this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2026
662 points (99.1% liked)

Science Memes

20009 readers
3622 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
662
Good Design (mander.xyz)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
 
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 96 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 44 points 1 week ago

Perfect example, Skynet is an excellent engineer. Be like Skynet.

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 73 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I turn 60 in June. I'm doing this with my body.

[–] treesapx@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago

One of my favorites

[–] cobysev@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I turn 42 next month, but my body is beat up from 2 decades of military service. I'm definitely experiencing some "catastrophic functionality" myself.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Can they amputate backs yet?

[–] IGuessThisIsMyName@lemmy.world 60 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I've always used escalators as a great example of this. If they lose power or break they elegantly degrade back into stairs.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

"Sorry for the convenience" -- Mitch Hedberg

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

escalators are actually a bad example of this. What you describe is what is supposed to happen, and they're supposed to be built with mechanisms to ensure that's what happens, but there's been examples of escalators failing in such a way that the weight of too many people on it makes it go faster and faster and people get crushed and deadified.

I watched a youtube video about a famous example a while back, don't remember the channel that did it though or I'd find and link it.

edit: I've been proven wrong but I'm leaving my comment because it's a learning experience for anyone who reads this thread.

[–] caradenada@feddit.cl 12 points 1 week ago

Escalators have many security features and they are one of the safest modes of transportation.

[–] Railing5132@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Out of the tens of thousands of installed systems, there are bound to be failures of the mechanical safeties (or human-performed installation/maintenence) that can lead to a Swiss cheese path to failure. I wouldn't necessarily dismiss the whole category as a bad example because of that however.

Is it perfectly fail-safe? Well, in those cases, it wasn't. But what were the contributing factors?

[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I think that specific example was shown to be sabotaged at the behest of management to try to save on maintenance costs so no that doesn’t count

[–] skiguy0123@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] JackFrostNCola@aussie.zone 6 points 1 week ago

Well in that case it WAS built with multiple safety mechanisms and failsafes, and it was deliberate human actions that caused the catastrophy.
So escalators are a good example, human greed is the bad example.

[–] harambe69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

At least someone with some sense can observe the amount of people on an elevator and nope out of that collective act of stupidity. I say that qualifies as graceful degradation.

[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

I thought that as well, then the weight of us going up caused it to go down.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 51 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Now please learn about Progressive enhancement. If you ever do a webpage, use this.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Modern web designers: "Nope. Best I can do is 'You must enable Javascript to view this webpage.'"

[–] grue@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's a dark pattern to steal your data.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

Its a dark pattern to make me instantly leave the web page.

[–] Zagorath@quokk.au 1 points 1 week ago

Maybe sometimes, especially among the bigger and more infamously privacy-invasive sites.

A lot of the time, though, it's just that it's the easiest way to write a website. Particularly if you're using modern frameworks, you have to go quite a way out of your way to send static HTML that works well without JS enabled.

[–] kazerniel@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

nice timing, I heard of it literally today from this Smashing Magazine article :D

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ooh, nice! Will read.

[–] 48954246@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm reminded of the recent image of the curiosity tyre

[–] harambe69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

But do you know that they can just rip off a wheel that has been damaged enough to become a burden?

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 23 points 1 week ago

Tabletop rpg design uses the term "fail gracefully" to describe being able to still function when you forget the rules.

Older games used to regularly stop amd collapse into boring chart-reading and index-looking-up. A lot of modern games are entirely playable if you forget everything except the core mechanic.

[–] jaded_genie@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Funny that’s like nature works too. I’m dead inside and still working enough to work

[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Just think of the shareholder value tho

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The corporations can't sell you an overpriced newer model of your old one doesn't completely die from the slightest issue.

[–] saimen@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah, it's kind of the exact opposite of planned obsolescence.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

The internet works this way too. Blow up one undersea cable and traffic rerouted somewhere else, but slower.

[–] m4xie@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

That's interesting, but I need two types of batteries to use it at full power.

[–] wurstgulasch3000@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

a few bad years I hope that was at least partially a joke or I feel really bad for that person