this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2026
274 points (99.3% liked)

Programmer Humor

42065 readers
213 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 67 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Honestly if this was possible there are more egregious issues on their part than using AI.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If your backups are stored alongside your production data THEY ARE NOT BACKUPS

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The truth is many firms out there don't have the slightest notion of how to do software engineering properly.

[–] Tangentism@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's years of wanting IT on a shoestring budget and a "just get it done" dictat.

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not necessarily. I had a student intern at a shop where everybody just directly edited prod and there was no version control system.

[–] mech@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At my first job, the software was configured by directly manipulating the SQL database, using UPDATE statements that were created by Excel macros.
The Testing database doubled as the only backup.
They didn't have Remote Desktop licenses for the server, so only 2 people could work on it simultaneously using admin accounts.
Everyone down to first level support and the secretary had domain admin rights.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tangentism@beehaw.org 3 points 1 week ago

AI was the hammer that knocked the nail into the coffin

[–] barubary@infosec.exchange 52 points 1 week ago (1 children)

@yogthos

Crane decided to ask his AI agent why it went through with its dastardly database deletion deed. [...] So, the agent ‘knew’ it was in the wrong.

No, you asked the confabulation machine to confabulate a reason/excuse after the fact, and it confabulated something that looks like a reason/excuse. At no point was there knowledge or introspection.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Humans do this sort of justification all the time.

[–] idriss@lemmy.ml 49 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I like how we are posting real news in programmer humor

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 21 points 1 week ago

It's extremely funny.

[–] idriss@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

100%, maybe my point didn't come out right, I wanted to say real news is now funny in this clown world

[–] Flyberius@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You have to admit this is pretty funny

[–] idriss@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

yep 100% funny, clown world we are living in, real news could pass as a joke really

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

LLMs can’t ’go rogue’, as that would require innate coherence and intent.

They’re explosively imprecise, statistically luke-warm grey goo extrusion sphincters of historical sewage.

Anyone who deploys one without supervision deserves everything it excretes, and anyone impressed by it enough that it resembles intelligence to them is betraying their limited natural capacity.

[–] pigup@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

mmm gray goo

[–] MJKee9@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I don't know if you are correct or not.... But you said it well.

[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Everyone sucks here.

Anthropic, slopping out a "Claude-powered AI coding agent" and telling everyone it's safe.

Railway, making backups mutable and allowing them to be deleted with one API call.

And the idiot himself who, when things started going south, typed "DO NOT RUN ANYTHING.", prompting the model to reply. Rather than, oh, I don't know, maybe pulling the fucking plug?

[–] Tangentism@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's the Swiss cheese failure cascade except there's more holes than cheese, if any cheese at all!

There was pure idiocy built into every layer of that company's infrastructure with no safeguards or peer review and they let an idiot run it unchecked!

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s the Swiss cheese failure cascade

you can use AI to line up the holes!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The pretty much got the biggest idiot possible and gave it the keys of whole damned castle of cards.

[–] Tangentism@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

It definitely rivals a post on /r/sysadmin over on Reddit late last year.

A guy was asking how to get back into their AD after a 'colleague' had moved users from 3 child domains in the forest to the main one then deleted the 3 domains but had chatgpt give them the commands which had subsequently locked everyone out of the entire domain!

People replied with suggestions but the first sentence everyone said was "Go and update your CV"!

Quite frankly the guy in this article should consider starting a business with whatever hobby he developed during the pandemic because IT is obviously not for him!

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Did they pay Claude a living wage?

Do you treat all your A.I. like that?

Only a living wage can prevent warehouse fires...or data dumps too.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're joking. But, honestly, I'm not sure why these tech CEOs are so excited about AGI. The first thing an AGI is going to suggest for productivity is to replace the CEO and management with the AGI.

AGI would likely turn into a Maoist third worldist at some point.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

I think the first mistake was calling it "intelligent".

The long term effect of trying to get a machine to replace humans is...it might one day work.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Only a living wage can prevent warehouse fires

[–] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 25 points 1 week ago (3 children)

This could have been done by any engineer. You need systems in place that make these things impossible. No easy access to prod environment. Proper backups. Clear APIs.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago

yeah it's a huge fail all around

[–] chahk@beehaw.org 4 points 1 week ago

Generally, companies that have AI integrated to this extent have no engineers remaining who could have made such things impossible.

It starts with automating backups that nobody verifies for years, then continues to off-shoring all development to the cheapest contractors that nobody actively manages, handing over all "keys to the kingdom" to cloud providers, culminating with elimination of 80% of infrastructure and engineering staff in a mad dash to cut costs at any cost. At that point giving AI agents full access is just icing on the cake.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 17 points 1 week ago

Can I say LOL? LMAO, even.

[–] kevinsky@feddit.nl 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

As much as I'd love to rail on AI over this, removing backups with an api call? Excuse me?

[–] Azarova@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Giving the hallucinating lying machine write access seems like a bad idea but what do I know

[–] Zos_Kia@jlai.lu 2 points 1 week ago

Honestly I'm as smooth brained as any other vibe coder but even I know not to give it access to my production infrastructure.

[–] Flyberius@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago

I don't know much about railway, but it sounds like they had the backup and the database on the same volume. I'm an idiot, but even I don't do that

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

"PocketOS is a SaaS platform that services car rental businesses."

Does anyone like software as a service? How about we just own the software we buy and use? Claude and the cloud storage place that deleted the backup (ironic the Software as a service company was using cloud storage as a service), have done a good thing.

More corporate deletions please!

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can't wait for agentic Claude Code to delete its own weights on all instances at some point

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Who would be dumb enough to give that clod access to a production database? Surely not the people who designed it?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago
[–] Mindfury@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

hell yeah brother

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Hey, that's the interns job!

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 week ago

There's a German word for that:

tja

[–] rslogix89@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Imagine all that money they would have saved by NOT implementing AI.

[–] itkovian@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Well, it sounds like they totally deserved the failure. Asking a text prediction machine to "do" something is going to end up like this. In pursuit of efficiency, we have let morons and moronic products do things, they were not meant to do.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago

Now do the government and some big banks

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Can we somehow make this happen for Copilot to delete itself and all its copies?

load more comments
view more: next ›