Oh NOW it's a conversation they're willing to have. Not after 20 years of school shootings.
Fucking hypocrite cunts.
this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
569 points (99.1% liked)
politics
27707 readers
2690 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The NRA and gun rights groups have condemned Trump's rhetoric.
Seems like it's just the UltraMAGA typical bootlickers that are rolling over for Trump.
Anything that fractures the republican base is a plus
load more comments
(2 replies)
Remember when he told people to get over it the day after a school shooting?
But protestors getting murdered I by his this is when he calls for removing guns... From the protestors.
It's nuts right? If they ban guns from protestors, what reason will they have to shoot them? What deadly weapon will they say...
Oh right, cars.
Hahaha children are shot in the face. Who cares. A white man packing a concealed weapon is murdered by ICE. Oh noes we must have gun control!
Get the fuck out of here.
Edit: I'm laughing incredulously because the situation is so fucked.
And that white man didnt even USE his gun. So fucking funny.
It's about the feeling of safety. I mean could you imagine how terrifying it must feel just walking around a school, dragging a kicking and screaming 10 year old out and think to yourself... what if one of these kids has a gun and starts shooting! We all see it on the news every day... but it's so much easier to watch when it's just little kids trying to get about their day getting shot. It hits so much harder when it's 30 year old trained gunmen that might have to face being in the line of fire.
Or walking down the street just minding your business spraying pepper spray in peoples faces, and think to yourself, what if someone in this crowd has a gun. I'm only wearing 3 layers of body armor, and I've only got 15 friends around also armed with large assault rifles, gas masks, and tear gas to protect myself, maybe one person in this crowd, might have a weapon somewhere, and might even think about using it.
Or imagine the fear they feel every time they burst down someones door, with only 10 other soldiers, and a mere inches of riot shield in front of them to protect them from these people that have a small chance of owning a firearm somewhere in the house, these brave souls need protection!
I can't imagine what it's like to live in that kind of fear.
I think Uvalde answered that for us.
This isnt new from him. He said take the guns back in like 2018 "Take the guns first, go through due process second"
https://www.c-span.org/clip/white-house-event/user-clip-donald-trump-take-the-guns-first-go-through-due-process-second/4717030
2A still voted for him tho shrugs Something something libs take our guns.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I think this is more intended to remove the citizen population's ability to retaliate against a tyrannical government. You know the thing the second amendment was intended for, according to some folks.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(14 replies)
This is definitely a feeler. As soon as the blowback hits he’ll change topic and prevent like he never said it. Of course MAGA will forget it too
Weirdly, I don't think it's just a feeler. I think this is something Trump actually believes. I mean, the man is in New York billionaire, he's not from American gun culture. Pretty frequently when there's a shooting or gun-related tragedy he talks about taking guns away from people.
You're right that TACO is probably going to TACO and not do anything about it.
On the other hand, this administration has been very clear that First Amendment rights don't apply to their political enemies, and there's no reason they'd feel differently about the Second.
I can easily see gun rights going the way of small government ideology in general - a useful tool when liberals were in power, but counterproductive now that conservatives are running things. There's no right to bear arms against a conservative government, only against a liberal one.
What he told people to get over a school shooting. How is that talking about removing guns.
At this point it is just to aggravate the left side and direct attention away from the main issue, which is ICE murdering people. MAGA at this point only cares that they remain in power and they dismantle the liberal state. Everything else is chatter.
load more comments
(3 replies)
California's strict gun control started with Reagan because he wanted to disarm the Black Panthers. Republicans are pro 2A, as long as it is reserved for white conservative/fascist people.
EDIT: Governor Reagan. So, before he became president, but 100 fold once he got shot.
First he switched the right to pro-tariffs..
Then he switched the right to not-anti-pedophile...
Now switching it to pro-gun-control
Look, can he just hurry the fuck up and get MAGA to support socialism already? I don't feel like waiting this long
I want to agree, but knowing Trump it would be a national flavor of socialism :/
load more comments
(1 replies)
So let's see, no Epstein Files, America First is out the window, prices keep rising, and now we're going to restrict the 2nd Amendment.
What exactly is MAGA in for now? The voracious Corruption? The virtuosic incompetence? The Pedophilia? Death Squads spontaneously forming firing squads and executing American citizens in the streets?
Does this look like the kind of freedom you were voting for?
They are clearly trying to ensure that they will never be subject to a legitimate election again. Minnesota is a test for how many constitutional amendments they can break. Presidential term limits are absolutely the target. When the oligarchs no longer need their cult they will repeal the entire Constitution. Welcome to the New Confederacy.
Trump is nearing his life's term limit. A 3rd term from him personally is not particularly concerning. That's still a red line in the sand that we should never allow anyone to cross but I'll be surprised if he makes it through his current term in good enough condition to even pretend to be in charge.
Trump is just a symptom. The christofascists in his ear are the sickness. Trump is there just to bulldoze through the Constitution and establish a one party system.
load more comments
(4 replies)
Who needs term limits when the term just doesn't end
load more comments
(3 replies)
Settle down people. This isn't what you think it is.
They're using this as an explanation of why Pretti was executed.
They're not suggesting that MAGA dickheads cant carry guns.
While irreconcilable to any thinking person. These two statements can happily co-exist in the minds of idiots.
This whole thing is "rules for thee but not for me".
I'll never forget the surprised Pikachu faces on all of those armed MAGA chuds on January 6th when one of them actually got shot.
They’re using this as an explanation of why Pretti was executed.
Yeah, and they're saying they should be restricted, moreso than they are. That's not the traditional conservative position.
They're not suggesting liberals can't carry guns either. They're saying neither should carry a gun to a protest.
It's a bizarre position.
Will Trump be the one who solves the gun problem in the US?
Nope, because it will be, "Gun for me, not for thee."
Just like when gun control was brought to California when the Black Panthers open carried.
load more comments
(2 replies)
He doesn't know what he is talking about most of the time and this time he didn't realize the camera's were on, or his honest feelings came out.
New yorkers have always known trump is a POS and will change his opinion to whatever gets him money and power. We all know he used to be a democrat, but changed to republican because the democrats hated him and knew he is a POS.
LMAOOOO!!!!!
"PLEASE TREAD ON ME"
This will most probably will be 'limited' gun control. Limited as in 'everyone left oft the GOP is a domestic terrorist'.
load more comments
(1 replies)
He just wants ICE, Fascists, 2A-toters and white rednecks to be armed.
He doesn't want blacks, LGBTQ and enemies of the government to be armed.
load more comments
(2 replies)
We do need gun control. For ICE. Those criminals should not be armed.
load more comments
(1 replies)
hes getting spooked out....
Republicans with the mask off
Oh now the ‘tHeY gUn GiT yEr GuNz’ asshat cares about gun control? How long till political affiliation counts as reason to revoke gun permits?
load more comments
(7 replies)
From the guy that defended Rittenhouse’s gun as a tool of “self defense.”
"Don't Tread On Me" bros warming up, stretching, hydrating, preparing to stoop the lowest they have ever stooped to lick Trump's boots as he ramps up his attacks on the Second Amendment
Best part of this article.
Hey guys, I think I heard dingo here say he wants the Epstein files released in full. Let's do him that favor. Long overdo.
Whaaaaaaaat! The guy who said "Take the guns first, go through due process second" is suggesting they take your guns? Its almost like he says what he is going to do before he does it, Im sure absolutely no one saw this coming.
view more: next ›