this post was submitted on 06 May 2026
268 points (99.6% liked)

politics

29705 readers
2602 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Just more evidence that '24 was one of the most winnable elections of all time, an opportunity just thrown into the trash by abwd/ people who didn't want to hear about accountability when it comes to Democrats..

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 78 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

Just more evidence that '24 was one of the most winnable elections of all time

Or, or or, and hear me out: Trump being in office for another year and a half has served as a stark reminder of how shitty Republicans actually are, and even Republicans are angry about it. American voters as a collective are fickle, stupid, incurious, and confoundingly forgetful. The district is considered a swing seat roughly mirroring Michigan statewide, and we've seen a consistent trend across the country of Democrats overperforming after Trump took office and somehow displayed even worse leadership than in his first term. Democrats did considerably better in 2026 than they did in 2022 despite having the same district map, and Harris narrowly won the 35th in 2024. The much larger margin clearly reflects anti-Trump sentiment caused by his time in office.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe 4 points 4 days ago

I've been tracking politics for 60 years, and every now and then there is a surprise midterm that is a much bigger bloodbath than expected, and the current political environment is more ripe for that than any time in my life.

When this is over, besides the House races that they are counting on, we are going have 5-10 House flips that NOBODY saw coming.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Trump being in office for another year and a half has served as a stark reminder of how shitty Republicans actually are

You know what would've been an even better reminder? A fucking criminal trial for Jan 6 (among other crimes!), followed by conviction and imprisonment of the traitor-in-chief.

They had four whole fucking years to get it done, yet managed to fumble it in a way that can only be described as "deliberate."

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Biden: 4 years can't even fire the janitor Trump hired

Trump: 4 months, dismantled 5 agencies installed 10 corrupt judges and pardoned 100 rapists

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Every time. Just be happy the Democrats can get more control and stop or slow down the Trump shit show. Just because they aren't going to enact your ideal political and economic system doesn't mean it's not what we badly need right now.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world -2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Just because they aren’t going to enact your ideal political and economic system doesn’t mean it’s not what we badly need right now.

If Democrats continue to ignore developing a deep understanding of why voters behave the way they do, similar to your obtuse, misguided, and obviously bad faith understanding of voting, they'll continue to struggle against Trump, Republicans, and whatever comes next.

Michigan told the both the Biden and Harris campaigns what policy changes were required to get their votes. The campaigns chose to ignore the information they were given. Michigan voters told the campaign where they were at and why, the campaigns chose to ignore that information, and you are apologizing for that by blaming the voters for not wanting a candidate who supports genocide.

And its quite literally disgusting that you take this bad faith interpretation. It truly leaves me with the understanding that you are an apologist for genocide: because what else could you be?

Commenters who regularly come to these conversations with the shitlib/ third way/ Blue MAGA victim complex that voters need to just do what they are told: They're wreckers. They kept the Biden campaign and later the Harris campaign in support of genocide. They've not one clue of what it takes to win elections. They're literally working constantly to lose further elections with their unwillingness to develop a basic understanding of how elections work.

If stopping Trump is their true goal, they should keep as far away from the conversation around "what we should do" as possible. They handed the country to fascism twice.

[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 1 points 2 days ago

Possibly ABAWD - Able-bodied adults without dependents

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I don't think 24 was highly winnable for Democrats. It was a coin toss year that they fumbled by pretending Biden was remotely ok to be a candidate.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It being a coin toss is the result of their fumbling. Long before his decline was obvious, and across many races, Democrats were underperforming.

It's definitely due to their planning/messaging. Obama won with huge margins on both presidential campaigns, running on a message people believed in. No one since has come close, either in messaging or results.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago

Obama won in one of the best years for a Democrat candidate in probably 40 years. Hillary probably could have won then as well.

[–] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago

I hope we can get out of this with no bloodshed.