this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2026
60 points (92.9% liked)

Ask Lemmy

36684 readers
1781 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have finished watching Star Trek Next Generation and Deep Space 9 following a friend's recommendation. I enjoyed both shows and started watching the other one, Star Trek Voyager.

So far, I'm not finding it as enjoyable as the other two. I want to try to see it through the eyes of someone who enjoys the show, maybe it will also help me understand why it feels different somehow.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Apeman42@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Good parts: The Doctor, Seven of Nine, Tom and B'Elana

The bad: Any time the holodeck goes black and white, salamanders, every single thing about the Kazon

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

They never did a mirror universe episode or a section 31 episode, so they have that going for them.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 0 points 10 hours ago

It needed to find itself. The Doctor remains a great character throughout the run. Everyone else does get some moments to shine though.

Some really great episodes but the trash episodes are REALLY bad.

For myself, I just didn't like Voyager's design. I know that might seem petty, but I just thought the ship didn't look right. I've always been a refit Constitution class man.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

It's the most action oriented Star Trek series. Or was when it was newish, anyway. Stuff is always happening, there are very few political episodes that just consist of talking, they do a bunch of fun shit with the holodecks, and it has an exciting premise.

It is my favorite series right behind Lower Decks for these reasons. Deep Space 9 is just beside it and not above or below, because I love it equally for entirely different reasons (it does the drama, politics and even religion stuff so fucking well).

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

voyager also explored unexplored area of the galaxy, the delta quadrant. it makes things more interesting, although some of the races are worth revisting again or established further in canon. delta quadrant races seemed to be more technology advanced than the other 3 quadrants,(mainly because species dont have to follow much rules, plus enemies like the borg. (voth, briori, the "sky people", plus iconian gateway destinations) cant ignore what happened to think tank, or that the vidiians found the cure.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I really wanna know more about the aliens that were spying on Voyager through the EMH after he gave himself dreams, and they were seeing his dreams thinking it was real. Those dudes were interesting as hell and only appear in ONE episode. 😩

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

the hierarchy, they have been a couple episodes, one of thier ships where they were lost in the void, and they advanced spying tech, seem to have some form of cloaking too helping voyager escaping from the void. they seemed to be pretty advanced compared to voyager. they were spying on an enemy vessel listening to thier conversations.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I actually tended to dislike the holodeck episodes, because it always seemed to boil down to some variation of “the holodeck is {malfunction} and the ship will {bad thing} because {technobabble}, unless we go in and manually turn it off. But oh no, {malfunction} means the holodeck controls are disabled and the safeties are turned off!”

I know they were struggling for human plots in the deep of space, and the holodeck was usually their way to have humans surrounded by other humans in places that weren’t distinctly alien. But that meant a lot of the holodeck plots usually needed some sort of broader impetus to get the crew to engage with it. Because the stakes are low if the holodeck is working properly and the safeties are enabled; Whenever things get tense, the crew can just pause the simulation and exit the holodeck. So lots of the holodeck episodes ended up putting a proverbial gun to the crew’s heads with “shit’s broke, and it’ll do bad things to the ship if you just refuse to enter the deck. Now go pretend to be {period character} for the plot!”

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

I meant like Tom's black and white holonovels and the Hirogen WW2 episode. Those are great, even if the former falls under the same "uh oh, the saftey protocols are broken" stuff.

The only other holodeck episode that is super fun is the James Bond one from DS9 where they "win" the "game" by just letting the villain destroy the fantasy world so all the people trapped in the holodeck wouldn't die.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 11 hours ago

i think the HOLO-episodes from voyager were more well done than ds9 ones.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I had loved Voyager for years before I found out that a lot of fans don't like it. I don't care, I still like it a lot. I think Janeway is a terrific captain.

It was Enterprise and Discovery that I thought really, really sucked.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

STD is probably the worst of the nutrek. even enterprise for all its fault, mostly about the xindi arc is better than nutrek, if they just stuck romulan war era, than it wouldve been much better. picard couldve been better as a post-nemesis arc if patrick stewart wasnt so low energy and seem likes he doesnt want to act the scenes, if they stuck with the romulan arcs, or even the borg(2nd season) slightly better, 3rd season was just all over the place.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 18 hours ago

The crack

They are gods at it

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 3 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

The more I've been thinking about this, the more I realize that because Voyager (or most trek of that era) isn't totally serialized, there's no real reason that you HAVE to watch it sequentially for the first time.

As long as you're avoiding spoiler episodes, there's no reason that you can't just watch some random stand-alone episodes, and I'm confident that watching some of those first will make you want to go back and watch the entire thing to see "how they got there."

So with that said, if you want to understand my love for Voyager, these are the top ten episodes I would recommend that are stand-alone and don't contain spoilers and epitomize why I say that Voyager is better than most people give it credit for.

  • Living Witness (S4)
  • Blink of an Eye (S6)
  • One Small Step (S6)
  • Timeless (S5)
  • Scientific Method (S4)
  • The Void (S7)
  • Relativity (S5)
  • Counterpoint (S5)
  • Shattered (S7)
  • Deadlock (S2)

There are others that I would put in there, but those would include character spoilers that I'd want to avoid.

I believe if you watch those standalone stories, you'll get the gist of what people love about Voyager.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 0 points 10 hours ago

distant origin, trek loves dino in space.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Shit does get a little weird after Year of Hell, since they refer to it a lot. But they also refer to it at least once BEFORE that episode because time travel.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 1 points 23 hours ago

True. I avoided any two parter on the list just because two-parters are best when you know the characters a bit more. I tried to limit it to episodes that would be akin to TNG standalone's like Darmok or Schisms; episodes that are good even without knowing the characters.

[–] cymor@midwest.social 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Like the other two, it takes a season or so to find it's footing. I like a female captain, former enemies working together, and ship out of water stories. The redemptive and maturity arc of Paris, and his friendship with Kim. The Doctor and 7 learning what it is to be human. Chakotay's beliefs aren't made fun of, but explored. The hopefulness that even thrown across the galaxy, humans can (most of the time) stay true to their beliefs. That you can overcome your upbringing to become a better person. There's lots to like.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Jane way and Paris boink as animals. And then the tension and awkwardness afterwards when they are humans again. I found that delightfully hilarious.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It was still a lot better than whatever else was on TV at 8 PM in 1997. That's pretty much where I'm at with it.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I can't speak for everyone of course, but as someone who genuinely was not fond of DS9 (not because of writing quality or anything like that, it was great for what it was in that regard.)

After DS9, Voyager had the audacity to try to be FUN again. It offered a really good mix of some serious episodes with some downright goofy episodes. For every "Year of Hell" or "Equinox", you would get an episode where they were attacked by giant viruses, or a good old fashioned holodeck program goes haywire episode.

It wasn't afraid to dive into Shlock after DS9 tried to be sooooo fucking serious.

To me, that was a breath of fresh air.

Also:

  1. Janeway is easily the best captain overall. She doesn't give "Picard Speeches" like Stewart of course, but in every other aspect, her leadership is amazing throughout that series.

  2. Voyager 2 parters were usually epic. This of course comes from the fact that the CGI had come a long way from the TNG days, but with the exception of Best of Both Worlds, I'd put Year of Hell, Equinox and Scorpion ALL better than any other two parter from any other series.

If your comparison is to DS9 and you want "super serious" than yeah...of course Voyager isn't going to be for you. But if you want something that isn't afraid to be a little silly sometimes, Voyager is hella-fun.

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The worst thing about Voyager going forward is it's never going to get the kind of remaster TOS/TNG/DS9 got.

It was filmed in the transitional period between film and digital and all the effects weren't done on film like those series. The masters were done digitally, at broadcast quality.

From interviews/behind the scenes stuff someone would basically have to redo all the editing and effects work from scratch if they got their hands on the raw film. Honestly wouldn't be surprised if someone is crazy enough to do that. But that's a ton of work with basically no financial incentive.

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 hours ago

I’m sure I’ll be downvoted but good use case for new AI editing tools that are coming out.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

picard was too moral compared to sikso and janeway, she was willing to violate more rules because they are so far from home.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

See, that's what I love about Picard. He's a man who deeply believes in the value of morality and the difficulty of maintaining it and effective leadership. It shines through to every aspect of who he is. We see a man who was once a rambunctious youth, once was an overly ambitious officer, and now is tempered and weathered by mistakes and failures and knows that starfleet succeeds or fails on the behaviors of people like him. I find him incredibly relatable and eminently admirable in this struggle.

I haven't gotten to ds9 or voyager yet, but this thread is making me glad I'm going to tos after I finish tng. It will serve as a palate cleanser

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

If you like that about Picard, you’ll probably hate Kirk. Kirk frequently wipes his ass with the Prime Directive. His relationship with Spock frequently boils down to some variation of the following:

Kirk: “I’m gonna break the rules cuz it makes my job easier.”
Spock: “No, please do not. That is against the rules.”
Kirk: Does it anyways.

I will say that the Kirk/Picard contrast is largely due to who they are paired with on the bridge. As individual characters, Kirk is a giant nerd while Picard is basically Indiana Jones. But their first mates make them seem like the complete opposites…

Kirk is a giant nerd. But he’s paired with the even-tempered and by-the-book Spock, and frequently goes on away missions… So Kirk seems super wild and impulsive in comparison, because Spock is constantly nagging him about the rules. Picard is a dude who goes hiking through alien jungles for fun. But he’s paired with the handsome and impulsive Riker, who tends to go on away missions in Picard’s stead… So Picard looks super calm in comparison. But if you put the two captains together without their first mates, Picard would 100% be the wild one. The only real outlier is that Kirk can’t seem to keep it in his pants, (often during his away missions), while Picard tends to be picky about who he beds.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Oh absolutely, and I'm going into it knowing I'm about to see the opposite of Picard, that's why I see it as a palate cleanser lol. My expectation for Kirk is what if the Riker we see in season 1 was a captain, but less of a feminist. Like, I'm expecting him to be feminist by 60s standards, but Riker is over here being feminist by 90s standards. And that's ok, I love Riker as a character as well.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 45 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The concept of a lone ship without Federation support stuck far away from home is compelling. Throughout the series, they go through some shit.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The cast. That’s what I love about the show. The writing can be uneven and often downright contradictory (they ignore the whole “we have limited photon torpedoes” thing from the pilot pretty much immediately and have fun counting the number of shuttle craft they wind up destroying over the course of the series). But the cast is great, especially after a season or so when everyone has figured out their characters a bit.

[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can totally forgive the photon torpedoes and shuttlecraft counts because I don't see Voyager as being a strictly serial show. It kinda straddles the line between episodic and serial without being fully either - and on that basis I'll allow it some degree of 'reset' between episodes.

Where Voyager certainly is serial are the show's characters, and their change and growth as the seasons progress. That's the real story in Voyager, versus whatever problem-of-the-week the ship finds itself in.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 0 points 10 hours ago

for me they have to capability to manufacter more photon torpedoes, and shuttle construction it seems

[–] _NetNomad@fedia.io 16 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Part of it is that Voyager has the unenviable role of being one of TNG's two successor shows. The other was DS9, and everything looks bad sitting next to DS9. Part of why DS9 was able to do the wild things that it did was because the writing team had minimal supervision and were allowed to go buckwild- paramount were keeping a closer eye on first TNG, and then Voyager. Because of that, Voyager plays it safe and worships the status quo even when the fiction is begging to go in another direction, and the whole series has this feeling of having been written by committee. This even frustrated the writers, one of whom left the show out of frustration to go write the Battlestar Galactica reboot, which is essentially gritty, serialized Voyager

that said, I watched the whole thing and largely enjoyed it. you kind of have to meet it where it is, and accept that major plot details get glossed over and everyone takes turns holding the idiot ball. for me, the characters are what salvages the underwhelming plot. being a smaller ship, younger characters like Kim and Paris are able to be movers and shakers, giving the show a coming-of-age quality not found again until LDS and Progidy. Janeway is great when she's not holding the idiot ball, it was really awesome seeing a captain who came up through science instead of command. When the blue or gold shirts give most captains a solution to a problem, they're glad the problem it solved, but Janeway would get excited about the solution itself, sometimes even finishing Belana's sentences.

Neelix had never so much as heard of starfleet, and had none of the training or skills even a crewman would need, but his good nature and see-a-need, fill-a-need ethos arguably makes him the most starfleet person on the boat. Kes is similar, with the added twist of dedicating herself to a voyage she won't live to see the end of.

VOY spoilersPeople say it was good that she left because there wasn't much to do with her character, but to me that's nonsense. Not being able to see her come to terms with her mortality and how that intersects with her psychic powers was easily the show's biggest missed opportunity.

the doctor is an interesting inversion of the good idea/meh execution pattern because his concept is unremarkable- essentially a rehash of Data learning to be human, just accidentally and with sarcasm- but the execution was incredible. later on when 7of9 joins the cast, she displaces him as The Data but he remains a main character and takes on a mentorship role which allows him to develop even further

all in all, it's a show full of then-new and brilliant ideas that regularly fumbles the execution. and that isn't for everyone, especially with the plethora of other great trek out there. but if you watch it and are able to forgive the not great scenario writing you might enjoy it nonetheless

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

interesting that voy had so much meddling from the executives, Nutrek has probably even more plus kurtzman agenda, thats why the new shows are sucky. i always htough BSG was too similar to voyager.

and SGU eventually took from both series.

[–] kfoo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I think Voyager had the meddling/executive oversight it did because it was used as a carrier to literally (not figuratively) launch a new television network. Voyager premiered as the first show on the brand new “UPN” tv network, a network which would later become today’s “The CW”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UPN

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 day ago

Voyager has more and good horror episodes, so if you like those you'll like VOY. It's best enjoyed an episode a day rather than binged. Put one on after work l, that's how I watched it

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I think DS9 was pretty developed already by the end of TNG, so once it started there wasn't that much left to figure out. This can be seen by the TNG crew visiting DS9 towards the end. TNG, however, felt a little more uncertain in the first season in that the actors didn't have their characters nailed down yet, and it shows.

I suspect that Voyager might be a bit more like TNG in this regard - the concept was a bit more uncertain when they started. However, it does improve massively as it moves on.

I for one really like the temporal war storyline. And 7of9 is a great addition even if the writers' intent was mainly that of providing boobage.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 25 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Once you get past the Kazon it gets more varied. The Kazon are just terrible and they drag the show down with them.

That being said, some of my personal favorite VOY episodes are in the first few seasons, they just don't involve the Kazon.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lunchbox2287@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The first season or two are rough. The Kazon stuff is just... Blah, imo. After that it picks up. The character development, I think, is the best part. Mostly the Doctor, if I'm being honest. Later when Seven joins, her character arc is great, too, and while she was definitely supposed to be sex appeal, her actress, Jeri Ryan, crushes it as a character and not just a sex symbol.

I'm guessing the whole Neelix thing is throwing you? He's definitely incredibly grating, but he'll weirdly grow on you as the show progresses.

In my opinion, it's definitely the weakest of the three you mention, but it still has its merits. Even after we leave the Kazon stuff behind, you'll get a one off episode here or there that just falls flat.

I'd suggest trying to power through a bit longer to see if you can pick up anything you start enjoying. And if not, there's no shame in not finishing. Not every series hits for everyone and that's okay.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It depends on how far you've gone. Most Star Trek shows of the era took a while to get up to speed.

Voyager has a cadence similar to TNG except that the various species that Voyager interacts with changes over time. After the Kazon, the new species are better designed and fleshed out.

Seven of Nine is a far better designed character than Kes and the writing for her was so much better. It also seems like the show was able to identify the characters that could carry an episode.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

she was originally brought on as eye candy to boost ratings, she was definitely surpassed that though. kes was a little wierd, probably has to do with the actor, but kes is becoming to OP for the series

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 3 hours ago

The producers knew they were going to fire someone. At point, it was Garrett Wang (Ensign Kim), but he ended up on a TV Guide top 100 hottest people on TV list.

My guess is that the producers picked Jennifer Lien (Kes) because they were already getting better eye candy already, the writers seemed to be having problems writing for Kes, and it was kind of awkward to have Starfleet officers hitting on a nine year old.

load more comments
view more: next ›