this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2026
239 points (99.6% liked)

politics

27211 readers
2328 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Kristi Noem, the homeland security secretary, said officers had not used pepper spray and similar measures limited by a judge’s order, then was confronted with a video that showed chemical agents deployed.

I'm of hearing multiple examples of legal observers being sprayed, as well as being shown their home address and threatened with arrest for merely bearing witness.

The number of House Democrats signed up to impeach her was 97 as of Friday evening

all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 82 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Where are the local police?

Where are the state police?

Maybe I'm naive, but surely if someone violates a judges order that places them in contempt and subject to arrest?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 51 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)
[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

So they're cowards. If they can't fulfill their duty, they should step the fuck down. Just because there are more ICE agents doesn't mean anything. If someone obstructs, arrest them too. It's very simple and ACAB and this is further evidence to support that.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 18 points 10 hours ago

Yes, most cops are cowards. They're very uninterested in taking risks for the community, and would rather posture instead.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 12 points 10 hours ago

It feels a little weird to OSINT my own country's civil war

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 17 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

So your first argument is that police can only enforce laws if they have more force, not because the state/government delegated them to do it? Surreal

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 32 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

It's not "if they have more force" but in a practical sense, its actually risky, and cops are incredibly wimpy

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 3 points 7 hours ago

First cops can't enforce the symbolic order because they don't have overwhelming power. Then the judges are afraid to make a resolution that no one would enforce either way.

[–] zerodown@lemmy.world 16 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

BIL is a deputy and refuses to work on patrol, only works the courts because the streets are too scary… asked him if maybe he should pick a different job if he’s that afraid. “The pension and benefits are too good”

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Tbh, I’d prefer a panicky cop work a court room than be a beat cop

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Yup, that's how you get cops who can't even fathom what "de-escalation" means

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 1 points 7 hours ago

You’re right, but I feel like we should have a better standard for who’s allowed to be a cop in general for a lot of reasons.

Court room cop seems like a gravy ass fucking job though.

[–] Rhoeri@piefed.world 12 points 11 hours ago

Most of them converted to ICE.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 29 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Should be every single one of the 212 House Democrats signed into this, what in the actual fuck.

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Pretty sure they didn’t, but happy to entertain your theory.

And before I get downvoted to hell, I’m legitimately wanting to see the evidence because I’m really pushing my Dem candidates to show me they have plans and AREN’T going to be the get along gang next term.

[–] RampageDon@lemmy.ca 16 points 10 hours ago

I think that's their point. They are saying every house Democrat should have signed it and it's crazy they haven't

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 11 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Can't be a war crime if you do it to your own citizens. That's what their tax dollars are for.

[–] Rhoeri@piefed.world 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I propose that we all stop paying taxes until these inept and treasonous pieces of shit are no longer in our government.

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

How does it go again?

No taxation without representation!

[–] Rhoeri@piefed.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Something like that, yeah.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 9 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

Happy to see my Rep at least signed onto the bill.

EDIT: And you a word in the description

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Make sure you tell them. Positive reinforcement helps

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago

Indeed. I did before I wrote my comment.

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Mine hasn't. Bleh