this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2026
18 points (84.6% liked)

News

36439 readers
3291 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kittykillinit@lemy.lol 5 points 21 hours ago

You can make your own slop bowl at home for a fraction of the price.

The main ingredients in a Chipotle meal are beans and rice...

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

At Chipotle, US$3 for guacamole is too much. and the portions got smaller. the value is no longer there. $20 meal per person with no beverage is too high!

[–] socsa@piefed.social 19 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Good. Rice/grain bowls are fucking burrito nihilism and the worst thing millennials have done. If you want a fucking burrito then order one. Take it with you and eat it on the go. It's a sustainable, self contained, portable meal, unlike its deconstructed evil cousin which involves plastic and utensils and you can't even eat it while walking. Seriously fuck these things so hard. I fucking hate how they have completely killed burrito culture and innovation because some delicate fucking tryhards refuse to eat with their hands as God intended.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Good. Rice/grain bowls are fucking burrito nihilism and the worst thing millennials have done.

That large tortilla adds another 300 calories by itself, which is about 25% of the calories of a large burrito. I like to skip those extra tortilla calories. A bowl does that.

[–] AuroraZzz@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

Yea. Came here to say this. The tortilla is the most unhealthy part of the burrito

[–] kittykillinit@lemy.lol 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Oh no, more energy!

The horror!

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

This may come as a shock to you, but most of the people in the western world have an energy surplus which creates other health risks. The most logical way to address this is to consume less energy, but here we are with other people being upset by my choice to not eat something.

[–] kittykillinit@lemy.lol 0 points 7 hours ago

Hey, at least you're paying less for getting less energy.

[–] GorGor@startrek.website 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

if you look to Chipotle for this "burrito culture" you talk of you are already lost.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Chipotle was only one of the bigger players, but there were tons of smaller local burrito shops which simply don't exist anymore, at least not on the east coast. Maybe things are different in California and Texas, but like I said in another comment, my college town had two amazing local burrito places which I ate at all the time, and they both went out of business in the mid/late 2000s and were unironically replaced by a Cava and a bubble tea shop. If you can't tell, I am still bitter about this. The children are wrong and they need to understand why.

From my perspective Chipotle was just a bellwether anyway. I remember all of a sudden around like 2004 or 2005 when it just seemed to switch from people ordering 80% burritos to 80% bowls overnight. I don't even remember them advertising bowls heavily until after the (objectively incorrect) shift in consumer preference. It killed the local places, it killed the "overstuffed" wars, and now it seems like your average chipotle cook can't actually roll a burrito properly because nobody orders them.

[–] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Some people don't want the tortilla dude. Whether it's to avoid the extra, little-nutrition calories, avoid gluten or the extra carbs plenty of people prefer to skip it. You eat how you wanna eat and I'll eat how I wanna eat.

[–] GorGor@startrek.website 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I'm spoiled here in CA, we got some really legit spots. Did the birra craze hit the east coast too?

[–] socsa@piefed.social 1 points 23 hours ago

Definitely. I can get legit goat or beef birria, al pastor, and sopes easier than a burrito these days. I'm not kidding when I say they are all but extinct in my area, and it's all because of the stupid fucking slop bowls.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm sorry but "burrito culture" kind of took me out of it.

I agree with your point though.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago

There was definitely a culture surrounding burritos in the late 90s, with all the different fast casual Mexican restaurants competing for who had the biggest or most overstuffed burrito. And it was also the prime drunk food up there with pizza - I remember a local college dive having "the dumpster" with french fries and mozz sticks. In popular media, burritos were generally trendy, and now it's basically just disappeared.

[–] overthere@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

Well said, man. Well said.

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 9 points 2 days ago

Wait, consumers tightening spending? Isn't that something that only happens in a recession that we're not in?

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The archive[.]is service you're using changes saved content and weaponizes visitors to DDoS a blog.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archive.today

Around 11 January 2026, archive.today inserted malicious JavaScript code in its CAPTCHA page to involve visitors in a DDoS attack against Gyrovague. Over the following weeks, the archive.today blog posted public criticisms of Patokallio, accusing him of doxing the website's operator, and engaged in personal attacks against him. Emails released by Patokallio include archive.today threatening him with AI pornography. On 20 February 2026, English Wikipedia banned links to archive.today, citing the DDoS attack against Patokallio and evidence that archived content was tampered with to insert Patokallio's name.

Article refers to .today but .is is the same service. There's a list on the article sidebar.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So nobody should use that site anymore? Do you have an alternative?

It's not something I'd use at least, can't decide for others. Could try one listed here though.