the honeypot treatment due to his work. dude was so scared he went ballistic on his digital footprint and won't even talk to you if there's any mic'ed device in his vicinity. if i ever saw a man "scared shitless" that was it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 73 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

The irony being all the Defense contractors on here that upvoted, saying "heh, boobs do be like that," and there's some website that tracks who votes how on Lemmy, thus revealing a short list of maybes.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

Oh no, I made a terrible mistake and upvoted the post multiple times. Now they'll definitely go after me :(

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] assembly@lemmy.world 66 points 3 weeks ago

She can have them.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 58 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Lies. Last thing you see is a WarThunder forum comment claiming that the radar cross section of a F-22 is about the size of a golfball, and you know for a fact that in most directions, it has a radar cross section comparable with a bumble bee.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 55 points 3 weeks ago

If she thinks I'm not atleast seeing the tiddies before I commit treason she has another thing coming.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 47 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Had a Russian woman way too into me at the bar during RSA. Maybe I was being paranoid but I bailed.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jaschen306@sh.itjust.works 39 points 3 weeks ago

That's weird. That doesn't look like a Signal chat.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 39 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The worst part is when they're girl-next-door natural beauties like this.

Your brain can say no to an obvious escort/Victoria secret model suspect, but when your animal brain starts shutting down your frontal lobe with "Oh my god, she's the one!!" malware you're screwed lmao

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 35 points 3 weeks ago

I'm in the wrong industry.

[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 33 points 3 weeks ago

Sexretary of War

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)
[–] yopyop@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

So this means I can safely date her ? I'm relieved, thanks !

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] OpenPassageways@programming.dev 32 points 3 weeks ago

"SecWarCrimes has invited you to a Signal chat"

[–] _Nico198X_@europe.pub 29 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

what's to stop one from benefiting from the honey pot, but feeding them false information?

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 42 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I used to work for a large defense contractor as a consultant. The best way to damage China would have been to let the spies see everything and hope they implemented the same fucked-up shit over there.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Describe the technical specifics of your job in a way that misleads them as to the actual information you're working with, but that won't be immediately obvious to an expert that's potentially even more familiar with the source material you're working with than you are.

It's just hard to keep that kind of lie going - it's not impossible, but fooling someone with an entire intelligence agency requires a whole lot of both luck and planning.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

apparently counterintel is really hard to do, according to some other lemmy comment i read before somewhere.

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

it is case-dependent. not every honeypot operation is about gaining intelligence. some are just to discredit someone.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 25 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Jokes on her, most of my country's military resources haven't been updated since the Boer War.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Technically I can only break ITAR but they know everything I know already, so fuck it we ball.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Context? And also, would. Totally would. 😍

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

the original honey pot. basically, an attractive person from a geopolitical foe country feigns interest in you (sometimes involves sex) and gets you to divulge secrets that they then pass on to their handlers.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 21 points 3 weeks ago

this has been the most effective espionage since forever

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sparkles@piefed.zip 19 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

It must be difficult dating with that kind of job.

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 31 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I know someone who has a security clearance of some type, I got interviewed about them a few years back. In a rounabout way they said that people who cant talk about work tend to date other people who cant talk about work. Not necessarily in the same field but people who are used to compartmentalising like doctors, lawyers, etc. People who professionally understand "I cant talk about it".

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

And then the twelve colonies are destroyed in a surprise attack.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›