this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
1405 points (99.4% liked)

Science Memes

20186 readers
2055 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 62 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Also: Replace "super" (as in "superfood") with "sacred" and it works just as well.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 54 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Oh how I hate the whole idea of detox and clean as it relates to nutrition. I worked at a health food store when I was young and while there was good nutritious food there, plenty of good people, the whole idea of 'clean' comes from a very dark place. I remember the raw foods guys and the idea of breathetarians. Like the less physical and embodied you were, the better person you were, enlightened. The idea of the physical world being unclean and something you should try to be free of, I hate it.

It really is more of a religious idea than anything to do with physical health. I think you have to enjoy being embodied, love the physical plane of existence, to have a healthy body. Not perfect.

ETA: OMG another comment reminded me. Also the colonics people trying to get literally clean inside, horrified at the stuff that came out of them, convinced it was toxic. I'm sure they are all dead by now.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I worked at a vitamin store chain owned by the parents of a college friend of mine (who is now worth $34 million lol - that chain has turned into a miniature Whole Foods) for a few months. I remember one customer came in because she was going through a divorce, and the cashier said "oh, you need St. John's Wort for that". Nobody there thought this was unusual in any way.

Also knew a guy in college who claimed to be a Breathitarian. We caught him at the Ponderosa steak house in the next town over one night.

[–] bobo@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 month ago

I remember one customer came in because she was going through a divorce, and the cashier said "oh, you need St. John's Wort for that".

Capitalist witch woman gives antidepressants

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 month ago

I read a thing recently that argued that "purity" is one of the most distinctive thematic motifs in fascistic thinking, and examined how that is a means by which people can slide into right wing ideologies from an initially left wing position.

It was striking because it made it clock for me why there seems to be a "crunchy eco-leftist turns right wing" pipeline. To attempt to summarise some of the article and my own thoughts following it: A purity oriented framework of health situates "toxins" and the like as the Big Bad Other. Many of us are aware of how dangerous the notion of a Big Bad Other is if we're thinking about people, but it can creep up with us in contexts like this because it doesn't seem harmful initially. However, by thinking about health in this way, we train ourselves to think in terms of the Big Bad Other, and condition ourselves towards thinking about things in a black and white manner.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 54 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Pseudo-dermatology is also not very far away. The gap between what dermatologists and influencers say would be hilarious if gullible teenagers weren't spending ridiculous amounts of money ruining their own skin.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The one that had me cry-laughing was the "sun your genitals" fad that lasted what, a week?

I lost a ton of weight and that gave me the courage to go to the nude beach. That day I got exactly 30 seconds of sun on my cock and that was enough to sunburn my knob. Itch/burn for days. There's a reason it's known as *where the sun don't shine". Can't imagine what it was like for the dopes that gave themselves 15 minutes under the Cali sun.

[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A lot of people go to nude beaches often and don't have that problem. Did you use sunscreen?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 52 points 1 month ago (6 children)

The funny thing, the truly funny thing, Is that many people reading this will assume their assumptions about nutrition are fact based and everybody else's is pseudoscience. Examining the data on your own biases is critical for any standing in science.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz 50 points 1 month ago (3 children)

my boss does a "cleanse" once a month. IDK what she takes but she also believes ivermectin cures cancer, sooooo....
Its no coincidence that she is one of the sickest "healthy" people ive met. She has no health conditions or chronic illnesses. Shes in good physical shape and doesn't smoke or drink. Exercises most days, etc. Yet, she "cant get out of bed" or has some mystery stomach flu or something like that about once a month. Funny how that seems to line up just after her cleanses. I suggested once that she was making it worse with the cleanses but she just doubled down.
Willfully ignorant and proud.

[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Firehouse in the USA: "right leaning straight white guys that watch FOX news" is over represented. We work 24 hour shifts and thus cook two meals a day at the station. Inevitably that means I get to experience whatever dumb-ass dietary advice the manosphere/RFK Jr. is pushing: keto, carnivore, MORE PROTEIN, etc.

They get hilariously defensive when I tell them "I don't do fad diets".

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago (15 children)

The number of people that don't believe that taking in fewer calories than you put out will cause you to lose weight still astounds me. Your body isn't some magic device that doesn't have to obey the laws of physics.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 33 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Some people mistake healthier with less calories.

I switched from a box of Little Debbie’s a day to a bag of trail mix! Why can’t I lose weight?

That olive oil you’re using is good for you, sure, but it’s not a freebee. It has calories. Things like this are often not even noticed or counted.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 25 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Whilst this is true; your body does have some pretty neat tricks to maintain homeostasis; it can shift the energy budget around quite a bit to where it is needed.

Your body will down regulate some systems to try to keep your total energy balance within what is "normal" for each person.

Digestion uses quite a bit of energy; this is why sometimes you feel sleepy after eating; your brain has been down regulated to enable digestion.

Another common example is when runners get into "the zone"; this is your brain prioritising the required processes and reducing the energy of other parts, putting you into a semi trance....this is so your body can maintain an energy balance.

It is also why we sometimes feel sick if exercising hard and then eat quickly afterward; your gut is not ready for that job.

High energy process that can be "switched off" or at least significantly reduced:

  • Brain processes (up to 25% of your energy budget)
  • Immune system (~20% when fighting infection)
  • Digestion (dependent on food 3[sugar] - 30[protein]% of food energy)

Just because you have done some exercise; doesn't mean you have used more total energy that day....it seems counter intuitive; but your body likely shifted energy from one thing (immune system, brain) to muscles, for the time your were exercising.

In saying that exercising is so good for other things; physical and mental health are enhanced by exercise, there are so many good things about exercise, just don't rely on it for weight loss.

As the old saying goes "you can't out run a bad diet"; you are correct, if over the long term you eat fewer calories than your body requires, you will see an effect. But your body is a tricksy beast, it will do all it can to prevent this; it is why dieting is so hard in an age of abundant food.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (19 children)

I'll just keep repeating this, but your BMR (Basal Metabolic Rate) is not scientifically set in stone.

While it's accurate for I would say 90% of the population, rough estimate, there are many things that can cause your BMR to not be accurate, like thyroid issues or lack of musculature due to sedentary lifestyle or due to hormone imbalances or any number of myriad things.

I went and had mine tested and it cost me I believe $70 at a sports medicine place, and I burn approximately 200 calories less than my BMR chart says that I should.

So if I wanted to maintain my weight, and I ate the calories the internet says that I should every day, I would actually gain almost 20 lbs a year (a nice rough estimate is every 10 calories a day you cut from your diet you lose one pound a year).

And as I am working on losing weight, and I'm eating 500 calories under my BMR, I'm actually only eating 300 calories under my true BMR, which means my weight loss is incredibly slow.

So yes, while calories and calories out is true, there are external factors that make it difficult to get accurate numbers to compare against.

Therefore calories in calories out is much simpler to say than it is to do for some percentage of the population.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] U7826391786239@piefed.zip 34 points 1 month ago (3 children)

i lost ~50 lb last year just by intermittent fasting and walking more. actually i stopped eating processed junk too

[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (21 children)

Almost like the only "scientific knowledge" you need is to burn more and take in less.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 45 points 1 month ago (5 children)

"Just stop being depressed and enjoy life".

People are overweight because something in their diet, psychology or physiology overrides the natural desire to stop eating when they've had enough calories. As long as that thing isn't addressed, trying to use willpower to overcome it can easily lead to burnout and disappointment. Sometimes raw willpower works, but most people who are overweight have tried that and found it doesn't work for them.

Those people aren't failures, they just happened to have a problem that didn't eliminate itself when using willpower. If your problem is the chemicals in fast food, then stopping fast food by willpower can solve things, but if your problem is pica for some vitamin deficiency than stopping fast food by willpower will not solve things. People that stop by willpower alone are lucky, nothing more.

So most people who are overweight do in fact need more scientific knowledge, or better environments, or both. A pedestrian-murdering hellscape isn't great for getting enough exercise. Micronutrients, letting your stomach rest, avoiding blood sugar spikes and dips, metabolism-affecting drugs like caffeine, stress eating, etc can all affect things.

And because people can't just get up and move to a pedestrian-friendly area, or because vegetables are twice as expensive as meat per calorie, or because their job requires them to sit still for eight hours, they want to try the messy imperfect solutions that do as much as possible in their limited environment.

I can well believe that intermittent fasting works better than "burn more eat less" for someone with the unnatural lifestyle of sitting in an office chair for hours straight. The traditional 3 meal structure was built on a society where people did lots of physical labor throughout the day every day, so just trying to eat less in those 3 meals doesn't change the fact that your body needs far fewer calories at certain times than that diet frees up, and the same goes for exercising outside of work hours.

[–] oxideseven@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just addressing one part of this.

Veggies aren't a primary source of calories, when trying to reduce calorie intake and eating healthy. Veggies are there for other important reasons. You focus on beans, lentils, and other legums for calories. Meat doesn't even come close to their value. Rice, while having it's own problems, is also more calories per dollar by far.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 1 month ago

When I read "nutritional hexes" I assumed this would be honeycomb related.

[–] 01011@monero.town 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Shout out to "alkaline water".

[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 month ago

I loved it when Gwyneth Paltrow said she drinks alkaline water for the health benefits... with a slice of lemon.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 month ago

With a squeeze of lemon!

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Nah bro I’m a Paleolithic human so I eat my burger without a bun.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (3 children)

100%. For example right now the meat and dairy lobby groups are pushing hard for everyone to eat for more protein than they need. Now, I have people who can't tell the difference between a cytokine and a histone without using Google, even if it slapped them round the face, telling me they need 100g plus a day in Brotien. Its just a coincidence that this so called health advice makes those groups a lot more money.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

All over the place, we're dealing with people who Do Not Get science, because they don't really inhabit an objective reality. They're doing the same woo-woo nonsense humanity has always done. It's all just stories and belief. The signifiers just changed from headdresses to lab coats, and the jargon has a bit more Latin.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Bro you ever try to make money selling horse radish extract? You gotta find creative ways to convince people to buy your product. 100% a marketing scheme.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (10 children)

I know people who refuse to eat gluten even though no doctor told them to avoid it.

edit for clarity

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I don't eat gluten because it provokes my auto immune disorder and makes my psoriasis bloom.

25 years of doctors telling me that diet cannot influence the condition(s) while prescribing progressively more intense medications. They would sarcastically smirk when I asked... Ohohoho silly patient why would you ask such a dumb question. Not just GPs but Dermatologists too.

I found out by accident when I taught myself to cook and accidentally cut out wheat and barley.

Lots of people are intolerant but don't realize. Many people realize and cut it out of their lives, then have to deal with the sarcasm/cynicism/ignorance of others.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›