this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
224 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

82516 readers
4469 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The publishers allege the shadow library is facilitating "staggering" levels of piracy. While the site's owners are not likely to put up a defense, the publishers' main goal appears to be to obtain an injunction that can apply further pressure on domain registrars and registries.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 120 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Cool. Now that the Tech companies have pilfered it they're going to shut it down. There are a ton of books on there that aren't even worth money anymore. They're out of print or 1-2 editions behind the scholarly current.

This is just bullshit

I got access to a bunch of pay-walled scholarly papers on Anna's

If you're concerned about the site shutting down, seed some of their torrents from their site so that it's easier to re-launch it if it happens

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

But it’s fair use: I’m using it to train my AI (actual intelligence)

[–] Blueoaky@mander.xyz 84 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Elsevier? The company that makes money from public funded research? The one that does basically nothing and earns tons of money on the back of tax payers and free labor of authors, reviewers and editors.

Hopefully open access policies will bring an end to the exploitative business model of science "publisher".

[–] testaccount372920@piefed.zip 8 points 1 day ago

That can only happen if we stop giving a shit about impact factors (and remove it from legal hiring requierements in some countries) and when big name PIs stop giving excuses like 'I want my research to be read' as if that wouldn't happen in the journals that are more appropriate for the topic they publish in.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago

So when Facebook wins their case that basically says "it's only copyright theft when ordinary people do it", Anna's Archive gets a pass, right? I'm assuming Facebook stole some of their training data from there, so fruit of the poisoned tree and all that jazz.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 66 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why aren't they suing AI then?

[–] ebolapie@lemmy.world 64 points 2 days ago

Because those companies can fight back, and besides, they went to college with the guys running them.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

They are? The suits from major publishers were all over the news when they were started in early 2025.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 42 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe they should try suing the businesses that actually have tons of venture capital money to take.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 14 points 2 days ago

Why do that and risk actually losing, when you can go after the small guy and send a message to the plebs?

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 22 points 2 days ago

Well, what now??

[–] kittykillinit@lemy.lol 30 points 2 days ago

obtain an injunction that can apply further pressure on domain registrars and registries.

Fuck the DNS.

We can just have a public page that has their IP address and connect directly using that.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

RIP to a real one. I read a lot of books because of Anna's.

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 48 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You do realize that they don't actually know who runs the website, right? This is a lawsuit against a bunch of John Does. Nothing has changed, AA still exists, and likely will exist long after those lawyers doing the suing retire.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 59 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Prox@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

Great read. Thank you for sharing!

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago

There are plenty of mirrors, they aren't going anywhere.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 18 points 2 days ago
  1. Go to Anna's Archive Wikipedia page
  2. Look at one of the 3 different urls published
[–] kittykillinit@lemy.lol 17 points 2 days ago

If they have money to sue, they must not be hurting too badly from piracy.

[–] SavageCoconut@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Couldn't they just go to Tor like zlib did?