this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
378 points (98.7% liked)

politics

29761 readers
2566 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“US President Donald Trump on Wednesday delivered an incoherent primetime address in which he threatened to bomb Iran “back to the Stone Ages” while also claiming negotiations to end the conflict were ongoing, remarks that provided no clear indication of when or how the illegal war of choice would end.

“Trump’s speech marked his first major address on the war since the US, in partnership with Israel, started bombing Iran more than a month ago, without congressional approval and in violation of international law. A day after declaring that Iran “doesn’t have to make a deal” to end the war, Trump said during his Wednesday speech, “If there is no deal, we are going to hit each and every one of their electric generating plants very hard and probably simultaneously”—a grave war crime.

“Collin Rees, US campaign manager at the advocacy group Oil Change International, said in a statement that “Trump’s rambling lies can’t conceal how his reckless, illegal war of aggression is sending energy prices for working families through the roof.””

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ActualGrapesTasteGreen@piefed.zip 63 points 1 month ago (37 children)

But Kamala Harris laughs weird...

/s

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 48 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The reight was so concerned with their Buttery males and their "let's go brandons" that we have an evil dictator willing to glass entire regions to keep everyone from talking about all the underage girls he raped.

If there IS a worse timeline I don't want to see it.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No, they want this. They want to see brown people nuked into oblivion while they fantasize about raping children.

[–] Angrydeuce@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

These fools think theyre actually going to heaven when they die lol

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That could also be. I hate it but you're right, that's a real possibility.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I had a Republican roommate 25 years ago. It was eye-opening.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Mine thought bill oreilly was a flaming liberal, in his words. He came from the nazi part of Idaho

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Wait, which part isn't?

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Yes, we all know how democrats would never start a war in the Middle East.

🙄

load more comments (35 replies)
[–] panthera_@lemmy.today 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This might cause Iranians to support their government despite disliking it and Iranians in the US who supported Trump's attack on Iran might now have second thoughts.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 1 month ago

I hated the Bush administration with everything I had, and still do, but 9/11 didn't convince me to overthrow my government.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

“Our bastard is better than someone else’s bastard.”

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 10 points 1 month ago

Its still so gets me how much this is like what was portrayed to us in the 80's of what the us would be like if a communists or facists took over. Even before because 1984 and such. The way he extoled the good economy and how we achieved everything wanted and if he mentioned anything negative even tangentially it was to say it was so minor and short lived. I hate this scary as trump time.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why are they letting him? He isn't going to be personally dropping the bombs himself. Everyone could just collectively stop following his orders.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Cool, so now he is floating the idea of nuking them?

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If trump’s ego gets cornered deeply enough I have a feeling he’d use nukes.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I have no doubt he would try. This is the guy who thought nuking a hurricane would be a good idea.

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 1 month ago

time for us all to prepare for Operation Lethal Easter Bunny this high holy day weekend

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

they could end up worse than some red states

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

He didn’t have anything to say he just needed to get in front of the cameras because the astronauts were getting attention.

[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

And we've still got the better part of three years of his insanity left to go. Preppers may finally get to use their supplies.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

That MAGA idiots are fusing the Iranian population to continue fighting. What fucking negotiation? The planned meeting in Islamabad ended with a big fucking zero.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

seriously what the fuck is up with articles nowadays just not having the fucking quote context and source

load more comments
view more: next ›