this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2026
243 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

79064 readers
3705 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 69 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Isn’t all of Dropout.tv hosted on Vimeo?

Edit: yes it is

“Do not build your own app. Vimeo's right here. I don’t have to worry about customer service. I don't have to worry about legal compliance... Our budget can go to what actually matters to us and what we’re actually good at, which is content."

Andrew Bridgman, Chief Digital Officer at Dropout

that might age poorly

[–] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Other video hosting providers are available if it ever becomes a problem. I don't think they will loose much sleep over this.

[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

True, it doesn’t seem like something that would kill the business. But still, I would think the prospect of migrating an entire streaming service to a completely different platform might warrant losing at least a little sleep.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What you lose is audience. People often aren't willing to replatform for a single creator.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Vimeo is the backend, not the platform.

[–] CXORA@aussie.zone 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

But they won't be asked to replatform. Dropout have their own website. Them changing service provider should be mostly invisible to consumers.

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I'm sure it'll be noticeable, but Dropout could market it as a fancy new update/UI. Users definitely aren't going to have to migrate anywhere.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Fuck. Vimeo is used by many filmmakers and streaming services, moving all of that content elsewhere will be downright impossible to carry out completely. A lot of content will be irrecoverably lost once the company is really killed off.

Last year or so they disabled viewing other people's profiles or even searching the website for users in the EU. I have to admit I haven't seen any service being so actively destroyed by its owners.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

by its owners

They have new owners, apparently.

Seems to be a typical buyout into milking and eroding cycle.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 94 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Whelp, hopefully federated video sharing gets the momentum it needs to compete with YT. Seems like it's the only alternative that'll be left.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago

Video sharing is not a technically difficult problem in 2026. It really is just about making the money work.

[–] felixwhynot@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I have seen a few smaller ones pop up too (admittedly not open source) like Nebula. I could see the appeal of a professional hosting service for creators

[–] greybeard@feddit.online 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't know about Floatplane or Nebula, but Dropout uses Vimeo as their back end. So this could impact some of the independent guys.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Ah shit, I hadn't thought of that. Hopefully this gives them a kick to upgrade their system or get something of their own.

[–] Dindonmasker@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago

Floatplane too i guess.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Patreon seems like the most likely competitor. I think some content is now hosted directly there.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That will simply never happen, YouTube I think is a two digit percentage of global Internet traffic.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

I doubt Vimeo was putting up numbers that actually competed, either, but it was there as an alternative.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Need to solve the discover-ability of it though. Peertube is only useful if you know what you're going there for.

[–] Trilogy3452@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

We need a Peektube to accompany it

[–] Alb@sh.itjust.works 54 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not a good news both for users and creators.

Price hikes coming... As usual with this company.

[–] l3ored@piefed.social 6 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago

Companies that want control over their videos. I.e. not to have ads play, not to have their videos followed by suggested content that sends viewers to competitors, nor have that alternate content show when the UI is paused or interacted with. It also allows updating of videos (whereas YouTube makes you upload a new video and you loose all links or view stats/momentum from the switch)

[–] PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Pretty popular among film students and indie filmmakers

[–] Alb@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago

Mainly creators of visual content from all backgrounds

[–] ideonek@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago

"Vimeo. AI-powerd video platform".

[–] PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social 34 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That's wild, because I recall seeing job postings for Vimeo as recently as 2 months ago.

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 66 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Job postings don't necessarily mean that they're actually hiring. Sometimes job postings are used to appear healthy in public.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 9 points 2 days ago

That or they post them so they can say they did before promoting within, hiring based on nepotism, or to be able to do a H1B hire.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

More often than you think. I‘ve seen some shocking claims about ghost job listings on LinkedIn. It’s estimated almost one out of four listings are made without the intend to hire someone.

Of course you can be skeptical about these numbers so feel free to look up the term „ghost job listings“.

However it does echo what many applicants have been complaining about for years. They apply and get turned down immediately with company claiming they already filled the position or that applicants didn‘t meet some absolutely ridiculous criteria. Meanwhile the job listing stays up for months or even years. Doesn‘t take a genius to realize that listing was never serious and they only did it for research.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 days ago

Companies don't stop hiring, at least in tech. They can force out more expensive talent and hire in cheaper areas or get more junior talent. You could very well interview your potential replacement.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

Hyaenas doing hyaena things.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Looks like they’ve been leaning hard into AI. Ugh.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What makes you say that? The Business Insider source from the comments on the linked page doesn't talk about AI at all. But describes how they were bought, by a firm that does this cycle of buy and layoff.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Because they’ve titled their home page as such. Here’s what I see when I search.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 days ago
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Does Vimeo own their own their own infrastructure, or just lease streaming storage from AWS/Google/Whomever?

If the former, it could be a good takeover target.

[–] _edge@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 2 days ago

Your logic is sound, but Bending Spoon is not know to care about value. If Vimeo owns any infrastructure, they'll sell at it at ebay.