this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
204 points (99.0% liked)

Lemmy

12443 readers
66 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
204
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by fievel@lemm.ee to c/lemmy@lemmy.ml
 

Number of (active) Lemmy users seems to stabilize and I think this is a great thing. Indeed we got a lot of users when reddit shutdown its API (I was among them despite being a long time oss user), many have left, but the community seems now to stabilize to ~ ½ of the big grow in june '23. I think this is very nice for lemmy, we can be proud of this project.

The stats come from: https://fedidb.org/software/lemmy

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 50 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I’m from a time on the internet when a sizable forum had a few thousand people registered and a few hundred active users. For people who want a 1:1 replacement for high volume, endless scrolling social media I guess any decline is bad. But frankly I am extremely “retvrn” about the pace and size of the old internet, so I’d still be happy with even fewer users, lol.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

For me it's more about something with the potential to undermine the deathgrip of facebook, twitter, etc from our societies, in an attempt to partially address the steady increase in utter braindead stupidity and mindless vitriolic hatred stemming from profit-driven algorithmic control of our broader information ecosystem.

That requires the eventual growth of a decentralized sister ecosystem of sorts, able to act as a viable competitor. So, to compete with the giants, that's basically a fairly significant chunk of everyone. On Earth.

Fortunately you can always just defederate the highest population centers, I imagine that would become very common eventually. Especially if they tried monetization or something, which would probably not be unheard of with larger userbases.

All that said, I do feel you and also personally like smaller communities. But I'll just move to one once World gets too big.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 8 months ago

I completely agree with that, while at the same time just moving everyone that’s on Facebook/Xitter/Reddit/etc onto here just sounds like an absolute nightmare. 😂 I’m here to get less of that shit, the same way the internet in general was an escape for me before the age of mass social media.

In an ideal world I would love for mass social media to be broken up by the fediverse, just preferably where I don’t have to see it. That’s why I’m on Blahaj ✌️

[–] Fermion@mander.xyz 25 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I set up multiple profiles on different instances as there were quite a few downtime events when I started. Now things are a little more stable and I only use two. I wonder how much of that decline is from redundant profiles going dark without actually losing the user.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

... good point. I have a lemmy.ca alt for this exact reason.

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I wish I could view other instances as a guest. I love the voyager app so much but it doesn't seem I can do this.

I don't want ro set up loads of accounts just to browse.

I'm on lemm.ee which I think has de federated with a lot but still got the tankie subs. So I'll be interested to know what I'm missing. Lemmy.world needs my email so that one can fuck off. Don't know what else to choose.

[–] Fermion@mander.xyz 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I chose mander.xyz and feddit.nl partially because neither require an email address. I haven't really kept track of who all they have and have not defederated from. I think both don't defederate much. I use the block feature in Connect liberally to remove the communities I don't care to see, like the tankies.

[–] CorrodedCranium@leminal.space 19 points 8 months ago (4 children)

What defines an active user?

[–] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 30 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Up through Lemmy version 0.18.5, "active" meant posting or commenting within a specified timeframe (past month, past year, etc.). Starting with version 0.19.0 voting also counts as being active.

[–] ladfrombrad@lemdro.id 23 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Starting with version 0.19.0 voting also counts as being active.

aka, the lurkers 👀

I've always upvoted both posts that are on topic to the community and always to people who take the time out of their day to reply.

It's like common courtesy to me and votes are like free confetti anyways.

So I suppose the OP's figures are, off.

[–] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 13 points 8 months ago

Yep, there must be lots of uncounted lurkers. If you look at the active user charts at The Federation there was a spike in December when 0.19.0 released. I expect we'll see more spikes as additional instances upgrade to 0.19.

https://the-federation.info/platform/73

[–] lunchboxhero@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 8 months ago

I am uncounted, but next month I will be active!

[–] CorrodedCranium@leminal.space 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Interesting. It's not really relevant to this graph because it only shows one instance but I'd be curious to see what percentage of Lemmy's total active users are people with multiple accounts on different instances

[–] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago

I suspect abandoned alt accounts are a huge reason for the long, slow decline in user numbers. These graphs should be titled "active accounts," not "active users."

[–] Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Different sites use different ways of calculating but often a user is considered active if they posted anything in x amount of days.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago

Users active in the month. Likely only people who have posted or commented.

[–] spaduf@slrpnk.net 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

imo biggest thing to watch going into this year is whether or not the groups rework on Mastodon (currently listed as in-progress on their roadmap) improves federation between the two communities. At this point, how well a service federates with the larger network is probably the single most important aspect with regards to establishing natural growth. Not surprising as the strength of the fediverse is fundamentally interoperability.

[–] nutomic@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Im not sure how up to date that roadmap is, but the pull request for group support in Mastodon has been open for 1.5 years now. And for reasons I dont understand it was made intentionally incompatible with Lemmy. So dont get your hopes up.

[–] spaduf@slrpnk.net 3 points 8 months ago

Roadmap is updated recently. They did a poll to establish priorities given the recent surge in users sometime around November.

[–] spaduf@slrpnk.net 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Coming back to this topic after some time. What do you think about the private group criticism of FEP-1b12? Is this resolvable without leaving the standard set by FEP-1b12? My first instinct is yes, but I imagine you've given this a lot more thought than I have.

[–] nutomic@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago

Private groups are definitely possible, in fact we are planning to implement them in Lemmy soon. I already made a pull request for local only communities which is a first step in this direction.

[–] Aurix@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Many had and have multiple accounts due to federation shenanigans. The actual userbase might have actually grown despite significantly lower numbers compared to the peak.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It took me a while to find an instance that I liked. I'm sure I counted as multiple active users until recently.

In reality, I'm the same one human who has been accessing the same servers.

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Fuck this means I should start finding things to post, doesn't it?

Or does commenting count?

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Those beans ain’t going to post themselves. Get to it.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 2 points 8 months ago

I wouldn't be surprised if further enshitification leads to periodic bumps.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Ooof... That is terrible. Only decline. I expected it to grow at least slowly, but this is just sad. And makes the dozen (niche even) duplicate sublemmies even worse. One sublemmy for every person to take to themselves.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 20 points 8 months ago

One nice part of this is that the current level means that the next big event causing a wave away from Reddit will hold onto more people, since there's content here for them to see and read. When the last big batch came over 6 months ago, it was pretty bare and a lot of people left immediately.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 7 points 8 months ago

There was a huge surge of people on reddit creating accounts driven by the API saga, it wasn't natural growth. The normal expectation is that most people would only stick around a short time. Having 50% remaining after the peak is honestly impressive! I'd expect it to continue falling for a while but eventually it should start to rise when natural growth exceeds the attrition from that event.

[–] Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Oh well, just wait till inevitably reddit does something stupid again and those numbers will go sky high again.

Also, if twitter where to fail eventually and a lot of people join mastadon, I think the amount of people using lemmy would also go up because people get familair with the fediverse.

[–] spaduf@slrpnk.net 3 points 8 months ago

Eh it's only just stabilized, now is exactly when we'd expect efforts for natural growth to become active. Worth noting, at this point growth probably comes from Mastodon not Reddit.

[–] comrade19@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Do the instances not interact with each other? Is it like playing a game in a different server and youll never see your friends in the game? Idk how it works

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 7 points 8 months ago

No, that's not how it works. Instances absolutely interact, that's the whole idea of federation. It can get more complicated than that if you want to get into the details of how it works, but that knowledge isn't in any way necessary to just use the platform.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 months ago

They are (mostly) federated, which means that users from one can see what's on the others. There are a few exceptions to this, primarily for extremist content which are not federated with most of the other servers.

[–] Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

So all lemmy servers can communicate with eachother, unless a server decided to "defederate" with another which cuts the connection.

Futhermore, mastodon and other fediverse projects can also communicate with lemmy and back, but since the format of the posts and comments is a bit different this might take some work for the devs to get working completely correctly.

[–] everett@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

All four of the replies to your comment (as of now) are from users on different instances.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

While the other replies are not incorrect, what they describe is users on Reddit posting on different subreddits.

What I am talking about are lots of niche subreddits (many even about the same topic!) thus that out of the few people that are here, there is simply no content, let alone discussions of the present content.