this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2026
267 points (98.5% liked)

You Should Know

45467 readers
677 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Rule 11- Posts must actually be true: Disiniformation, trolling, and being misleading will not be tolerated. Repeated or egregious attempts will earn you a ban. This also applies to filing reports: If you continually file false reports YOU WILL BE BANNED! We can see who reports what, and shenanigans will not be tolerated. We are not here to ban people who said something you don't like.

If you file a report, include what specific rule is being violated and how.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden. None of these nations have an minimim hourly wage enshrined in law. Instead many of the base terms of employment, including wages, are decided via collective bargaining between sector trade unions and representatives of public sector and business interest organizations.

Minimum wage decided by politics is something taken for granted in many parts of the world, but ultimately it's a question that most of all affects the suppliers (employees) and buyers (employers). The government will always be behind the times in legislation and have many other interests to juggle than yours - don't just be a passive participant in the market.

I live in Sweden by the way, so feel free to ask me questions on the topic and I'll do my best to answer.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] one5low7@lemmy.org 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

it's pretty much the least a company is allowed to pay for child labor

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago

Indeed but their philosophy is more inline with American economists James Galbrath's view that a functional "capitalist" society at least needs a triumvirate to work. That is, equal parts unions, business and government.

Many parts of the english speaking developed world don't have that and rely on a mostly two part system of government and business, with government ostensibly representing workers but alas government has been captured by business.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nordic system is much better for wages...

in USA our unions have been smashed down to 10%, and ironically the majority of those are government employees and police

in USA we have twenty states that still pay minimum wage (or less). They dodge minimum wage law multiple ways, all bullshit, all wage theft

Poland has better benefits for workers than USA. We have been surpassed by Eastern Europe, thanks labor party!*

*that's a joke, we have no labor party

[–] Ice@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

ironically the majority of those are government employees and police

It's not ironic in the slightest. It's for government employees that the conflict of interest between what's best for the government (often low costs of labour) and employees (generous benefits and wages) becomes impossible to ignore.

Similar incentive structures do exist on a national economic level. For instance lower wages often provide a more competitive industrial basis internationally, even if that is not neccessarily beneficial for the individual employee.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

It's definitely ironic.

A government that wrecks unions uses unions to pay itself.

You can't get more ironic

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

Works the same way in Switzerland. Some places may have a minimum wage locally, but it's rare and on a national level there's nothing. However the unions aren't strong in all sectors so some jobs really do pay shit.

[–] Muffi@programming.dev 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And that is exactly why gig workers are still getting screwed in Scandinavia. Talk to a Wolt delivery person, and you will quickly support a federal minimum wage.

[–] Ice@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago

Strictly speaking, gig workers aren't employed, but rather a contractor who is self-employed. This means that a lot of labour legislation doesn't really apply (which would include minimum wages).

It is in the pipeline of legislation however, and I know that some unions have started targeting gig employers with collective bargaining. Foodora for instance is covered by collective agreement since 2021.

[–] myplacedk@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

As I understand it, they are not employees, minimum wage does not apply. They are each independent, legally running their own company. A company can sell their services as cheap as they want.

I don't understand how that works, because it's illegal to run a company and then work as if you're an employee. Specially not when the purpose is obviously to get around the law for employees.

[–] dhcmrlchtdj__@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

I work at a museum in the US dedicated to Nordic history and heritage. We were all at-will employed until we unionized recently. It is still shocking to me the amount of cognitive dissonance people are capable of as they long for the prosperity of the Nordic countries, but then openly bash unions and workers. The work culture is so bad here, it’s like everyone is under a persistent fog.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 93 points 2 days ago (1 children)

From what I've heard, Norwegian unions are actively against a national minimum wage, because they believe that would act as a low anchor harming their negotiations.

Although there is no national minimum wage in Norway, certain industries or specific groups do have a specific minimum wage. For example, there is a legally mandated minimum wage for minors, to avoid them being exploited in summer jobs.

In other cases, unions have negotiated fixed levels for their focus areas (e.g. engineers working government jobs), and everyone working those jobs, whether they're members of the union or not, will get paid those levels. Sometimes everyone in the group gets a raise simultaneously as a result of annual union negotiations.

[–] veroxii@aussie.zone 31 points 2 days ago

Yeah, what workers see as a floor, companies see as a ceiling.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ive always said I would rather have a maximum income than a minimum one. minimum will solve itself when you make sure one person can't like buy every single bushel of wheat that the world produces in a year.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

Wealth caps

Nobody should have a networth of over 10 million

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 66 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'd like to provide some further context. This wasn't always the case here in Sweden, obviously.

A big shift in our society happened because of the massacre in Ådalen.

This was in the 1930s, during the great depression. People didn't have jobs, particularly in Ådalen where the unemployment rate was around 85-90%. People were starving. So they worked together, they demonstrated, and the worker parties gained significant support.

The powers that be didn't like this, naturally. They tried to put a lid on the events, and called in the military. To cut a long story short, the military opened fire and several bystanders were killed. It led to nation-wide demonstrations, and the Social Democrats gained significant following, leading to them being the majority government for decades afterwards. We saw social and worker reforms, and is largely the reason Sweden is held in such high regard internationally.

Things don't really last however. Private interests are trying to dismantle the system we have here, because it gives workers too much bargaining power. IF Metall has been striking against Tesla for coming up on three years at this point. Tesla has their supporters, because obviously they do. People don't get that the reason for the strike isn't because Tesla's workers necessarily have it bad, but because Tesla is trying to undermine the system we have here, and set a precedent for others to do the same.

In e.g. the U.S., employers have significant power over workers. Some states have at-will employment, where either an employer or a worker can just walk out on the contract whenever. This is only ever to the worker's benefit when the market is looking for workers; I can't recall a time in my lifetime where this has been the case. They dangle people's livelihoods and through things like healthcare, their very lives, to enslave workers.

We are headed down the same path, with well over a decade of right-wing rhetoric, privatisation, and budgets eroding our systems.

It's election year this year, and I really wish people would remember where we were a hundred years ago.

[–] Ice@lemmy.zip 2 points 12 hours ago

Within Swedish politics there is essentially complete agreement that the union model of labour negotiation should remain. Companies like Tesla are certainly an issue, but comparatively easier to deal with. The larger threat to the union model actually comes from undeclared labour which is a huge, systemic problem.

It ends up being significantly cheaper for the employer (no taxes, benefits, regulation) and can (in the short term) be beneficial for the employee (higher wage, still cashing in unemployment benefits etc.) even if it is disruptive for the collective long term.

In some businesses such as salons for hair dressers or mani-pedi, as many as 40% of labour is undeclared. Restaurants, construction and transportation are also high up.

[–] Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

its tough to fully grasp, i am maybe only now getting it. but we must live in a constant state of revolution.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 13 points 2 days ago

Yeah. It's the one thing I find the most exhausting about how democracy works. It requires an ongoing participation, and our society is sadly structured in a manner where that isn't easily done for everyone, and as such not everyone gets proper representation.

It's further hampered by the fact that individuals and other institutions with financial means can employ people to do political work for them. This just isn't feasible for individuals, many of us don't have much money to spare, and we're fully occupied between our professional, and our personal lives.

So once participation in democracy starts slipping, when workers are unable to attend, our rights start getting eroded.

This isn't exactly helped by media, social and otherwise. We live in an attention economy where explosive headlines and bold attention-grabbing statements win out. We don't get accurate representations of reality, and thus the decisions we make are based on whatever lies we've adopted to become our worldview.

The only real solution I see to this is to empower people to have the ability to partake in unions and cultivate a political interest. Otherwise we'll just be ruled by the oligarchs and we'll return to a more or less feudal state of things.

I'm trying really hard to engage politically in my area, but honestly the only party that seems to put themselves out there is the nazi party, so I'm hardly surprised that they've been garnering a lot of followers for the past decade.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Any talk of abolishing the wage system?

It's amazing how far right we've come since the late 1800s

[–] Ice@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Oh for sure, there are lots of companies pushing the gig-economy self employment model.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 4 hours ago

If profits aren't shared equally among employees, that's not abolition of the wage system

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Minimum wage means the company wants to pay you even less but it's illegal" lol

But seriously even tho the min wage hasn't increased since 2009 in the U.S. I think most fast food places start at $9 or $10 / hr. Still a slap in the face, but they at least realized the min wage was way too low and nobody would work at that pay.

[–] Ice@lemmy.zip 2 points 13 hours ago

The main problem I see with legislated minimum wages is that it becomes a legitimate target for employers in a "take it or leave it" fashion.

[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Wouldn't the problem of the government not keeping up be solved by just indexing minimum wage to inflation?

[–] Ice@lemmy.zip 2 points 13 hours ago

Partly, but there is more to collective bargaining than that.

a) Indexed inflation levels tend to be underreported (exactly due to things like this)

b) it does not allow for over-time adjustment of real wage levels. As productivity increases, the real wage usually goes up. During periods of economic crisis you often see the largest wage increases in absolute terms, but a decrease in the real wage due to inflation. These negotiations are the toughest.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That was the intent, says so in 1938 Labor Law (it was to rise, the minimum being enough to feed a family of four and keep them above the poverty line).

bOtH pArTiEs abandoned this long ago. But stock market is at 50K!!!#

[–] a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but generally by collective bargaining produces a higher wage for the employee

[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Stern@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In Oregon we changed our minimum wage to go up some each year for a few years then be indexed to inflation via the consumer price index. Feel like that plus an extra bit of indexing to population helps a lot.

https://www.oregon.gov/boli/workers/pages/minimum-wage.aspx

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

cali does raise thier MW often, but its also HCOL so im not surprising oregons doing this.

[–] thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It used to work like that in Italy, although not with a national minimum wage but with union-negotiated contracts. At least some of them had a clause that automatically raised base salaries according to inflation.

I read somewhere that clause was removed because it'd cause a vicious loop where raising inflation meant higher wages, which in turn drove up inflation.

At face value it makes sense, but I'm no expert so I can't say whether that's correct or some bs to keep wages low.

[–] CarnivorousCouch@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

My understanding of the research is that a higher minimum wage can increase costs, but as a lesser proportion than the increase (edit; to the wage). Labor costs are only portion of expenses for any business, and workers making minimum wage only reflect a portion of the workforce. So, there's not a zero effect, but I believe it's usually less than fear mongering would suggest.

I haven't read into this in at least five years, so happy to admit my own incorrectness if someone knows better.

[–] medem@lemmy.wtf 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My first time in Norway (2010) I noticed right away that the prices were pretty obscene, so the first thing I did when I arrived at the hostel was to ask the guy behind the counter what the minimum wage was. He didn't even know the concept of minimum wage.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

That is just one guy behind a counter. Of course we know what the concept of minimum wage is in the Nordics, it is very much part of the Nordic model.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 6 points 2 days ago

The point is that there are people that don't. And that tells something very interesting about labor relations.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago

So that’s why they all have to work 3 jobs at least to pay rent. Oh wait, that’s only in ‘Murica the case

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I used to teach English in Japan. There was apparently a time long ago when native English teachers were treated very badly in Japan. The companies would pay them a pittance and there are stories that some companies confiscated teacher passports. Very bad stuff.

So one remedy that the Japanese government pursued was to establish a minimum wage for teachers. But it didn't increase for I think decades, and the amount was, once again, difficult to live on. I don't know whether Japan has increased this minimum wage since then.

Minimum wages need to be based on some other value so that they adjust naturally and we don't have to wait on lawmakers to manually adjust them, even if they could pass manual updates.

One other idea is to have a wealth ceiling. And then base minimum wage off of that. For example, say that the maximum is X and the minimum wage would be X divided by a billion. If Elon musk wants to have 20 billion, then minimum wage would be $20/hour. That's just a quick example and not meant to be indicative of the actual numbers.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

I used to teach English in Japan. There was apparently a time long ago when native English teachers were treated very badly in Japan. The companies would pay them a pittance

I dunno when you left but I'm pretty sure wages for English teachers suck these days. Probably not so much black company activity (confiscating passports etc) but in the last 15ish years there have been enough weebs flooding into the country such that companies can pay peanuts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 6 points 2 days ago

talk about worrying a out minutia instead of actual outcomes

gonna assume this is engagement bait

[–] mech@feddit.org 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

Is it true that all wages are public, though?
Cause that might have something to do with the strong bargaining power of employees.

[–] myplacedk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not in Denmark. Although there's a law on the way, so every employee will know their range.

I think that means that from the title, you will know that everyone in the company with that title, will have between X and Y salary.

This should help negotiating salary in a more fair way.

[–] mech@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

In Germany, there are specialized companies who receive that salary info from businesses in exchange for giving them the salary info from other businesses. And also sell that info.
But private citizens don't get access to it.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

At least for Norway, this is not technically true, but it also doesn't matter.

Unions will run surveys across their members every year, and as long as they have enough members to have bargaining power, they also have the data. So they don't really need all wages to be public in order to negotiate.

What is public in Norway, is the total taxable income of individuals. This is meant as a measure against tax fraud, and also an annual source of entertainment as you look up local and national rankings of who paid the most taxes, check that you're still making more than your middle school bully, and so forth. But total taxable income can contain more than wages, so that is not really the number you're referring to, and as mentioned the union has better data anyway.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, only in Sweden. And if you look up someone, they will be notified of who did it.

[–] colourlessidea@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Norway as well

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 9 points 2 days ago

Yes, this is public information. You can go to the Swedish tax agency and ask for an excerpt. There are also information brokers who make it their business to collate private information that's available publicly and publish it for a fee.

These companies have been a bit of a thorn in our side because that's not exactly how the system was intended, and it's made it a lot easier for e.g. stalkers to find information on you. Information like where you live, your income, your social ID number, birthdate, size of your home, if in a flat, which door is yours, sometimes even with direct instructions from the entrance. It's bananas.

Personally I think these laws need to be looked over. I don't think having salaries available publicly is harmful, but I've personally had problems with a person being able to dig up my info and harassing me. All this was different in an age where you had to report to the tax agency and request an excerpt, contra now where you can just pay a small sum to an information broker and get all of it without the system knowing who requested it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›