this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
268 points (93.5% liked)

Science Memes

17928 readers
2488 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 55 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This has been done too much, I'd like to see a campaign to ban sodium chloride instead.

[–] Encephalotrocity@feddit.online 14 points 1 week ago

+1 Might as well ban saccharides while you're at it.

[–] Evil_Incarnate@sopuli.xyz 38 points 1 week ago

They forgot to add that it has the highest pH rating of any known acid.

[–] SW42@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (3 children)

100% of people consuming it have died. Eventually. That stuff is dangerous!

[–] Tja@programming.dev 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

False. I have consumed it and haven't died.

I might in the future, but haven't died as of today.

[–] SW42@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Tja@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, which doesn't make it true. The "have died eventually" applies to all participants in the battle of Trafalgar. Didn't immediately, but after some time. All dead now.

I've drunk water. I have not died.

[–] SW42@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe. The fact is not everyone who consumed it has died.

[–] SW42@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yes they did - unless you count vampires.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 3 days ago

I'm not a vampire and I didn't die. I expect to, but I definitely haven't died in the past

[–] Iunnrais@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Mind your tenses. Will die, not have died.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

I haven't, and I'm not a vampire.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 5 points 1 week ago

This is not accurate, only 93% has died so far!

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trees also consume it and they can technically live forever

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No they can't, at least not in general. The longest lived, easiest to date, life has been trees, but there's no suggestion that they'll survive climate change

Most trees have live spans in the low hundreds of years

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There is no definitive proof either way. Fact is that they can live a long, long time. The oldest known trees are close to 5000 years old. There's even a clonal system estimated to be 80.000 years old. https://www.bbcearth.com/news/can-trees-really-live-forever

Fact is that a tree is much more likely to die from external factors than from old age. It cannot be proven, but it is certainly not impossible that (some) trees are immortal under the right circumstances.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 2 days ago

We have an eco system in southern Australia that at the moment is eucalyptus trees. They take over all at once after a fire, and they live about 300 years. When they die off rainforest trees and undergrowth take over, until there's a dry period and fire

[–] Setarkus@mander.xyz 24 points 1 week ago

The author of the petition is really looking out for others by not using the unlucky number in the list and taking care of souls for centuries even after their body's gone

by signing this petition, the undersigned agrees and acknowledges that the creator of this petition has legal ownership of my soul for the remainder of my natural life plus 1000 years.

[–] Sequentialsilence@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Everyone knows dihydrogen monoxide is water, they’re not going to ban it. What we need to ban is hydric acid, that’s the most dangerous chemical in the world.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Just saw a post saying mamdani wants Arabic numerals taught in schools and boomers were going crazy over it so.... maybe not everyone..

[–] Aganim@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The world would be even better if we just do away with oxidane!

[–] cepelinas@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

Forgot about americans. /kinda sorta sarcasm.

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Most drowning victims lost their lifes in this stuff! It's dangerous at fuck.

Also one hydrogen is already volatile, just imagine what two of them do!

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I signed this years ago. It still hasn’t been banned???

[–] gigachad@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago

Finally someone is thinking about our children

[–] ClanOfTheOcho@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ever since high school chemistry, I've wondered if it would be more correct to refer to it as hydrogen hydroxide. Yes? No?

My high school teacher called it that!

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Sounds like reduced hydrogen peroxide, I like it.

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

Links gone :/

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Dihydrohen monoxide gave me dihydrohen monoxide tainted pee and my girlfriend died when she drank my pee.