this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2026
58 points (100.0% liked)

politics

27058 readers
3606 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 66 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

This fucking thumb decides to run to the center in a heavily democratic district with his only Democratic bonafide being anti-trump. This isn't laudable at all. It risks losing a potentially progressive seat to a Lincoln project/bulwark conservative "Democrat."

If he wanted to do some actual good, he could primary a MAGAt republican in a safely red district. But no.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There's more money to be made in primarying progressives than in primarying conservatives.

[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

True! If the Democratic party apparatus can't galvanize and find a better candidate, it's just another sign that they're beyond fully cooked.

I wanted something different from "knife fighter" Ken Martin, but either he's getting the cold shoulder from the old guard, or he's pandering to them. Come on Ken, be the Brutus/Longinus to Schumer's (et al.) Caesar.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

The problem is that all the Democratic leadership thinks they're Caesar and they're all terrified of getting shanked if they don't toe the party line.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

his only Democratic bonafide being anti-trump

His wife was legal counsel to Trump during the first term. Absolutely laughable to call him "anti-Trump".

[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They were famously at odds over that ... at least publicly.

It's also essentially the only thing on his platform today that counts as a "Democratic" position

This stooge is intentionally ratcheting the Overton window.

More neocons in the democratic party.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

They were famously at odds over that … at least publicly.

They were the modern James Carville / Mary Matalin power couple, sure. Just entirely encapsulated within the Republican Party. Conway worked closely with Ann Coulter and Matt Drudge, ffs. He was at the forefront of decades of smears and hatchet jobs aimed at public health care, anti-war activism, and civil rights.

More neocons in the democratic party.

They came over like rats fleeing a sinking ship. And then the ship had the audacity not to sink, in large part because they weren't weighing it down.

[–] dugmeup@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

Oh look another grifter DINO

[–] acme401@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

This fucking bozo. He's enabling grifter. I wouldn't fucking trust him for any reason. Fuck that.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Excited to hear the Vote Blue No Matter Who brigades come out in force for this clown.

[–] wavebeam@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Lots of other completely "doesn't happen here" shit has been happening here. so if i were a degenerate gambler, I'd be putting money on Kalshi or whatever that this dude falls out a window in the next 6 months.