We should definitely have closer relationships with the EU. But we should not join outright. We don't need the Euro and we definitely don't need the European Stability and Growth Pact. The Canadian economy should not get too tired up to the European one. We are not the UK, we don't need this, it would be a weight not a booster. And I'm saying this as a dual Canadian-EU citizen.
Canada
What's going on Canada?
Related Communities
🍁 Meta
🗺️ Provinces / Territories
- Alberta
- British Columbia
- Manitoba
- New Brunswick
- Newfoundland and Labrador
- Northwest Territories
- Nova Scotia
- Nunavut
- Ontario
- Prince Edward Island
- Quebec
- Saskatchewan
- Yukon
🏙️ Cities / Local Communities
- Anmore (BC)
- Burnaby (BC)
- Calgary (AB)
- Comox Valley (BC)
- Edmonton (AB)
- East Gwillimbury (ON)
- Greater Sudbury (ON)
- Guelph (ON)
- Halifax (NS)
- Hamilton (ON)
- Kingston (ON)
- Kootenays (BC)
- London (ON)
- Mississauga (ON)
- Montreal (QC)
- Nanaimo (BC)
- Niagara Falls (ON)
- Niagara-on-the-Lake (ON)
- Oceanside (BC)
- Ottawa (ON)
- Port Alberni (BC)
- Regina (SK)
- Sarnia (ON)
- Saskatoon (SK)
- Squamish (BC)
- Thunder Bay (ON)
- Toronto (ON)
- Vancouver (BC)
- Vancouver Island (BC)
- Victoria (BC)
- Waterloo (ON)
- Whistler (BC)
- Windsor (ON)
- Winnipeg (MB)
Sorted alphabetically by city name.
🏒 Sports
Baseball
Basketball
Curling
Hockey
- Main: c/Hockey
- Calgary Flames
- Edmonton Oilers
- Montréal Canadiens
- Ottawa Senators
- Toronto Maple Leafs
- Vancouver Canucks
- Winnipeg Jets
Soccer
- Main: /c/CanadaSoccer
- Toronto FC
💻 Schools / Universities
- BC | UBC (U of British Columbia)
- BC | SFU (Simon Fraser U)
- BC | VIU (Vancouver Island U)
- BC | TWU (Trinity Western U)
- ON | UofT (U of Toronto)
- ON | UWO (U of Western Ontario)
- ON | UWaterloo (U of Waterloo)
- ON | UofG (U of Guelph)
- ON | OTU (Ontario Tech U)
- QC | McGill (McGill U)
Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.
💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales
- Personal Finance Canada
- Buy Canadian
- BAPCSalesCanada
- Canadian Investor
- Canadian Skincare
- Churning Canada
- Quebec Finance
- Canada Grown Business
🗣️ Politics
- General:
- Federal Parties (alphabetical):
- By Province (alphabetical):
🍁 Social / Culture
- Ask a Canadian
- Bières Québec
- Canada Francais
- Canadian Gaming
- EhVideos (Canadian video media)
- First Nations
- First Nations Languages
- Indigenous
- Inuit
- Logiciels libres au Québec
- Maple Music (music)
Rules
- Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
We don't need the Euro and we definitely don't need the European Stability and Growth Pact.
But the GPDR would be nice to be part of.
AFAIK, there is nothing that holds us back from passing a law that says "GDPR applies to Canada".
The hilarious irony is that if we did this, Quebec would have to change all their “Arrêt” signs to “Stop” to comply with EU signage standards
They'll be in full Brexit before that happens. Quexit?
Becxit
Look at how much of a hot button issue immigration has been in Canada already over recent years.
How's the "join the EU" discourse going to go when Canadians realize it would mean any of the 450 million European citizens could move to Canada as they wished?
How about when Canadians realize Brussels would control the distribution of asylum seekers for the whole EU and could decide to just send whatever number of migrants Brussels deemed appropriate from the migrant crisis Europe has been facing and that will no doubt grow as climate change and war drive more migration in Eurasia?
That's just one example, but my guess is that Canadians may like the sound of joining the EU because we like Europe, but the idea would tarnish pretty quickly when looking into all the details.
Huh, my take is the exact inverse. The EU is structurally averse to external immigration in almost all its aspects, whereas we are a constitutionally multicultural settler society with a long term structural reliance on immigration.
The recent course-correction to lower immigration levels is just that, a correction to a larger more long term direction without changing the fundamentals of that direction. We need to be able to have immigration policies that are much more open than what the Europeans can tolerate.
The point is the loss of control.
After joining the EU, it would open free movement to work and live in Canada to 450 million Europeans who can't do that now. How many would want to move to Canada? I don't know, but as many as wanted to come, and Canada would have no point system anymore to decide who gets in. The point system has been the core element of Canada's management of immigration and long-term cultural and workforce composition. Turning over the keys to someone else is a huge ask, especially when there is so much political attention on finding the right mix.
The migrant issue is also about loss of control, but even more politically untenable.
Canada has a very high level of control over refugee and migrant admittance now, and we don't have much of a migrant issue in Canada at all. That's primarily because our only border is shared with the US. Join the EU and we basically share the EU's migrant crisis. Under the new laws, distribution of migrants is up to Brussels, and there's a penalty of something like €20,000 per migrant that you choose not to accept. We can't say for sure how bad the migrant crisis will get in coming years, but it's expected to get substantially worse for Europe. So, we would give up our current highly-controlled situation and end up effectively sharing the challenges of having borders with the MENA region. That is not a politically winning proposition in Canada.
That's what's funny. We both agree that joining the EU is losing control.
You want that control to stay in Canada because you want to keep people out and you think the EU will force us to let them in.
I want that control to stay in Canada because I want to bring people in and I think the EU will force us to keep them out.
We arrive at the same position (Canada must retain control) from precisely inverse paths.
So we agree on what Canada's EU policy should be. And we are in diametric disagreement about what Canada's immigration policy should be.
I was writing why I think it's politically untenable and won't be accepted by Canadians, not about my own views of immigration.
Carney said this is not an option he's pushing for currently. But he wants to grow closer to EU. But WHAT this French FM has suggested does give Carney and Canada leverage as we negotiate with Trump for a new CUSMA.
What Carney says publicly doesn't always seem to reflect what Carney is actually doing behind the scenes. Unfortunately, I understand why Trump's childish reactionary politics make such dishonestly and subterfuge necessary because we are very vulnerable to his tantrums, and enduring his petulant tantrums is counterproductive to the effort of actually getting us to the position where we no longer have to suffer from his tantrums anymore.
I doubt that Carney is actually trying to get us to join the EU right now. He would need a strong public mandate to do something like that, and right now he doesn’t have that
Oui oui oui, allons-y!!
That would be great for both Canada and the EU!
and the EU!
WWT. Let's not get ahead of ourselves. We hope it'd be better for the EU too.
As a European, I am totally convinced it would be much better for the EU too.
Canada using the Euro?
Canada would be fourth largest EU country by GDP.
oh god i hope so, it would put Donald Canada threats to rest (ok maybe not rest but it'd hold no weight anymore) and put us in a way stronger negotiation potion with the USA when donald is finally gone and begins putting itself back together.
This is good because it hints there is more going on behind the scenes, which must make Trump nervous.
At this point, if he freaks and decides to liberate us, I'm reasonably confident our primary schools' elite kamikaze kite flying squadron would be enough to embarrass them.
I would love that.