this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2026
239 points (99.2% liked)

politics

26985 readers
2315 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Before alleging fraud in Minnesota’s Somali community, right-wing YouTuber Nick Shirley built a following with anti-immigrant clips.

The day after Christmas, far-right YouTuber Nick Shirley posted a video claiming to have exposed fraud at Somali-owned day care centers in Minnesota. Portions of the 42-minute video — mostly scenes where Shirley is turned away at the day cares — went viral in conservative circles, catching the attention of the Trump administration, which was already at work targeting Minnesota’s Somali community amid its broader war on immigrants.

The video, which has been viewed more than 2.2 million times on YouTube and millions more on other platforms, sparked a renewed crackdown in Minneapolis, with the Department of Homeland Security announcing on Monday it would visit 30 sites suspected of fraud across the city.

This isn’t the first time the conservative YouTuber has gotten the attention of the Trump administration. Shirley participated in Donald Trump’s “Roundtable on Antifa” in October after an altercation at an anti-ICE protest. At age 23, his videos aren’t merely influencing his audiences — they’re also influencing government action.

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 88 points 3 days ago (3 children)

He also made videos in Kyiv insinuating that the war in Ukraine doesn't exist and that US aid money is going to buy luxury cars for Ukrainians.

When pushed about this in a live video chat, he backpedals, claims he never meant to push that narrative, and conclusively identifies his "reporting" as unserious and satire.

https://youtu.be/VaZYMeYWMic

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Great video. And infuriating. Hard to watch.

These fuckers exist and “influence” people in such bad ways.

[–] texture@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

what video are you referring to? is there a video link behind that new sites email paywall?

[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure he's referring to the video linked in my comment.

You know, the one he's replying to?

Right up there? ☝️

[–] texture@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

thanks, im new to lemmy and brand new to this particular UI. somehow missed that.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

😂 it’s ok. This one https://youtu.be/VaZYMeYWMic Great channel and journalist.

[–] texture@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

thanks, i'll have a look

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I'd love to see a lot of these little fuckers arrested. Benny Johnson ranks very high on my list.

I had to laugh that some of these assholes were all a-quiver over getting "Kirked" in the aftermath of that...it's almost like they KNOW they are pissing off a whole lot of people and suddenly thought - holy shit - you mean I might have to face any consequences at all for the shit I do?

Not that I'm condoning violence mind you, but it was wild to see it suddenly dawn on them that their actions have real consequences, and it might involve more than just getting them money, "owning the libs" and giving Donvict a reach-around. It might involve negative consequences.

Imagine if those negative consequences involve going to fucking prison for their fraudulent bullshit. James O'Queefe taught a generation of even younger dickheads just how to do it, and now they don't even need a platform like Faux to help them....I'd like to see some real consequences for their lies and deception - long prison terms and HUGE, debilitating fines, as well as clawing back all the money they make doing their "influencing".

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 81 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Trump literally stopped all childcare funds to all states over this bullshit.

One fucking racist YouTuber making shit up about Somalis, and now nobody gets any money for childcare.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 42 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Imagine if we could just shitpost some nonsense about an oil company CEO and have a Democratic president just nuke all their subsidies within a day or two

[–] Xander707@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This unironically needs to happen next so that dumbass MAGAs can see why the presidents behavior is…problematic? No no… the phrase I’m looking for escapes me - let’s go with “batshit fucking insane” for now, and come together to put an end to executive overreach.

Which is not to say there can’t be a debate about ending oil subsidies, mind you. Just that the president shouldn’t be able to make such broad knee-jerk unilateral decisions in response to shitposts. Or even non-shitposts.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago

It wouldn't work. They are incapable of that kind of self reflection

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Yep. It'd be a real shame if this asshole "influencer" were thrown in prison.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 56 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There should be criminal charges for this kind of reckless behavior and outright falsehoods. But then who makes the rules right? 🙃

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What he's doing would be considered slander in a developed country.

In the US you almost need to be able to get a written confession from someone spreading slander for it to hold up on court, though.

I do agree that deliberately spreading misinformation that translates to real political or societal consequences should be illegal. Then again, that'd mean all Republicans and establishment Dems would be in jail for life, so such laws won't happen here.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

When I checked earlier, it looked to me like it would be libel because it is a more or less permanent, published piece of media.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I said what I said because our slander and libels laws are a joke now thanks to Trump.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Did he get any money from Russian sources, I wonder?

[–] etherphon@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

These assholes just cannot stop lying about literally everything, why do we tolerate this behavior.

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 16 points 3 days ago

yet another "women are to blame for me never getting a date" loser, punching down in order to feel like a big man

[–] texture@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

this little creep was groomed by his mom into this line of work. hes no idea what hes talking about at any point in any of his stupid and hateful videos. shame on his mother and shame on him.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's always the white guys that look like it would be. The "master" race y'all.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Always makes me think of this...

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

I'm thinking he's a racist as well.

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 5 points 3 days ago

Water is wet.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip -3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Freedom of speech is a bitch.

Edit: I didn't mean it like that, y'all. I meant it at face value. It sucks that this turd gets a free pass to spew crap.

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is an indictment of free speech at least the way the US handles it.

I suspect you come from the right wing perspective, so you're satisfied with bad faith reporting that may be carelessly or even recklessly indifferent to truth or nuance - or even knowingly false - because it serves the purposes of the Republican Party and in particular MAGA/Trump (including distracting from his increasingly obvious pedophile past). However you will not be in support when the next one comes along and leverages the speed of virality against plodding legalistic and good-faith journalistic systems to work against your interests.

In short, you're too shortsighted to see why supporting this is damaging to you as well.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago

No I edited my reply. I'm am absolutely not rightwing, just stupid in communicating my thoughts.

[–] forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yeah, fuck right off with that bullshit. You're rights only extend far enough to not interfere with anybody else's rights. This jackass absolutely deserves to face consequences.