this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2026
815 points (99.3% liked)

Programmer Humor

28488 readers
1576 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Congratulations! You've won an iPhone! Click our secure link to claim your prize! We promise this is not a Rip Off!

https://secure.ic6do.com/tRn4TI_ip_grab

EDIT: Please do click the link so my joke can land

EDIT 2: Sorry I'm too much of a wimp to even happy-prank people

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 hour ago (2 children)
[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 1 points 36 minutes ago

I guess there's a pretty short lifespan on these links haha

Well, here it is https://youtu.be/Gu_hxO9iDi8

[–] Grainne@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 hour ago

Lemmy hug of death

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 17 points 11 hours ago
[–] drkt_@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

What even is the point of URL shorteners? I always understood it as a Twitter thing, but I see them more outside of Twitter.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 hour ago

Easier to type when used on posters and other media where you can't simply copypaste

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 13 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I think sometimes it gives people analytics on how many people click the link when the link is to something they themselves don't control. But I'm not entirely sure if that's a common service shorteners offer.

[–] conorab@lemmy.conorab.com 6 points 8 hours ago

They also sometimes give you the ability to change what the link points to which is great if you send out a link only to realise it went to the wrong place after the fact.

[–] 2910000@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I find it handy for writing down a URL on paper

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] 2910000@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

Paper may be old-fashioned but I need something light for the carrier pigeon

[–] eru@mouse.chitanda.moe 5 points 9 hours ago
[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 22 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

When sharing links with people in places where there’s a character limit or to avoid polluting visuals.

Also, when sharing like orally or showing it to someone else when you have no other way to communicate it: ex, the link of a shared cloud file

[–] _g_be@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Infuriatingly, URL shortners are often used in QR codes because they have a character limit-ish (longer strings make for more detailed QR codes, which are harder to scan from further away so it's a trade-off). but if the QR points to a shortened link then it's more difficult to assess where a QR code is pointing without blindly following the link.

[–] 2910000@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

My biggest bugbear relating to this is the lack of a short text alternative for QR codes, especially with long URLs.
If the URL is too long to fit into a QR code, then it's also too long for me to type in manually!

[–] _g_be@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I think I like an alternative that uses full words instead of a string of no sense symbols and mixed case letters.

Something like what What 3 Words does but for short URLs. That would be easy to convey and type

[–] 2910000@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

That's a very good idea.
Beside the number of permutations it gives, another benefit of using three words is they could form the border of the QR code, with the fourth side being the domain name

[–] _g_be@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago
[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 53 points 1 day ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)
[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 15 points 1 day ago

A very good service by DIE PARTEI

Of course it would be them. Love it. Thanks for the link!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I totally believe this works, but there's no way I'm clicking on any of those links

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

I expect most of them are Rickrolls.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 10 points 23 hours ago
[–] Illogicalbit@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 46 minutes ago

This is just straight-up a better version of what OP linked

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 43 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] Chaser@lemmy.zip 20 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Absolutely scary 😬 But link "shortener" may be the wrong name in this case

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 18 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I don't think it purports to be a shortener, just a susener

[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 136 points 1 day ago (9 children)
[–] mogranja@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 12 hours ago

Exactly what I expected. Thanks for not letting me down.

[–] cm0002@infosec.pub 96 points 1 day ago (3 children)

listen here, you little shit

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 95 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Looks like it got too creepy for its own good.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Link shorteners and redirectors, especially new and lesser-known ones tend to get caught in the fray with things like Google Safe Browsing (which FF uses as well) and Smart Screen.

It's because the original/shortened link gets reported and not the real/destination site. Then the domain (of the shortener/redirector) gets flagged, instead of the real site.

This happened to me at work this very week, with a redirector service that's a part of our email security stack. FF and Chrome were both blocking links that were safe, because the redirector service itself was classified as sus.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago
[–] sik0fewl@piefed.ca 73 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Based on these ads, I do not trust the site anyway.

Sketchy dark pattern ads

Love the concept, though.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 45 minutes ago

This is just a straight-up better version of what OP linked: https://phishyurl.com/

[–] wischi@programming.dev 81 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Ad for an ad-blocker. Genius 🀣

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί