this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2026
162 points (99.4% liked)

politics

27645 readers
3772 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  1. Get paid upfront cause Trump famously won't pay for shit.

  2. Reject the US occupation anyway.

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rothe@piefed.social 91 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They would be very foolish to believe Trump would actually pay them that money. A Trump never pays his bills.

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe Trump will go in the same location as Tywin. Even if not, I recommend that be the rumour anyway.

[–] Maultasche@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Wouldn't be the first time the Danish killed a king on the toilet

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago

Are you saying that the Danes have precedence for presidents?

(Or "heads of state", but that sounds as good)

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 62 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

LOL.

Most people will receive at least $100k in health care in their lives.

You'd still be better off as a Dane.

[–] MagicianWithABadPlan@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

American here. I lived in Denmark for a few years and this is 100% correct.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 61 points 3 weeks ago

~5.6 billion USD, to

  • get your free healthcare stripped,
  • get your secularism stripped,
  • get your land polluted,
  • and to get killed by rogue cops.
[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 3 weeks ago

Right... Millions US citizens are starving but he wants to pay foreigners loads of money to join the US. That's going to work out great! The US has a great track record when it comes to natives. They probably all will be deported to an El Salvador prison or put in a bordered off reserve on top of a landfill.

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 34 points 3 weeks ago

Ah yes a financial promise from Donald Trump. Rock solid by all historical accounts.

[–] brunchyvirus@fedia.io 28 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I wonder how many people are still waiting on their million dollars Musk "offered" for votes.

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

He never paid?! 😄

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 25 points 3 weeks ago

That money will never be paid, even if the Greenlanders are suckered into it.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ya know, I bet those residents could start a bidding war if they wanted to. Why take $100k from the US when Canada might give you $150k, or the EU might give you $200k a piece?

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 20 points 3 weeks ago

Unfortunately, you can't have a bidding war when the highest bidder has no intention of paying.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 weeks ago

Is he trying to pay the shareholders of Greenland above market price so they’ll be willing to merge with the US?

What the fuck is this even?

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

$100K? So anywhere from 3 months to 5 years worth of American medical expenses?

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

With insurance too

[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 3 weeks ago

Called it: https://vger.to/discuss.tchncs.de/post/52374672

But wow, just 100k? I had forgotten how cheap Trump is.

I'd love to know the conditions for the payment to happen. Are they going to do what? Force a referendum? They can't. Are they gonna force people to leave after the payment? With that money? Where to?

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

"we can't afford healthcare for all" but can try this stunt

[–] FukOui@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 weeks ago

Feels stupid. Pay with what, printed paper?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Apparently we have bundles of cash to hand over for a vanity "but what about my legacy?" project from Taco, but food stamps for kids in Minnesota?

Fuck that, I guess?

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Do any of their sources explicitly state the payment will be in cash? I bet Trump makes up another shitty crypto token and figures out a way to carve out a fee on each transaction for himself.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Lowballing, just like every damn billionaire grifter.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today -4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You can give $100k to all homeless Americans and they would go homeless again after 5 to 10 years.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"What’s exciting is that the research is clear that these cash transfers are helpful, and the big concerns that they might disincentivize employment or contribute to inflation were not substantiated in our evidence review.”

PN3’s recent evidence review looked extensively at various programs that put money directly in the hands of families, from studies of unconditional cash transfer (UCT) programs in Illinois, Massachusetts and Texas, to existing dividend-based unconditional cash transfers, to child allowance pilot programs throughout the U.S. Two of the largest and most data-rich programs the researchers studied were the Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend and the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians Payments, neither of which was intended to be an anti-poverty program but each of which have measurably reduced poverty among their constituents.

In 2021, in what amounted to the first and so far, only nationwide case study of the impact of cash transfers, the Biden administration temporarily expanded the federal child tax credit (CTC) through the American Rescue Plan Act. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the expansion lifted 2.1 million children out of poverty. For Black and Latino children, official poverty measures shrank more compared to the decline in rates for white children. The temporary cash infusion also had notable benefits on mental health, again with a greater difference observed with Black families. An additional $100 per child per month reduced depression symptoms in all low-income parents, with Black parents seeing nearly twice the reduction in depression and anxiety symptoms as other subgroups.

One study found that the monthly cash difference of $313 per month led to some changes in infant brain activity, with infants whose mothers received $333 monthly showing higher “fast-brain” activity compared to babies of mothers receiving $20 monthly. The brain’s mid- and high-frequency bands are associated with cognitive skills, which indicates that cash transfers may improve development of these skills, though more research is needed to draw a direct link.

According to an analysis at Washington University in St. Louis, child poverty in the U.S. costs up to $1.03 trillion a year in loss of economic productivity, increased health and crime costs, homelessness and maltreatment. Cash transfer policies seem like a bargain in comparison by helping mitigate social challenges and reduce government spending in health and human services.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You misunderstood or misinterpreted my point.

$100k today will not get you in the door of any house. You probably couldn't even buy a burnt down lot in California. But you could pay rent for a while. $100k might get you 5 to 10 years of rent money. You could buy a van and you could make that your home.

$100k is spitting on your face.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

Oh, my bad.