this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
705 points (99.4% liked)

News

36457 readers
4020 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lindsey Graham, the veteran Republican senator who has been pushing for war against Iran for decades, has issued a dire warning to the Iranian government, saying it was worth spending money to “take this regime down”.

“When this regime goes down, we are going to have a new Middle East, and we are going [to] make a tonne of money,” Graham, a longtime proponent of US military intervention abroad, told Fox News on Sunday.

Graham, who has been one of the Trump administration’s most vocal supporters of Israel and the war against Iran, appeared to suggest that the US abduction of Venezuela’s left-wing leader Nicolas Maduro and the attack on Iran were launched to gain control over each country’s oil supplies.

“Venezuela and Iran have 31 percent of the world’s oil reserves. We’re going to have a partnership with 31 percent of the known reserves. This is China’s nightmare. This is a good investment,” said Graham.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rarsamx@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I almost throw up when I heard it.

"Let's kill people by the thousands. It will make us money"

Primitive baboons.

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 8 points 19 hours ago

Yup. I used to think Lindsay was just a clueless idiot. I mean he is, but think carefully about what he said there . . . the utter contempt it shows for the ordinary people on both sides who will be maimed and killed for his greed. That is just 100% concentrated evil.

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 14 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

They rape children and will go to prison for life if they don't keep it up. Nothing should be shocking they will sell their own grandmas to stay free and unaccountable.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Let's be real I don't know very many Democrats who are picking voluntary service these days.

Now, when a draft comes about, I'm sure they'll figure out a way to target primarily Democrats and BIPoC's...but we aren't there yet.

I guess i dont understand what point you're making?

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“Venezuela and Iran have 31 percent of the world’s oil reserves. We’re going to have a partnership with 31 percent of the known reserves. This is China’s nightmare. This is a good investment,” said Graham.

You don't have "partnerships" with people whose countries you've bombed and invaded and whose resources you are stealing. Those people hate you and want to kill you. You fucking fool.

There's no way to hold territory without boots on the ground and another Forever War.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Not to mention what good does it do. China is moving to electric vehicles, and solar power. Sure you'll want to use gas powered ships for now, but half of the ships traversing oceans are simply moving fuel around, which won't be needed as the electricity doesn't need to be shipped if it comes from solar. Will large shipments still be needed, of course, but wouldn't it be against the U.S. own interest to have high oil costs for the country shipping them items. As in every item would cost more for American consumers to have it shipped, it would be like putting a tariff on Chinese goods.... Oh... I forgot making the American worker pay more to line the pockets of the oil companies is what they want, got it.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 day ago

War-mongering, conquering, and looting the spoils. Some things never change.

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think that might be an insult…to the prostitutes.

They are, did any of you get rich from the war on terror, or any other war for that matter?

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 26 points 1 day ago

Who is this "we" that keep talking about? I haven't seen Jack shit.

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Why is their tonne in kilograms? That's weird, Americans use pounds, it's almost like this was written by a foreign agent, eh? I once learned a story from my Ukrainian coworker many years ago about a kremlin spy working in the US government, and he was only discovered because he crossed his 7s like they would in Russia, not like an American, as they do not cross their sevens.

Imagine this regime trying to catch a mole 🤣

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 1 points 16 hours ago

Interesting

I cross sevens, put no loop in two, complete the triangle in four and fully hook six and nine because I’m a surveyor

[–] treesquid@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Lots of Americans cross their sevens. Not the majority, but I see it all the time.

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Because you are a multicultural melting pot, like Canada. This was like from the 70's the guy was old. Americans did not do this, this comes from European and more specifically eastern block countries and has been adopted by others as well I'm sure. I'm not from there, but I think they look nicer with a little hook and a cross. This is where the story came from, he saw me writing and broke into his story.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 37 points 1 day ago (3 children)

“Venezuela and Iran have 31 percent of the world’s oil reserves. We’re going to have a partnership with 31 percent of the known reserves."

Kinda saying the quiet part loud there, aren't you, Lindsey? In prior decades the government at least pretended its wars were about anything other than oil...

"This is China’s nightmare."

No it's not. China has been ambracing the future by investing in renewables. It's not stuck in the past, and it doesn't give a shit if you are. The oil economy is dead and dying. It will be replaced, and at this rate the US won't be ready for it. China is laughing.

"This is a good investment”

War isn't a fucking investment! Are dollar signs all you see?

[–] sirscooter@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oil is still very useful. Especially when we stop burning it to make cars go forward or to fertilize crops.

A mostly electric future is a safer place

[–] hydroxycotton@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 16 hours ago

Another point I don't see brought up often is how much we use oil for basically everything else. Clothing (polyester), packaging, flooring, so many consumer goods globally are made from polymers. I hate it but the oil problem doesn't go away with just transitioning to renewables for energy.

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

China has never produced a lot of energy relying on oil in the first place. They did improve a lot adding renewables to the pie, but sadly, they still heavily rely on coal.

[–] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

China has a 100 year plan, the orange dotard himself doesn't know what he is going to be doing in the next 100 minutes...

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

No it’s not. China has been ambracing the future by investing in renewables. It’s not stuck in the past, and it doesn’t give a shit if you are. The oil economy is dead and dying. It will be replaced, and at this rate the US won’t be ready for it. China is laughing.

image

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The post jimmy carter dream of the american corporate elite is finally being realized.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

The humans on this planet really are going to incinerate themselves over little green pieces of paper.

This whole timeline feels like Vogon poetry

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 231 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Fuck you "we." "We" who!? When oil companies profit "we" don't see a fucking dime of that money especially with your corporate "taxation" bullshit where they get loophole after loophole to pay nothing.

[–] gatohaus@eviltoast.org 5 points 1 day ago

(a la thejuicemedia) Oh sweetie..

Political English is tricky.
The "we" in, "we are going to make lots of money", has absolutely no relation to the "we" in, "we have to make sacrifices".

Other terms that often confuse proletarians: beautiful justice tax cuts freedom security unprecedented elites transparency socialist free speech patriot ...

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 91 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Well, he means himself and his friends, which is what all politicians have always meant when they say "we" are going to benefit from their decisions.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Ah it's the 2000s again. They'll top it off with a global financial crisis. Probably the AI bubble collapsing or succeeding and destroying all the jobs.

Maybe the Americans will elect an Obama 2.0 after. Maybe not. There wasn't MAGA last time. More likley it'll be president mecha-Hitler or something this time around.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Textbook psychopath. A truly immoral, sadistic, bloodthirsty bastard of the sort Hunter Thompson would conjure to represent the foulest archetype of American politics.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Thompson has said that as much as he hated Nixon, he would vote for him against Bush and Cheney. If he learned that USians elected Trump just one time after the 2015-16 campaign, his head would explode on its own.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

"He was so liberal! Look at what he was running on. He started the EPA. He opened China. He gave 18-year-olds the vote. His issues were education, drugs, women, minorities, youth involvement, ending the draft, and improving the environment. John Kerry couldn't have run on this! What would I give for a Nixon?"

https://nymag.com/news/politics/22322/

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Wammityblam@lemmy.world 117 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Profits over people once again.

Republicans are genuinely traitors to the US. It’s hard to put into words how much I hate them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's no way he said tonne with the e at the end like that.

[–] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Shoddy reporting by Al Jazeera. Graham was clearly speaking American, not English.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 80 points 2 days ago (4 children)

No blood for oil. It was evil and stupid in the 00s, and it's worse today now that oil is increasingly replaceable

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 78 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (13 children)

Meanwhile, China has been hard focused on renewables and lowering their need for oil.

Good plan Lindsey...if it was 2006 not 2026.

These old fucks are still thinking like it's 1986.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lindsey graham is a child rapist and murderer who is owned by AIPAC

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 87 points 2 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›