this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2026
937 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

82252 readers
5176 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Despite building an increasingly screen-focused world, billionaire tech leaders are keeping their own children away from the tech they helped create.

As far back as 2010, Apple cofounder Steve Jobs told a New York Times reporter his kids had never used an iPad and that, “We limit how much technology our kids use at home.”

Since then, the trend of Silicon Valley billionaires keeping their families away from technology has become even more pronounced, thanks in part to the rise of social media and short-form video.

At the 2024 Aspen Ideas Festival, early Facebook investor and billionaire Peter Thiel joined Chen among the ranks of tech leaders who are setting strict limits on screens. Thiel said he only lets his two young children use screens for an hour-and-a-half per week, a revelation that prompted audible gasps from the audience.

Other tech CEOs, including Microsoft’s Bill Gates, Snap’s Evan Spiegel, and Tesla’s Elon Musk, have also spoken about limiting their children’s access to devices. Gates has said he did not give his children smartphones until age 14 and banned phones at the dinner table entirely. Snap CEO Evan Spiegel, in 2018, said he limits his child to the same 1.5 hours per week of screen time as Thiel. And finally, Musk, who bought the social media company X, formerly Twitter, in 2022, said it “might’ve been a mistake” to not set any rules on social media for his children.

Yet, as the trials against social media companies continue and country after country moves toward legislating what Silicon Valley’s billionaires have quietly practiced for years, the private behavior of the world’s most powerful tech figures stands in contrast to what they’re promoting and building

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mrnobody@reddthat.com 160 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Hmmm it appears they understand how evil all the tech companies are, harvesting data to the fullest extent. Spying, influencing, etc.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 91 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Oh they absolutely know. Zuck's Meta is on trial right now not only because Instagram creates an addiction for kids, but because it was made delibarately, on purpose. Kids addictron was the goal.

They've always known. They just don't care for the rest of humanity.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Look to the masters, the tobacco industry with additives to make it more addictive (been a while since I researched it and that's the one that popped up, but they spent 60+ years making it more addictive).

Social media speedran it with something apparently innocuous ('they trust me, stupid fucks'), and a bunch of corrupt psychologists (and marketers/advertisers also known as corrupt psychologists). Do no harm my ass, wait, that doesn't apply to psychologists, wait again, that's more like guidelines for doctors (not an actual vow in most places).

Next bill of rights / constitution needs to address this specifically, there's a reason why quacks have a special hatred (and if there were one, a special hell)...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 87 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Does musk even see any of his kids often enough to set rules?

[–] slackarr@piefed.ca 33 points 1 week ago

not if his kids have any say in the matter

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago

I can imagine he has access to crazy surveillance of them and their mothers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 62 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Our technology is perfectly safe and harmless for all ages!"

"So you would let your own children use it?"

"Nooo. No no no no no no. God no."

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 12 points 1 week ago

"Are you kidding? I KNOW how addicting we make that shit. I don't want my kids anywhere near it."

[–] db2@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago (5 children)

The most disturbing part is these ghouls reproduced.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You look at the ~~eugenicist~~ natalist couples who worship Elon Musk and you realize they are indeed ghouls, and they treat their children like non-sentient garbage. Hitting them during interviews in public. Imagine what they do in private.

[–] Uranhjort@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Leave it to natalists to make extinction seem the better option.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] shiftymccool@piefed.ca 50 points 1 week ago

Eat the rich

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's so much Zone of Interest.

image

[–] ravenaspiring@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

YouTube cofounder Steve Chen said at a talk at the Stanford Graduate School of Business last year that he wouldn’t want his kids consuming only short-form content, noting that it might be better to limit kids to videos longer than 15 minutes.

I hope this is introduced at the LA trial in some form that demonstrates the why.

I should not be amazed, but I still am, at the entire lack of morality that tech entrepreneurs have post dotcom bursting.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They're subhumans with no morality or code of ethics whose sights are set on more and more wealth, spiralling them further into the depths of depravity and the cardinal sin of greed.

Greed begets more greed, but unlike gluttony and wrath, the billionaires' deterioration doesn't manifest itself physically, so they allow themselves to become evermore corrupted by it until they become a fountain of disease, rotting and decaying everything around them.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I say bullshit, these people aren't involved enough in their kids lives to even know if their "1 hour a day" or whatever rules are happening. Their kids are absolutely doing whatever the fuck they want.

[–] NannerBanner@literature.cafe 17 points 1 week ago

That's what the paid 24/7 nanny is for.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 week ago

This behavior seems to be very similar to NFL stars and how they never wanted their kids to play football.

Everyone involved knows how dangerous social media/football is and many of them are in positions to actually do something about it. But because it benefits them personally, they won't even rock the boat.

[–] Twongo@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Musk is the most Twitter addicted person I am aware of.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LuceVendemiaire@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

everyone talking about "phone bad" meanwhile im reminded of how abusive parents tend to track and watch everything kids do online. Like have we forgotten all of a sudden these people are extremely linked to the child rapist to end all child rapists???

I'm extremely hesitant to hand it to Thiel, Gates and Elon, especially in anything relating to how children should be treated.

[–] Eximius@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Vaguely agree with the sentiment here.

Every single person I know who had helicopter parents ended up... a bit odd... in a bad way.

[–] deltaspawn0040@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I love how Elon Musk was the sole fuck up in these examples

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thats because he has like 14 kids with numerous women and doesn't actually parent them.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Musk doesn't even remember his kids' names except maybe that one he named by smashing the keyboard with his fist

[–] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What about the one he used as a shield? Or are they the same?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (13 children)

And they've convinced you that it's a-okay for your kids to be using these products, in full knowledge of the harm they cause.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago

Never get high on your own supply

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 11 points 1 week ago

That social rot you smell? It’s you. You’re the social rot.

[–] Cantaloupe@lemmy.fedioasis.cc 10 points 1 week ago

Wow what a surprise. I can't imagine anyone better to know how unsafe something is other than the lead architects themselves.

[–] Antaeus@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

That should be enough evidence for the rest of the world…

[–] OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

This isn't new. I remember fifteen years ago some Silicon Valley app engineers forbade their children from playing the games that were being developed.

It's because they're engineered to use your psychology against you. This is by design.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I used to work at a "Big Data" company that sold browsing data to a ton of companies. One problem the dev team ran into was that the standard ad-blocking plugins that they'd install on their machines also blocked our stuff, so my support team would have to inform them of bugs.

Lots of fun stories from that job.

[–] MadhuGururajan@programming.dev 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

First of all these billionaires can afford to replace for their kids; what social media is with actual socialising that is destroyed by fear, nimbyism, and systematic destruction of third places for normal people. that's what private cities and walled off estates are for. They will continue to enjoy the fruits of socialism while selling capitalism for everybody else.

This is not a force to be triffled with or dismissed as so easy to escape from.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kubiac@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 week ago

Well, they know why. And they know that most of the people are stupid as a stone. This is how they made their money.

[–] lmmarsano@group.lt 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Other tech CEOs, including Microsoft’s Bill Gates, Snap’s Evan Spiegel, and Tesla’s Elon Musk, have also spoken about limiting their children’s access to devices. Gates has said he did not give his children smartphones until age 14 and banned phones at the dinner table entirely. Snap CEO Evan Spiegel, in 2018, said he limits his child to the same 1.5 hours per week of screen time as Thiel.

Seems like these failures suing them & demanding government paternalism

Yet, as the trials against social media companies continue and country after country moves toward legislating what Silicon Valley’s billionaires have quietly practiced for years

don't know how to effectively limit access/use parental controls as tech CEOs claim to do.

load more comments (1 replies)

Fucking degenerate assholes, pushing drugs knowing full well how harmful it is.

[–] jagermo@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Half an hour per weekday and an hour on weekends with the switch, plus strict rules on what als can be used. No roblox.

But we flood our kids with books or comics. If they want to read a book, well make it happen

Kids are fine with it. Boredom sparks creativity.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Even when I was a kid, in the 80s and 90s, I spent plenty of time playing NES, computer and watching TV. This was of course long before social media.

I don’t see how you could possibly limit a kid to 1.5 hr screen time per week. How do we define screen time? If it’s only social media on phones or tablets, then that’s probably okay. But if you are including console, computer gaming, tv, then I don’t see how that’s even possible. (And of course now most games have an online component, so the line gets blurry there.)

It’s the shitty “social” aspect of online that is harming children, not the concept of a screen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

Because they know their kids will have an advantage over the stupefied masses if they can keep them unmezmerizes.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What, Musks too? He's not known to have much to do with family.

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

But he is known to talk out his ass

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jojowakaki@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

There's gotta be a modern version of Fortunate son brewing somewhere with a cybertruck whizzing sound as the intro.

[–] PotatoLibre@feddit.it 5 points 1 week ago

Tech lords are among the most hated people on the planet.

"Dad, why people think you're a self absordeb, pathetic, nazi snowflake???"

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

banned phones at the dinner table entirely

I would everyone is doing this. Sitting down to eat together once a day and talk isn't something only billionaires can afford.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

Duh. You think the CEO of Kraft feeds his kids mac and cheese from a box?

load more comments
view more: next ›