Is there more than ONE picture of this monster trump appointee?
this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
333 points (99.7% liked)
politics
28518 readers
2956 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It's probably her official portrait thay isnin the public record. Other stuff could risk invasion of privacy claims or some sort of IP stuff.
Wasn’t the government’s position basically “well you didn’t give Trump the documents he stole!”?
At this point, fuck em. Just release it.
I would like to congratulate Aileen Cannon for her future career as a member of the Supreme Court. 🫲🍊🫱
Cannon, who in 2024 dismissed the case after concluding that Smith was unlawfully appointed, said the release of the report would present a “manifest injustice” to Trump and his two co-defendants.
Corruption at its core. No conflicts of interest to see here.
"Manifest Injustice" sounds like a spell all the Republican magic users cast after every long rest.
After a very long SUCCULENT CHINESE MEAL
Can this move be appealed?
I am so sick of seeing her fucking name... She's not a judge she's been Trump's personal defense lawyer the entire time...
Just wait until he puts her on the Supreme Court after Alito retires.
Do it anyway. Consequences for violating court orders don't exist anymore.
Only if you got the (R)
iT’s BiDeNz FauLt!1!!
Jenosideeeeezzzzz!!
heil putin
Hot favourite for the next SCOTUS seat for sure, though perhaps Thomas would be disappointed in losing the crown of the most corrupt SCOTUS judge.
I look forward to when Cannon is shot out of a Cannon.
No soul behind those eyes. Jfc
Has anyone made a site where it’s two pictures and you have to guess which picture is a Trump appointee, or maybe which one is super right wing? ‘Cause like… —and no, I’m not talking about phrenology or whatever racist science rabbit hole I might be going parallel to— it just feels like the worst ones have the deadest eyes or the most vain of portraits.
I know this isn’t a good example in the headline, but I’ve never seen her before and I could just tell I wouldn’t like her.
A disproportionate number of them are likely true psychopaths, without functional empathy or conscience. That is certainly my theory about the dead eyes.
It's the eyes. She's got the crazy Kenneth Copeland eyes. Amy Coney Barrett does too.
Theres a 'dle game where you are given the picture of a us politician and you guess if theyre blue or red
Someone should just leak an ip on the dark web and say that there is a weak password. And let nature run its course
She's a loose cannon but a horrible officer of the law.
You’re off YOUR case, Chief!
I see what u did there
I'm sure she has his swimmers stuck between her teeth.
There is no justice in the regimes just-us department.
ffs lady his pp is too short to pleasure your musty cobwebbed troll hole, you can stop worshipping his ken doll coin purse with BBs that never descended now
In the future I hope for, the only reason the judicial reform bill wouldn't have her name on it is because Clarence Thomas exists.