this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
504 points (99.6% liked)

politics

27242 readers
3032 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 97 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

If this administration doesn't succeed in overthrowing democracy, and we ever get legitimate leaders again, I wonder if we could get some kind of official recognition or honor given to the people who have been wounded or killed while standing up for their rights and the rights of everyone in the U.S.?

[–] huppakee@piefed.social 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

My cynical take is in 20 years you'll have a day of remembrance and in 80 years your grandchildren will have official apologies, unless this current administration ends doesn't get thrown out within 5 years - then it will take even longer. My less cynical take is that these people aren't losing their lives or ability to see because they want official recognition or honour, they want freedom because that's the thing really matters. I do agree though, once the freedom (and rule of law) is back, these people definitely deserve some kind of official recognition or honour.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Your cynical take is far more optimistic than mine. I am more of the opinion that these incidents will be treated like the race massacres from post-civil war reconstruction: almost entirely forgotten and barely talked about. Actually, it will be even more forgotten than those. People died in those incidents by the thousands. No one is going to remember a few protests with a handful of injuries.

[–] huppakee@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago

You could definitely be right. I believe current day US behaves a lot like 1938-ish Germany, which makes that my expectation on how we will look back on this time is influenced by how we looked back on ww2 in the first decades after it ended. The current regime could easily take another route than Hitlers Germany did.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I hope so, and I hope these people and families get the reparations they deserve.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Now THAT'S the real pie in the sky idea. I think you could realistically get the government paying $5M to some architectural firm to design le "haunting" brutalist monument which is le "stark reminder" of "dark times" that we will "never let happen again", but zero chance anyone gets reparations unless they pay a lawyer and go to court over it

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

And I hope it all happens. Especially the lawyer part.

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

We couldn't even get a plaque put up commentatoring the police who died on January 6th. Wishful thinking.

I guess I just feel like if you're not at least dreaming about a better future, even if it's a distant one you won't live to experience, you've already surrendered.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 days ago

If things go how they historically have in the US likely not

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 47 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 days ago

Time to start firing back with some more lethal rounds

[–] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago

DEATH TO ICE

[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 27 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

The reality is if you protest armed thugs, you really must wear PE. Protect your eyes, ears, elbows, knees. Ideally gas masks too.

[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago

Wear. Eye. Protection. Ballisitic goggles.

[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Our government seems to have forgotten, them holding people accountable on our behalf is their end of the social contract. Our end of the social contract is to pay taxes, abide by the law, and allow the legal system to resolve our conflicts instead of vigilante justice.

If they won't hold people to account on our behalf, the only patriotic option remaining is to hold them accountable on our own behalf.

[–] Vupware@lemmy.zip 11 points 5 days ago

This nation needs some R&R — Reparations and Repercussions.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

as bad as the blinding sounds, the shrapnel worries me more. i'm familiar with a kickass surgeon in phoenix who might be able to help, but i don't know how to contact the injured.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Thanks. My SIL had an awful carotid injury and the folk at ucsf did amazing things to save her life before a clinic in Phoenix did too. Dad had a great brain surgeon at ucsf too. They may be able to get some of that shrapnel out safely.

[–] KittyCat@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward."

Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn , The Gulag Archipelago 1918–1956

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

While I agree with the spirit, I have to stop you here

But had understood they had nothing left to lose

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-threatens-to-use-insurrection-act-to-put-down-protests-in-minneapolis

You should be asking yourself why does he keep threatening this? Why doesn't he just do it? Why would he need this to escalate? What is he waiting on?

Clearly, he's antagonizing because he wants the U.S. military (and all of its weapons and drones) to carry out what his small illiterate army of Nazis is already doing in American cities. What you have to lose now is that you would be handing him exactly what he wants.

It may be inevitable, but what do you accomplish by making it any easier on him?

Make him keep begging for it. Make him keep showing the whole world what a pathetic greasy little orange shit stain he and his storm troopers are.

Let history remember how pathetic and disgustingly passive aggressive the most "powerful" man in the world and his army really were in their war against America.

[–] KittyCat@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He'll generate what he wants regardless, that's the point. We should be peaceful yes, but we should match any escalation against peaceful protest, because doing otherwise shows there is no consequences for escalation. In other words let them make the first move, but be ready for it.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

but we should match any escalation against peaceful protest

It depends on what you mean by match it. Your goal should be to humiliate them, and make them look like the feeble minded simpletons that they are, not to provide them with a victim narrative.

Friendly reminder, they are trying to get protestors to fire on federal officers by antagonizing protestors with their (probably bullet proof patrol cars), most likely to justify the defense argument currently being used by the officer who murdered Renee good.

These are some pathetic and passive aggressive little bitches on a power trip. It would be easy to make them the victims. Don't do it.

https://sh.itjust.works/post/53375650

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Go to the local construction store and buy safety glasses.

[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Make sure they're ANSI impact rated. Even better, get a full-face shield that attaches to a hard hat so you wear swimming goggles and a respirator underneath to protect against tear gas.

A motocross chest protector will take a lot of the sting away from those rubber bullets. If you're a man, WEAR A CUP. Police aim for the groin when they can see the face is protected.

[–] Saprophyte@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/ice-border-patrol-less-lethal-weapons-protesters/

The article was mistaken, they refer to it as non-lethal rounds. Even DHS itself refers to them as less lethal. There is a difference between less lethal and non-lethal.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

A point without distinction, mate. They fired a weapon at close range at that man. The state knows what potential these weapons have, which is why they use them.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

A point without distinction, mate.

I mean, that really depends on where you are, doesn't it? Some places make distinctions between non-lethal weapons and less-lethal weapons and some don't. Pretty much any weapon can kill if used on someone's head or other vital areas. Projectiles tend to fly faster the closer they are to what shot them.

I see the issue as either one of poor training (not trained to use the weapon) or poor training (trained to use the less-lethal weapon in a lethal manner) and I'm not sure which frightens me more right now. Probably the latter.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 days ago

The entire law enforcement apparatus is well aware of the potential to maim or kill with their less-than lethal weapons. These motherfuckers pull out their pepper ball guns, bean bag guns, and then shoot people at point blank range, in hope of maiming.

Making a distinction between “less-than” and “non” lethal does not matter if the results are the same.

The only good pig is one that is roasting over the fire.

[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If’n we want to get fundamental , we know who shot who & still has 2 eyeballs. Just sayin’. If justice doesn’t serve us, perhaps the people shall determine the verdict for vermin passing as human. If we can doctor up a bill, float it through ice, pretend we gonna be head knockers, but b/c they didn’t really read fine print. Doozy of a munitions bill gets ice as it’s target. It can be done. But I’m leaning towards someone with more money & knowledge telling me it’s a great idea. Then that is the point where I say, great, you pay for it all. Then I end up floating somewhere in NJ. I live in the PNW. Any other ideas people?

[–] Poojabber@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Maybe I just need some more coffee this morning, but right now, Im just wondering what this gibberish word salad is supposed to actually mean....

[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I read an incredibly disturbing article about someone who was anti ice & ended up being offered a job. With ice. https://www.democracynow.org/2026/1/14/laura_jedeed_ice Holy Moly. Anyways. Yes. There is some gibberish mostly. Perhaps if we can read nuance and take that word salad, deconstruct. Then examine what we’re goin for. I’ll have another cup of java w/ya 😉