Just post something 💛
Lemmy's general purpose discussion community with no specific topic.
Sitewide lemmy.world rules apply here.
Additionally, this is a no AI content community. We are here for human interaction, not AI slop! Posts or comments flagged as AI generated will be removed.
It sounds dangerous as heck:
I used to dread the concept of intentional climate modification as too much chance of something going wrong and leaving us even worse off (see the moisture changes in China after planting all those trees).
But yeah, it’s time. We’ve screwed up badly enough that we almost certainly need to do something. Let’s get going on some small to medium trials and suss that out
So you want more acidification of the oceans?
Raising the calcium carbonate compensation depth? Killing all the invertebrate?
You know what happens when algae grow too much? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_zone_(ecology)
I mean that's the idea though. Grow it, let it die, become sediment. This isn't like a fun thing to do randomly. It's because the alternative is everything dies.
That's one of the weak points of the idea. Things just don't drop to the bottom of the ocean, there are layers that separate the waters. So to sequester the carbon as permanently as possible takes energy to get through all of that. The other issue is feeding this growth. It won't grow without an input of fertilizer, and that requires more infrastructure and energy use, plus depletes those resources elsewhere. There is no solution to this. Even the real direction that we should take, reduction of emissions, has costs that are bad for lots of people.
This isn't a suggestion of inaction, just a note of realism, since the post is framed in the tone of "here's something no one knows about" that will solve things.