this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
1044 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

82252 readers
5294 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 1 points 22 minutes ago (1 children)

Ban it, do it, we are not gonna cry!

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

Unfortunately, the other half of the people who don't want it banned have all the political capital.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 18 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

Shouldn't they want it banned because it already broke the law? How many lines have to be crossed before anyone does anything?

Anarchism for the rich(law does not affect them), rugged police state for the poor,

[–] BigJohnnyHines@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 hours ago

I’m not clicking the link to read this but these sort of headlines are often a result of their survey intentionally wording things like this to spin the narrative. Anyone who does in fact want it banned immediately would still say yes to the question. I’d suspect there are many such folks across Europe.

[–] projektilski@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 3 hours ago

I want it banned regardless :D

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 5 points 4 hours ago

i wish this was worldwide

[–] lithiumground@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I think all USA/Israel social media application must be banned.

[–] GameOverFlow@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

What is a Israel sozial media application?

[–] lithiumground@lemmy.world 1 points 2 minutes ago

All USA social media indirectly product of Israel .

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 8 minutes ago* (last edited 8 minutes ago)

TikTok now that Ellison owns it.

Facebook is also joined at the hip with the Zionists.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 hours ago

American ones it seems like. American politicians sure love Israel for some reason.

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 22 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

100% of this European want X banned without further ado.

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 3 points 5 hours ago

~~Yesterday~~the moment the sink carrying cancer walked in.

[–] pirate2377@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 hours ago
[–] sveltecider@lemmy.ca 11 points 12 hours ago

I want it banned here too.

[–] arch@programming.dev 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Ditch it.It will have 0 to none effect of EU. And Mr.NaciSalute won't get broke.Mastodon is the way.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 8 points 6 hours ago

I think you are mistaken. It will have a huge positive impact on the EU.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

banning this website would be super good for Blue sky and mastodon

[–] sveltecider@lemmy.ca 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

lol people will go to meta threads first, not that.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 5 hours ago

One step at a time...

[–] Prikkeres@feddit.nl 22 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

And ban Facebook too. It’s been breaking the law a lot longer!

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 hours ago

So you suggest that people should see others in real life? Out and about? What are you, a savage?

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 2 points 5 hours ago

Just imagine how funny it would be if people would just ditch all that shit.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 21 points 16 hours ago

i want it banned even if it doesnt

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

More than half are ok with any company breaking the law?

[–] Tja@programming.dev 4 points 5 hours ago

I imagine some of them are okay with fines, or strongly worded letters.

[–] nao@sh.itjust.works 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

According to a new YouGov survey, a vast majority of respondents in Germany, France, Spain, Italy and Poland (60-78%) think that the EU should take further action against X if it does not address breaches to European law brought forward by the Commission last year [1]. The majority of those (62%-73%) who wanted further action – and 47% of total participants – want X to be banned from the EU if it refuses to address these breaches [2]

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

20% being fine with it is still worrying to me.

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 5 points 14 hours ago

Those are rookie numbers.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 18 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 147 points 1 day ago (18 children)

I think if any other (smaller) site were continually posting CSAM without moderation, it would be banned. What's different about X? The fact that Elon Musk runs it and he's in with a powerful dictator?

At some point you have to admit the CSAM is not the problem, it's the person running it, whether they have the power to stop you/fight back or not.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›