this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
43 points (95.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

38626 readers
2297 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 1 points 31 minutes ago

More neighborhood vegetable gardens.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 1 points 37 minutes ago

Solar panels. Ass loads of them. Everyone in the area gets a share of the free energy.

You get a larger share if you:

  • host them on your property
  • have more people in your home (families, sharing etc)
  • Are renting because renters need more of a leg up in this world

I live in a fairly small town so millions worth of solar would actually have an impact.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 hour ago

Solar plant, public transit, hydroponic garden, community apiary, schools, libraries

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Off topic, but this the part that gets to me about billionaires. If I had billions I would spend my days helping communities and people directly, the amount of joy and impact on so many lives would be crazy. Every single day you can absolutely change multiple peoples lives in such a positive way.

But instead they fly their private jets to an island to diddle little kids.... what the actually F.

[–] callyral@pawb.social 1 points 52 minutes ago* (last edited 49 minutes ago)
  • Make the city government responsible for sidewalks instead of the property owner. As of now, the sidewalks are all uneven and often sloped, horrible for accessibility. With enough money they'd be convinced to do that. I'm not sure if this is the case because of state or federal laws or if it's a city thing, I live in Brazil.

  • Help people in need of housing and financial stability. People should be able to pay their own bills instead of stealing water and electricity from who-knows-where.

  • Make the local electricity and water infrastructure public. Basic services shouldn't be for-profit. Maybe even end these bills entirely and make these services included in tax, it could work out.

  • Move people out of areas prone to disasters, like landslides. People need good, safe housing.

  • Make nice tiled streets that aren't full of holes. I think tiled streets are better than asphalt, except in highways.

  • Fund a better draining system because streets here get flooded when it rains a lot. Tiled roads would help also, I think.

  • Make the transit of more touristy areas mostly separated from resident areas.

  • Separated bike paths. Bikes should avoid contact with car routes when possible.

  • Free buses for everyone.

  • Help new businesses in areas which didn't have businesses before.

  • Spend a lot, and I mean a lot on funding education and school lunches.

  • Investigate corrupt politicians, at least on the local level since that's the premise of the question.

Any controversial changes, or changes that would take a lot of construction (like fixing the sidewalks and housing) would come with campaigns and be spread out over time for gradual change. Free buses on the other hand could come instantly because I'd have millions or billions of dollars in this scenario.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

Commission individuals at a living wage to do whatever they want, i.e. UBI.

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

If you had asked me this 15 years ago, I'd probably describe a housing complex with low rent and with on-site grocery store, post office, liquor store, and other amenities.

shit's gotten quite fucked since then.

Today, my answer is guns and ammunition.

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Today, my answer is guns and ammunition.

Are you... are you suggesting we kill all the poor? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_4J4uor3JE

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I'm suggesting arm the poor and kill the rich.

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 3 points 2 hours ago

Hear, hear.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 4 hours ago

Neighbourhood battery banks.

[–] StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

That's not alot of money anymore.

Around me, the biggest issues are homelessness and drug use. Millions won't solve either but could put a bigger dent, long term, in the housing issue.

I think I'd build a bunch of low cost houses, in the sub $100k range if possible. They wouldn't be mansions by any stretch but it might put a dent in the housing market.

[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 7 points 8 hours ago

Let's start somewhere else. I live in a pretty wealthy town. Playgrounds and greenery literally everywhere.

I would build housing first units in every major town center. End homelessness effectively and humanely.

[–] mech@feddit.org 14 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Millions are not a lot.

I'd buy inner city housing complexes and transfer them to cooperative ownership, with all rent money going towards upkeep and a collectively-owned fund that will be used to bring more housing into the cooperative over time.

Only the inhabitants collectively can decide what to use the fund for, but the by-laws of the cooperative will not allow selling of real estate or drawing from the fund individually.

In the long run, that'll remove more and more living space from the predatory profit-oriented market and take financial pressure out of the lives of many people.

[–] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 27 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
  1. Homeless shelters, housing, and work programs.

  2. Education, and especially special education and mental health support in schools.

  3. Small business low interest loans and art grants.

[–] Interstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 11 hours ago

These are great plans, and I would definitely do the same. I would also try to fund STEM activities for the youth and community, as most of that sort of money and effort here just goes into sports.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

More trees, less concrete.

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

With the climate change starting to fry up places, trees offer a great way to cool cities. Should be a top priority of any city to plant more trees.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

They also reduce noise pollution, make people less depressed, and help abate flooding. Trees are lit.

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 2 points 3 hours ago

And you can hug them, you can talk to them. I seriously recommend at least the talking part. Walk to the woods, find a nice tree and just start chatting. I do it all the time.

No, I'm not mad... I mean I am, but that's not related to me talking to trees.

Trees are the reason I use ecosia.org search, even though they use the devils, bing and google for their searches. But if I have to deal with the devil, at least I can have some tree planting included in the deal.

[–] MohamedMoney@feddit.org 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

🎶 I'd rather be a forest than a street 🎶

[–] Lysergid@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 hours ago

Trams, Metro and bicycle lanes. Like everywhere. Also central heating.

[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 13 points 11 hours ago

Depends how many millions. The biggest problems the Netherlands has are caused by too intensive agriculture. Buying out farmland and converting it to nature areas to prevent eutrophication would greatly increase our surface water quality and reduce ammonia emissions to improve air quality while also reducing some of the pressure on existing nature areas which would allow more housing projects to take place. This would require many millions though.

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago

Protected bike lanes, protected bike lanes everywhere.

[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You don't need millions to spend to make positive change. Joining or starting a mutual aid group and plugging in to a larger network can do wonders for positive change. Read up about the Free Breakfast for Children program back in the 70s it was so successful the government tried to shut it down but also had to replace it with their own program.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I don't understand mutual aid.

I haven't had any experience with it other than what I've seen here.

It just seems like a very inefficient way to allocate scarce resources.

[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

Mutual aid is not about just financial or about resources. Its just setting up a community network to help. That could be giving a loan to someone to fix their car or could be your elderly neighbor needs a ride to the doctor or giving them some of your leftover pot roast. In turn that same neighbor maybe mends your pants or watches your kids. Like during the civil rights movement it could be as small as making food for a marginalized group. Its just an extension of the support system you normally get from family but for families to get support. When the government fails to help or worse actively harm.

[–] Libb@piefed.social 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Let's say billions. Let's say I'm one of those tech billionaire and that I suddenly grow a conscience (very unlikely but, heck, I also don't have billions, not even millions not even enough to retire... so let's pretend).

What would I do with my fortune and that newly found conscience that's irking me?

  • Supporting the FSF with one specific demand: for them to finish their fully Libre OS and ensure the GNU/GPL is set in stone.
  • Supporting the EFF, helping them fight that dystopian society my fellow rich people (and their politicians valets) are building against the population. Edit: it's happening in real time everywhere around the world.
  • And with the bulk of my money? I would be opening as many private schools as I can and making them tuition-free for pupils (say after an interview, to see if the kid is really motivated) and also making sure we hire the best teachers we can.

Why private and why tuition-free? Public educative systems have dramatically failed in most Western countries, they don’t educate kids anymore. It's a real-time nightmare that has been going on for a few decades, with dramatic consequences too few people seem to worry about. Meanwhile, private schools have not failed that bad... but they’re also expensive and therefore reserved to rich-family kids. What an amusing coincidence: quality teaching reserved to wealthy kids. So, by making tuition-free private schools I hope to give ‘normal’ kids access to the same chances rich kids have access to. And by making them private, I'm making sure to stay out of the sabotaging power of the public educative system. I would start in my own country (France, that used to be role model in education and is now a very sad joke) but I would do my best to spread the concept as widely as possible.

Edit: clarifications.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

Education. Progress follows education. Hell even if you progress a lot, it starts reverting over generations without education.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 11 points 11 hours ago

Buy white vans, install wifi hotspots, and drive around with "FREE WIFI" written on the van in a sharpie.

But its actually a free wifi with no catches.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I'm gonna assume you mean a generous 999,999,999 in which case I would install a central tram system (free to use), remove or thin a significant amount of roads, and build a few affordable housing complexes along the tram line. All with the assistance of those who know more about building effective infrastructure than I do. With anything left over I would fund a food pantry and community garden system.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 3 points 9 hours ago

Give it to someone who knows more than i do.
More bike infrastructure would be good though.

[–] org@lemmy.org 7 points 11 hours ago

I’d kill billionaires

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I'd spend it all on tech and financial education. Too many people have no fucking clue about either and get scammed often.

Whoever is already at least semi-literate in these 2 fields would be asked to teach others, paid comparably to their current job is possible.

Oportunity for debate will be open and exposed online to be judged by whoever can find the post, to determine what information is right, or at least commonly accepted.

That should already amount to millions if not pass it.

[–] Melobol@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago

Free childcare and early childhood development with free meals for kids. Ohh and playgrounds and parks.
It has proven in the past to improve a lot of things in a community.

[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip -4 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Brainstorming?

Get all the homeless passports and a home with a garden in a third world country.

Build a community there so they can help each other and become self-sustaining.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Liberia all over again? "Let's get rid of these undesirables and send them off overseas"

[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 hours ago

Brother, anywhere is better than this fascist hellscape. At least if no one from the government knows you exist they won’t come abduct you or kill you or tax you for living.

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Just because a person is homeless, doesn't mean they don't have connections to the place they grew up in, you know stuff like family and friends. Just because a person is homeless doesn't mean they are willing to move to a different country, let alone continent.

You thinking homeless people are things that you can just pick up and ship into a different place, is quite concerning.

[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip -1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

My reluctance to have them stay in the United States is based on the fact that the government can and will fuck with them for existing.

You immediately assuming my suggestion is dehumanizing is concerning but what else is there to expect when negativity is what runs the internet?

Go ahead and skip to the personal attacks so I can block you already.

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

In my opinion it would be better to focus your efforts to getting a better government, than to spend millions and millions moving possibly unwilling people to a foreign land and have them take over space that is probably owned by the natives who might have a thing or two to say about this weird new colonization plan you've cooked up. And then hope that they start a self sustaining commune there.

I dunno, just seems like a weird route to take. But seeing how bonkers your government and political system is, I can understand why you would think such a odd plan would have some merit.

I mean, I don't have any problems with not trusting the US government, that's just a sign of being healthy. My concerns were just for the people you would want to fly to a different place and for the people living in that different place.

[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

How many millions do you think it takes to change the government until you run out and how does this scenario address the question we’re supposed to be answering?

EDIT: I like how you shifted the goalposts and suddenly they all have families that love them and that makes them anll unwilling to move to a better location.

In that vein, I’d like to also present some shifted goalposts: They love love love the idea of free housing in a tropical place with no government to harass or kill them and they can live in peace until they choose to move back. Right now they’re drinking fresh coconuts and talking about how all the people that love them are living with them.

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Sorry, what question I was supposed to be answering?

Edit: whoops, misread what you wrote lol. Sorry. You can ignore me now :D

[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 1 points 3 hours ago

Yeah I edited my comment but too late. I misread what you wrote lol, sorry about that

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago

Raising taxes on the wealthy.

[–] Pudutr0n@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago