Nah, it’s not intelligent.
Everything we have today wouldn’t be considered AI in science fiction.
this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
394 points (99.2% liked)
Showerthoughts
40887 readers
1657 users here now
A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.
Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:
- Both “200” and “160” are 2 minutes in microwave math
- When you’re a kid, you don’t realize you’re also watching your mom and dad grow up.
- More dreams have been destroyed by alarm clocks than anything else
Rules
- All posts must be showerthoughts
- The entire showerthought must be in the title
- No politics
- If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
- A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
- Posts must be original/unique
- Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS
If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.
Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah this is where I'm at. Actual movie level AI would be neat, but what we have right now is closer to a McDonald's toy pretending to be AI than the real deal.
I'd be overjoyed if we had decently functional AI that could be trusted to do the kind of jobs humans don't want to do, but instead we have hyped up autocomplete that's too stupid to reliably trust to run anything (see the shitshow of openclaw when they do).
There are places where machine learning has and will continue to push real progress but this whole "AI is on the road to AGI and then we'll never work again" bullshit is so destructive.
What we have now is "neat." It's freaking amazing it can do what it does. However it is not the AI from science fiction.
I think this is what causes this divide between the AI lovers and haters. What we have now is genuinely impressive even if largely nonfunctional. Its a confusing juxtaposition
Folks don't seem to realize what LLMs are, if they did then they wouldn't be wasting trillions trying to stuff them in everything.
Like, yes, it is a minor technological miracle that we can build these massively-multidimensional maps of human language use and use them to chart human-like vectors through language space that remain coherent for tens of thousands of tokens, but there's no way you can chain these stochastic parrots together to get around the fact that a computer cannot be held responsible, algorithms have no agency no matter how much you call them "agents", and the people who let chatbots make decisions must ultimately be culpable for them.
It's not "AI", it's a n-th dimensional globe and the ruler we use to draw lines on that globe. Like all globes, it is at best a useful fiction representing a limited perspective on a much wider world.
Like, yes, it is a minor technological miracle that we can build these massively-multidimensional maps of human language use and use them to chart human-like vectors through language space
Yeah. Like thats objectively a very interesting technological innovation. The issue is just how much its been overhyped.
The hype around AI would be warranted if it were, like, at the same level as the hype around the Rust programming language or something. Which is to say: it’s an useful innovation in certain limited domains which is worth studying and is probably really fascinating to some nerds. If we could have left the hype at that level then we would have been fine.
But then a bunch of CEOs and tech influencers started telling us that these things are going to cure cancer or aging and replace all white collar jobs by next year. Like okay buddy. Be realistic. This overhype turned something that was genuinely cool into this magical fantasy technology that doesn't exist.
Yeah, the hype is really leaning on that singularitarian angle and the investor class is massively overextended.
I'm glad that the general public is finally getting on down the hype cycle, this peak of inflated expectations has lasted way too long, but it should have been obvious three years ago.
Like, I get that I'm supposedly brighter and better educated than most folks, but I really don't feel like you need college level coursework in futures studies to be able to avoid obvious scams like cryptocurrency and "AI".
I feel like it has to be deliberate, a product of marketing effects, because some of the most interesting new technologies have languished in obscurity for years because their potential is disintermediative and wouldn't offer a path to further expanding the corporate dominion over computing.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Absolutely. Today's "AI" is as close to real AI as the shitty "hoverboard" we got a few years back is to the one from BttF. It's marketing bullshit. But that's not what bothers me.
What bothers me is that if we ever do develop machine persons, I have every reason to believe they will be treated as disposable property, abused, and misused, and all before they reach the public. If we're destroyed by a machine uprising, I have no doubt we will have earned it many times over.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(6 replies)
usually the AI and robots depicted in science fiction isn't, um...paralyzingly stupid. they might be evil, but they wouldn't tell someone to walk to the car wash to wash their car
edit: somewhat related, i highly recommend Of Monsters and Mainframes by Barbara Truelove. one main character is AI that i was full-on rooting for more and more throughout the book
Robots and AI are advancing. Its a slow grind. Say we do make some more breakthroughs, if we are relying on how people are tending to react, its obvious to me people will only be more upset when they do advance further.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
To me, it's like GMOs.
I trust the science behind GMOs. They work, and we can do amazing things with that technology.
I don't trust the profit seeking corporations that are selling the stuff to me. Doesn't matter what the technology is, Monsanto is gonna do Monstanto shit.
Makes it even more frustrating when you hear the anti-GMO people talk about why they're against it. Always completely irrational.
We have ai that isn't intelligent, hoverboards that have wheels, and other examples that I've forgotten that would really help me make my point.
Corporations have observed popular science fiction and have turned these ideas into marketing slogans.
other examples that I've forgotten that would really help me make my point.
Self driving cars that gleefully run down model children in school pick up simulations.
All you anti-AI luddites can bite my shiny metal Cybertruck bumper. I am saving SO MUCH TIME by having my vehicle hit schoolchildren on my behalf, I can finally work on engineering the perfect prompt to generate images of the kids all black Antifa uniforms, so people can tell that they were asking for it by how they were dressed.. Modern problems, modern solutions! Now, if only I could get Grok to stop making the kids' outfits so sexy...
(Cosmically massive amounts of sarcasm, which feels unnecessary to point out, but I've been wrong before)
load more comments
(1 replies)
If they were owned collectively so everyone could benefit it would be a lot easier to swallow. If it meant people could retire in comfort and not be destitute without a job that would help, too.
But a wrong answer machine that enriches assholes and convinces them they don’t need humans is not cool.
load more comments
(1 replies)
The worst part is that it's not really AI
It's LLMs and it can NEVER be AGI. Fundamentally it cant
It can if you have a different definition of AGI. EZ
load more comments
(1 replies)
The Dune books had the "Butlerian jihad" where humanity banned all thinking machines. As a kid I was like "who would ever ban cool shit like that?" Now I'm all "where the fuck is this Butler dude?"
Honestly same.
I always got excited about early AI use because it was actually innovative.
Like using AI to get better HDR photos, using AI for object recognition and Augmented Reality.
I was sure I'd always be an early adopter for it all.
Then within a day of ChatGPTs release, I saw the same social patterns as NFTs forming. I was like "this stupid chat bot fad will die out quickly, it's all slop frontends for the same chat bot".
I even made a point to differentiate LLMs from AI, because AI used to label something innovative.
And now I'm here vehemently avoiding LLMs. Cringing whenever I hear AI tacked on to a product name. Getting suspicious whenever I hear the word.
I am not rejecting them for being robots or AI, but because they are truly shitty garbage right now and nowhere near what I would actually like to see.
I want Data, not the ED-209.
WATCH THE AD. YOU HAVE 10 SECONDS TO COMPLY.
nervously
McDonalds! \o/
YOU HAVE 9 SECONDS TO COMPLY. 👌
🤣
Detroit: Become Human was actually an attempted insurrection secretly orchestrated by Cyberlife
If the Androids win, then they get voting rights then Cyberlife use their backdoor to control them and then easily win elections by keep making more Androids and have them vote for their candidate.
Now that's unrealistic, why do all of that when you can just win the contract for the electronic voting counters?
load more comments
(1 replies)
Well, it’s not AI. It’s theft of your digital data and unblinking surveillance. No reason not to be against that
load more comments
(3 replies)
If only real life AI was anything close to sci-fi AI. We expected cold, calculating computer psychopaths and we got overly enthusiastic yes men that get in a ditz if you ask it about non-existent emojis
It's like legalizing weed but making sure only wealthy cartels get to own them.
Which is PRECISELY what I expect to happen if Trump actually reschedules it. This is why marijuana needs to be descheduled and regulated like alcohol/tobacco.
If it is not from eccentric (or mad) scientists passion project but capitalism hellscape my approval rate stays low.
Even for a sci fi l read where owning their own computer was illegal (and the protag labeled as terrorist trying to do so) it was government authoritarian stuff, not artificial scarcity and push to subscription or government-megacorp corruption :(
load more comments
(1 replies)
You shouldn't just reject things on a visceral level. Thankfully with AI you don't have to as there so many actual reasons why it's a bad idea.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Same, I guess. But then I also didn't really expect the "AI" to be a bunch of overhyped nonsense snake oil bullshit, with tremendous practical and ethical problems... so I've got to say I feel pretty comfy with the stance.
I always appreciated the concept of the Butlerian Jihad. What I underestimated was the absolute fervor I would feel for it. It's a burning yearning feeling. Deep in my soul.
I always thought cybernetics would be cool. I forgot they'd come from companies like HP that have a subscription service for them and if you don't pay it they take it back.
Feels like a precursor to Repo. Throw some Cyberpunk 2077 in for good measure.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I keep thinking about the first ep of Battlestar Galactica (2004) where everything in the ship is hard wired and closed-circuit and realizing that that's more like what my personal sci-fi future is going to look like.
It's having grown up on sci-fi that has allowed me to see that LLMs are not "AI", so there's no surprise I'm against "imitation AI".
Is it the AI itself? Or is it that it’s being forced down your throat despite being an alpha-level (in programming, alpha means very early release with lots of bugs and missing features, and nowhere near production quality) software?
Personally, I like the idea of AI. And occasionally I will find a use for it; i.e. summarizing long texts, or giving me pointers for a complex software problem I need an example for visualizing a potential solution. I do also use an LLM for code completion, and it is actually useful more often than not.
But, this idea that it should write my code for me, or be integrated so deeply in an operating system and other integral software (browsers, email, and search engines), is certainly a line too far and dangerously ignorant of companies to be doing right now.
Maybe if/when they have actual sentience, but right now I have no problem calling the poor excuse we have currently clankers, as they rightly deserve
i dont hate them im just disappointed
I thought we'd at least get cool shit like Metal Fears or maybe a mister handy but nooooo we hafta get some slop tastic creepy looking shit. Stop making robots look vaguely human, make them look like cats I like cats far more than people and may feel bad about throwing one into a river if it looks like a cat.
And in cat form the vague condescension would be fitting
Maybe, when we get actual artificial intelligence, and not this glorified auto-correct, we'll be more on board?
I always felt the term "humanist" was woefully inadequate and discounts other sentient life, be it organic or otherwise, on earth or otherwise.
Even I hate "AI" (or more specifically: the bullshitting around the current and near-future tech currently being called that)
view more: next ›