this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2026
385 points (99.5% liked)

News

34308 readers
3710 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Six years after the US justice department launched an immediate criminal investigation of the video-recorded killing of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer, deputy attorney general Todd Blanche confirmed on Sunday that the department is “not investigating” the fatal 7 January shooting of Renee Good by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent in the same city.

The killing of Good, less than a mile from where Floyd was murdered in May 2020, was recorded on at least five phones, including one held by the ICE agent who shot her, Jonathan Ross.

Blanche, a former personal lawyer for Donald Trump before he won his second presidency, dismissed the need for any criminal investigation of Ross during an interview with Fox News. He suggested that the officer was cleared by the publicly available video evidence.

“Is the FBI conducting an investigation into that agent, into the shooting?” Blanche was asked, in response to criticism from Minnesota’s governor, Tim Walz.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Omg wut 😱 "We looked into it and it turns out that there are no crimes except the ones being perpetrated by the president's enemies. It turns out he and his wealthy friends aren't pedophiles, and shooting a woman in cold blood in front of the entire world is always self defense as long as you support and defend the president who totally isn't a baby killing pedophile."

Vermeule states that law in this sense is "not tethered to particular written instruments of civil law or the will of the legislators who created them"[1] but instead embody rational determinations of the common good, and it is those determinations, as well as the natural law background against which they are made, which constitute the law. Vermeule says that these principles include "a candid willingness to "legislate morality."

A law is simply the embodiment of a leader's moral reasoning, and there's no room for moral relativity when it comes to what the leader decides is either right or wrong (because he gets to decide). A just law means no law at all for Nazis and pedophiles and the people that protect and enable them. So say king pedophile, and the anti-elitist conservatives with degrees from Harvard and Yale.

Also they are just ripping off the philosophy of literal Nazis, but don't call them Nazis bc that might be a felony. 🤫

The ultranationalist "Leader Principle" vested "complete and all-embracing" authority in the "myth person"[6] of Hitler who, as Rudolf Hess declared in 1934, "was always right and will always be right."

Vermeule has always been a fan girl when it comes to how can we apply Nazi law to the justice system in America. But again, pointing out reality is highly offensive to delicate Nazi snowflakes, so if you see this link to his work on the Harvard law review page, I guess no you don't 🤷‍♀️

https://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/vo122_vermeule.pdf

Or if you prefer a more casual Donotsaynazi experience, you can read his substack (for real) https://thenewdigest.substack.com/p/chevron-by-any-other-name

This excerpt from last year tells all the woke worry warts they should stop making such a big deal about the SCOTUS decision to overturn the Chevron deference. A sentiment that Trump's current CIA director has also shared for at least 8 years, long before the SCOTUS decision to overturn it in 2024 and long before the CIA was leading the recent invasion of Venezuela in 2025.

So relax, there's no Nazis, there's no unjust oil (and mineral) war. Just America being great and a lot of paranoid Pennys making a big kerflufel over the shadow under the bed, which the justice department has looked into, and assures you there's nothing to be worried about..

Then they called you a fucking rube under their breath, but you didn't hear it. Just like we all didn't hear Jonathan Ross call that lady a fucking bitch after he ~~murdered~~ neutralized her in "self defense."

[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

You vote fo it!

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I keep saying this... All of us who said trump was an absolute shit show of a human and unfit for office, were absolutely far more correct than we even knew. No matter how bad you think he is, he's worse.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago

'Ya but harris had a funny laugh, apparently.'

'i had to protest the party somehow.'

'They were backed by the same warmongers'

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 0 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I remember when Kamala Harris and Hillary Clinton ran presidential campaigns utilizing that same mentality.

As it turns out, it was a losing strategy.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 0 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I remember when third party / non-voter people perpetually insisted since before I was born that any election now we'll "teach dems a lesson".

As it turns out, it was a losing strategy and it aided fascism, precisely as every thinking person knew would happen.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml -2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

contrary to popular belief the numbers don't support you argument. Would-be Dem supporters went to Trump. Third-party voters OTOH owe you nothing. They aren't in your party, and I'd rather vote for who I want, and lose instead of voting for who I adamantly don't want and win. Since winning isn't my immediate end-goal, however, I'm highly unlikely to vote for a right-wing party candidate regardless.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Go ahead and keep going on "logic" and ignore easily predictable outcomes. That way, you can feel SO smug all the time. A moral perfect little angel, so much better than everyone else and DEFINITELY blameless.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml -1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

lol. thank you. I will. Maybe it will encourage you guys to come up with more of a winning strategy since you seem so disappointed about your candidates lack of support.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, I will get with my friends at the DNC and change everything, post-haste! Despite barely even supporting any democrats at all, I definitely support literally all of them, ESPECIALLY the DNC.

And you can keep on handing your vote to conservatives while pretending a russian asset would be a good candidate in any context.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml -1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

ooh, accusing me of being a "russian asset." that's original, now that you know I don't see things your way. Let me make it simple. Your vote is the main declaration of your support. So, yes if you voted Democrat then you don't just "barely support" a candidate but instead you Acutely "support" them. The only way to be more supportive is to make large monetary donations

-Also by your logic my vote went to Republicans. By that same logic Do you think the Liberterian voters also support Trump or do you think the anti-government gun-nuts also owe the Democrats their support? Wait I know, by voting third party in 2020 I helped save democracy for Biden and the Democrats since they won. Good thing they solved all, er some, well none of the problems that led to trump getting into office.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

...Did you just admit to being Jill Stein? Or are you saying you wrote in your own name?

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

you never answered my questions. I asked you first.

secondly, I voted for Claudia De La Cruz and prior to that I voted for Howie Hawkins

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No, I fully expected all of this. That's why I held my nose and voted for Harris. Not one single thing he's done is surprising.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Same. He has a history going back decades even before he ran for office and before he was given that stupid game show that gave a lot of halfwits the idea he was Good At Bidness (and Being Good At Bidness == Good At Presidency, naturally).

He's always been a vainglorious evil piece of shit failson and evidence for him being quite racist goes back to the 70s.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 12 hours ago

I wish someone had given him a late night talk show instead of the presidency.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I expected a lot of this and worse. 3 more years of awful decisions remain though. That's why I say it's always worse than you think. Because it will always get worse, as long as he draws breath.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago

Getting away with murder AND being paid for it.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Well, isn't Pam Blondie's DOJ "investigating" the wife of the victim?

[–] ignirtoq@feddit.online 72 points 1 day ago

Oh good, then the federal government can turn over any evidence the Minnesota state investigators ask for since they don't need it, right? Right?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I thought all lives mattered...

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

There is a bit of small print when it comes to worthy victims vs. unworthy victims.