this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2026
19 points (85.2% liked)

News

37285 readers
2525 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

article: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/2026/04/missing-scientists/686885/

The Atlantic has a long article on the story of missing scientists recently featured here on Slashdot. In short, it is an incoherent conspiracy theory that spreads wide and far, not paying any attention to boundaries of time, space, or area of expertise. "Which is all to say that another piece of flagrant nonsense has ascended to the highest levels of U.S. politics and media," writes the Atlantic's Daniel Engber. "To call it a conspiracy theory would be far too kind, because no comprehensive theory has been floated to explain the pattern of events. But then, even the phrase pattern of events is imprecise, because there is no pattern here at all. Given all the people who could have been roped into this narrative but weren't, any hope of finding meaning falls away. Barring any dramatic new disclosures, the mystery of the missing scientists has the dubious honor of being a sham in every way at once." - https://news.slashdot.org/story/26/04/22/1934234/the-missing-scientist-story-is-unbelievably-dumb

(I would post archive link but I'm blocked because of DNS, VPN, or something else...)

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

That’s just what someone who has eaten 10 scientists would say

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I get their point, but the tin foil hat is just too easy this time.

Most people are only getting the details and major events reported in the news. When something happens they draw conclusions from that incomplete data, a news article is not an unbiased record of events.

The flip side is that the cheeto-in-chief left pallets of classified documents in a bathroom down the hall from a xerox and it seems like an easy conclusion for the public to jump to that he speedran a Tom Clancy novel.

[–] AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

If anyone wanted to exploit international secrets, it would be a great time!

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

The Atlantic still employs an EiC who tried to hire Kevin "we should execute women who receive abortions for murder" Williamson because he thought the magazine needed more right wing voices. If they're saying something is unbelievably dumb and people need to stop talking about it that just makes me think there's something going on here and more people need to start talking about it.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world -1 points 15 hours ago

If conspiracy people were vulnerable to reason, they'd cease to exist.