this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2023
268 points (98.6% liked)

News

36292 readers
3979 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.

7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
JonsJava@lemmy.world
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
jeffw@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
rjc@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
268
PFAS 'Forever Chemicals' Found in Freshwater Fish, Yet Most States Don't Warn Residents (www.scientificamerican.com)
submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Staggering amounts of toxic “forever chemicals” have been found in freshwater fish, but there is no federal guidance on what is a safe amount to eat

Bill Eisenman has always fished.

“Growing up, we ate whatever we caught — catfish, carp, freshwater drum,” he said. “That was the only real source of fish in our diet as a family, and we ate a lot of it.”

Today, a branch of the Rouge River runs through Eisenman’s property in a suburb north of Detroit. But in recent years, he has been wary about a group of chemicals known as PFAS, also referred to as “forever chemicals,” which don’t break down quickly in the environment and accumulate in soil, water, fish, and our bodies.

The chemicals have spewed from manufacturing plants and landfills into local ecosystems, polluting surface water and groundwater, and the wildlife living there. And hundreds of military bases have been pinpointed as sources of PFAS chemicals leaching into nearby communities.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If you've been catching fish in a river or lake in the U.S. and eating it in the past 50 years or so, you've already been eating a ton of toxic shit. PFAS are just the icing on the cake. And we've basically saturated our entire generation with PFAS and will continue to do so until companies stop using them.

[–] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 years ago

Companies -- But it's too H A R D to develop anything else!

[–] Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Detroit already has some pretty restrictive fishing limits from pollution: 3-4 sunfish or 1 bass per month

PFAS should be the least of this guy's concerns

[–] antidote101@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Plastics in our fetuses, PFAS in the fish... Smartest species on the planet apparently.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We put lead in gasoline well aware that lead was toxic and knowling fully that lead would come out the tailpipe and it still took us decades to reverse that decision.

[–] PolyLlamaRous@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I find it's helpful to mention what you can do to avoid them and their creation.

Where are PFAS found? Cleaning products. Water-resistant fabrics, such as rain jackets, umbrellas and tents. Grease-resistant paper. Nonstick cookware. Personal care products, like shampoo, dental floss, nail polish, and eye makeup. Stain-resistant coatings used on carpets, upholstery, and other fabrics.

[–] Chestnut@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Note that it seems to be pretty safe when it's applied to something. The danger is mostly when it's applied/created. The big reason to not buy these products and to look for alternatives is that you're decreasing demand for the products

[–] PolyLlamaRous@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Good point, sorta but not buying prevents it's creation regardless of its safety while being used.

Honest question, what about when it comes off after being applied? Looking at Nonstick pans. They are notably something that flecks off the coating in your food.

Or prolonged direct skin contact from clothing, and then washing that clothing, tent, or other item. Washing it does removes some of PFAS into the water supply.

I don't know about you all, but after cleaning something with water resistance, I end up reapplying it with something like scotch guard. I have no idea how many cans of scotch guard I've used (I love outdoor activities). Never used gloves or a mask using that stuff.

[–] Chestnut@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

From my understanding the use is totally safe

I'm told you could eat big chunks of the stuff and it would pass right through you.

PFAS is so carcinogenic that if you WERE getting some of it in your body from this kind of exposure then we'd see really high cancer rates, the same way we do in factories near it. At least, that's my conjecture

Minutes food did a good video on it's safety if you're interested

https://youtu.be/R1hbV3EzOD4?si=zoXdismsEJvZW_9G

[–] guyrocket@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

PFAS is also in drinking water. I don't think there are any standards for levels of it in our water systems in the US.

I want to get a water filter but a good one it's around $300. Not all water filters remove PFAS.

[–] stealthnerd@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I have this which is $113 right now and I think you can catch it for a bit cheaper sometimes. Of course you have to factor in installation costs if you're not comfortable installing it yourself.

It's great though because it makes it easy to use filtered water even for tea, coffee, cooking etc since it's right at hand at the sink.

[–] Zorg@lemmings.world 2 points 2 years ago

Zero water claims to remove all PFAS, and you can get a pitcher for ~$30.

[–] WagnasT@iusearchlinux.fyi 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Friendly reminder to donate blood or plasma regularly. We do need to deal with PFAS, but at least you can reduce the accumulation in your body.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You should do that anyway, but as far as PFAS, the study unfortunately only showed a 30% decrease. I doubt that is enough to avoid the long-term effects.

[–] WagnasT@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 2 years ago

i would not infer that 30% was the limit, that's just the reduction after 1 year of donating every 6 weeks.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

there's microplastics in the rain

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hey, you got rain in my microplastics

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 2 points 2 years ago

my bad g, it's so hard to keep them separated these days

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you are going to eat wild fish, eat smaller ones. They have had less time to bioaccumulate toxins like PFAs, mercury and other heavy metals.

[–] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

Yup. 1-2 lb walleyes make for great eating!

Also, stay away from tuna and salmon (canned or otherwise) cause they're higher on the food chain and accumulate a ton of chemicals. Leave the nigiri and sashimi alone.