this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
307 points (99.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

30436 readers
4002 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 48 minutes ago

Took me a second to figure out what was wrong with the email... I choked on a laugh when I saw the IP

What a bizarre, narrow window of knowledge that person must have

[–] python@lemmy.world 3 points 39 minutes ago

Ok I admit I didn't get it at first because I expected the joke to be that the IP is 127.0.0.1 and didn't look closer at the digits

[–] gergolippai@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

no shit they don't recognize that IP :-D but hey, they also single handedly solved the IP4 address space crisis!

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 33 points 9 hours ago

New address space unlocked

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 76 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It's not often you see IPv5

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 22 points 9 hours ago

It's good to see someone in this thread who knows what an IPv5 address looks like:

IPv5 addresses consist of four hextets a 16bit each.  For the visual
representation, those grouping are used.  The hextets might be
written in decimal, separated by dot '.' characters, or as
hexadecimal numbers, separated by colon ':'.

It's long past time to start replacing our IPv4.1 deployments!

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 27 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

For the uninitiated, the joke is:

spoilerEach number should has a maximum value of 255.

[–] imjustmsk@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

The fact that I have a test in school today, and this is probable questiom in it, and this post reminded me of it,  thanks I guess?

EDIT: wait, so each number should be maximum of 255? Why did I think it was just the last numbe :|

anyway thanks again for the unsolicited coincidental heads up

[–] thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works 46 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

In addition to what others have already posted, I suspect that this might be an attempt to evade spam/phishing filters that are looking for an IP address with a specific regular expression. Having a fake IP address that doesn’t match the traditional ^((25\[0-5]|(2\[0-4]|1\d|\[1-9]|)\d)\\.?\b){4}$ format might let this message slip through.

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago

And it hooks tech illiterate people, avoiding people who know something's wrong. The perfect target.

[–] slampisko@lemmy.world 18 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Sorry, that's my IP. I was trying something

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 120 points 16 hours ago (6 children)

I often assume this kind of thing is part of an effort to filter for idiots

If you know that's an invalid IP address, you're probably less likely to fall for the scam after the scammer has put the setup work in. So if they filter you out before a scammer has to spend any actual effort on you, that means more time they can spend scamming people who might be more likely to fall for it

That's why these things often have egregious spelling errors and other seemingly obvious red flags

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 45 minutes ago

I never thought of it like that before. I wonder how common this intent actually is...

[–] zo0@programming.dev 49 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Just because I know what a valid IP is doesn't mean I'm not an idiot 😎

[–] toynbee@piefed.social 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Let's see you write a regex for one, then we'll decide.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 hours ago

Why would anyone want to do that when there are dozens on stackoverflow?

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 2 points 13 hours ago

That's not the probability they are looking for.

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 46 points 16 hours ago

I do believe that is confirmed canon.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It's possible in general, but I don't think that's what's going on specifically here; not many people read IP addresses in such detail to notice such things at first glance.

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It’s exactly what is happening, they’re filtering out people who know what an IP address is and can contain so that they get fewer time wasters.

[–] communism@lemmy.ml 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The point schnurrito was making is that even if you know what an IP address is and what are valid or invalid IP addresses, a lot of people won't read the IP address. They'll just see numbers and skim over them. Even if you're keeping eyes peeled for scams, most people don't have their IP address memorised off the top of their heads so they wouldn't be looking to check if the IP address looks right or not.

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

And the point I’m making is that they’re doing it to filter out people who know and pay attention. Real simple stuff.

[–] communism@lemmy.ml -3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Then I don't think that would be the most effective way because most people aren't paying that much attention, independently of knowledge. What would tip me off to it being a scam would be other parts of the email.

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 12 hours ago

You, maybe, someone else, maybe not.

They put in a lot of flags like that, of varying obviousness, to filter out as many people as possible who would be savvy enough to not fall for the scam overall. It’s not just one clue, it never is.

[–] teddypolice@feddit.org 14 points 15 hours ago

Movies and TV shows actually do it this way to prevent actual machines getting group hugged.

Like in that one X-Files episode, where the Lone Gunmen hack into an invalid IP.

[–] sniggleboots@europe.pub 7 points 16 hours ago

It's also why there's usually bad spelling or grammar in those e-mails as well

[–] First_Thunder@lemmy.zip 136 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

Oh yeah, that’s the new hexadecimal IPV8

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 55 points 16 hours ago
[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 hours ago

IPv4 was easy to remember. IPv6 made it very hard. This implies that IPv8 has to be base64 encoded.

[–] mergingapples@lemmy.world 13 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Hello, I am apparently an idiot. What is wrong with that IP address that people can tell it's an immediate phishing scam?

[–] Turious@leaf.dance 30 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

IP addresses can't have segment numbers going over 255.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 7 points 13 hours ago

Yeah, IPv4 addresses use four bytes. Those four bytes are represented as four decimal numbers, separated by dots. And a byte can only represent the decimal values 0–255.

[–] dracs@programming.dev 25 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] toynbee@piefed.social 3 points 9 hours ago

I try to avoid "this" style comments, but I genuinely don't know how else to respond to this one. It was hilarious. I literally (by which I actually mean "literally") laughed out loud.

[–] ghodawalaaman@programming.dev 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

wait what? I feel like I am left behind in the tech. I only know about ipv4 and ipv6 😭😭😭

[–] tyler@programming.dev 46 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

They’re making a joke. The numbers in the IP are way too high for v4, but the format isn’t v6, so it’s a “new range” of v8.

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 5 points 16 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 hours ago

In the drawer right next to IPv5

[–] teddypolice@feddit.org 7 points 15 hours ago

at 192.512.512.10.0/42.

[–] shawn@thagoat.org 11 points 11 hours ago (2 children)
[–] eah@programming.dev 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Neither 867:5309:: nor 867::5309 appears to be allocated. Do IPv6 blocks work like car license plates where you can pay more to get a vanity plate of your choice or do you just get what you get?

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago

That cancer support line should buy this one also

[–] saltnotsugar@lemmy.world 24 points 16 hours ago

Jesus Christ, that’s Jason Bourne’s IP address!

[–] Bonsoir@lemmy.ca 16 points 16 hours ago

Please, do not share the button. It's gross.

[–] ttyybb@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Your first mistake is sharing this email with everyone here

[–] webkitten@piefed.social 1 points 11 hours ago

I'm more surprised that it's a normal UA instead of something like AppleWebkit/Gecko/ChromeSafari 547.0

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 4 points 16 hours ago

Probably outer space