this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2026
1311 points (99.0% liked)

Comic Strips

20954 readers
2375 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 71 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I had this exact same reaction last week when I bought a new toothbrush.

[–] FuyuhikoDate@feddit.org 52 points 6 days ago (4 children)

You had to use your mail for a toothbrush?

Please tell me that you're joking...

[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 47 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Some electric toothbrushes have these gimmicky features where they can map your mouth while you brush and report on your hygiene habits to tell you how effectively you're brushing, or even nag you if you don't brush enough. Guessing that's the kind they have.

So for the manufacturer, why allow the device to simply use a local account to track that information, when instead they can force you to register an account online and associate your brushing habits with all of the other shadowy telemetry data being collected about us online?

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 13 points 6 days ago (3 children)

But also, these aren't hidden features. That info should be on the box. I'm not trying to defend companies demanding your email and an account to use an electric toothbrush, but also at a certain point you gotta look at the consumer and say, you bought that. Electric toothbrushes aren't exactly a monopoly out there; you can buy one that doesn't require an email.

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago

It's pretty easy to put something on the box like this can make your phone buzz if you forget to brush your teeth, and people who worry they're sometimes forgetting to brush your teeth will see that as an advantage without necessarily realising that they need to give the manufacturer their email and the right to associate it with their brushing telemetry.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If it's not prominently displayed on the box, then it's not the consumer's fault.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kiamwhatador@lemmy.world 39 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

The "internet of things" sucks.

[–] 123@programming.dev 29 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Smart local devices rock though. Its not the technology but the implementation for many IoT devices that sucks 🙂

[–] early_riser@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

I have this pipe dream of a noob friendly router/hypervisor/NAS combo that would trivialize the installation and running of server-side apps like nextcloud or home assistant. The reason it's also a router is to automagically forward ports so you could have remote access without ~~someone else's computer~~ the cloud.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 38 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Flying cars was a scifi delusion that didn't consider all the problems that come with it. What would be a more rational "this was predicted and never came about" would be social constructs like safety nets and betterment of society for all, as well as improving our management and use of the Earth. That should make us mad, not that we don't have flying cars buzzing (and falling) in the sky.

It just hit me that we did for flying what we should have done for ground. Make it almost all mass transit.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yeah, screw flying cars and parts falling off them due to disrepair.

The real sci-fi future is trains. Numerous and fast.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Flying cars was a scifi delusion that didn’t consider all the problems that come with it.

Same with living in space. Especially on space boats.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 34 points 6 days ago

That verifying email for everything shit is something else all together. And yes it is true. Like what the fuck man? I am glad my fridge and stove and microwaves are all low-end crap that do the one basic job they are required to do (and they do it very well mind you).

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 32 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's a scientific fact that dads become 69% hotter when they wear a dadbod T-shirt.

Source: my crotch

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

You sure you're not just a furry?

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Absolutely fucking not. LOL. I appreciate and respect the furry community, but I want human dads with human moobs.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I hate that anything smart needs my location to be enabled before it will work even if it's use is unrelated to location. Like my smart light bulbs. Why do they need to know a location ever

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They really don't. Look into home assistant, there's no reason the network packet controlling your light bulb needs to go across the internet at all!

[–] 123@programming.dev 16 points 6 days ago

And stop buying from vendors that don't allow full free local control (Google, etc.)

[–] SeboBear@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

As a rule of thumb those device go straight back for a refund.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] crater2150@feddit.org 5 points 6 days ago

If your bulbs use Bluetooth and your phone is an android, that's because on Android you need location permission to scan for Bluetooth devices (as known Bluetooth beacons in range could give away your location). It's still bad, because you can't know if the app uses that permission for anything else.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] early_riser@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

We really need to make people more aware of how their data gets from A to B. I think most people think you need internet access for anything connected to a network to communicate. If more people realized that if device A is on your LAN and device B is on your LAN, there's no reason traffic from A to B has to traverse the internet, they wouldn't fall for stuff like this.

[–] bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And people think that your need a phone service to use GPS.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 15 points 6 days ago

WE HAVE NOTHING TO LOSE BUT OUR CHAINS

[–] Geodes_n_Gems@lemmy.ml 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 25 points 6 days ago (4 children)

We do have various flying vehicles that have been described as flying cars. But it's fair to say that the Back to the Future II-style mass adoption hasn't happened.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_car

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 43 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm happy with those broadly staying science fiction. People already can't drive in two dimensions. It's worrying to think how awful it'll be if they're ever given a third.

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (4 children)

There are a far fewer pedestrians and walls and lamp posts and motorcycles in the air than on the ground, though, so there's a lot more margin to be awful without endangering anyone other than your own family.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 36 points 6 days ago

At present it takes considerable effort or lack of skill for someone to crash their car through the roof of your house. Once morons can fly, all bets are off.

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Well, a car falling from the sky (car crash or ran out of gas) probably wouldn't be very safe either. I'm absolutely not trusting the average nitwit who pays more attention to Instagram than to the road to operate something akin to a mini-plane.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Yes, but there are still pedestrians and walls and lampposts and motorcycles on the ground. I would imagine accidents would be far more disastrous and dangerous than in 2D.

~Add in people in convertibles who aren’t wearing safety restraints (or a failure of said restraints) if/when the vehicle does a 180° flip (for any reason).~

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 7 points 6 days ago

Add in people in convertibles who aren’t wearing safety restraints (or a failure of said restraints) if/when the vehicle does a 180° flip (for any reason).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Helicopters are basically flying cars.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 8 points 6 days ago

Flying cars costs 10 times as much as a regular car, and are not that great at flying or driving. You need driving and pilot license. Needs to take off from an airport or request special permission. It's just not as practical and cheap as portrayed.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

TBF, flying cars in most sci-fi rely on some kind of crazy convenient anti-gravity tech that allows vehicles to hover while still somehow retaining lateral friction so they don't drift sideways when turning.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Was actually looking at these probe thermometers to give as Christmas presents this year... some brands actually advertise that they connect to nothing and need no phone or account to operate.

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Those are strong selling points that we're all going to be looking out for constantly now.

[–] Stegget@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (6 children)

But we do have flying cars. They're called planes. You can get a license to fly them and everything.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 6 days ago

and the best is when the servers the use to send verification emails are crazy slow so you make a throwaway email (because fuck giving them your email, also handy to track who sells it and who they sell it to), go through their bullshit registration, then nothing. You checked spam even. You think you fucked up, and click resend email, still nothing. You give up and you can’t really use your new thing. Maybe you return it, if you’re smart. Then the next day you finally get the email, which indicates they clearly care about the user experience since they put so many resources into onboarding

[–] Xerxos@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 days ago

You thought they would research how to make life better, while they researched how to get more value from the customer.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›