this post was submitted on 06 May 2026
778 points (99.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

45889 readers
1545 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The phrase “tax the rich” can be “just as hateful as some disgusting racial slurs”, according to the New York City billionaire Steve Roth, who said that the top 1% should be “praised and thanked”.

Speaking on his company’s quarterly earnings call on Tuesday, Roth, the CEO of Vornado Realty Trust, expressed his support for fellow billionaire and the CEO of Citadel, Ken Griffin, who was singled out in the 15 April announcement by New York’s mayor, Zohran Mamdani, of the state’s first “pied-à-terre” tax on second homes valued at more than $5m. In a video, Mamdani announced the policy in front of Griffin’s penthouse, which he said was purchased for $238m.

“We are all shocked that our young mayor would pull this stunt in front of Ken’s home and single him out for ridicule,” Roth said. “This was both irresponsible and dangerous.”

Edit: Mamdani's video that sparked this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLKZnVB4F9k

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bluedragon012@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

If that's true, then we are using it right. I'd only use a slur on beings that are less than human and ultra rich fit that pereftly. And as well read as the rich are, they know what happens when a being is considered less than human. >:D

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 hours ago

We really should make a list. Not like in list format, something more durable like baking it into some type of meme.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 20 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Man with more money than he could possibly use in his life is upset at the suggestion that some portion of the money he will never used could be used to help other people.

Being a billionaire is a sign of mental illness and needs to start being treated as such.

[–] WiredBrain@lemmy.ca 2 points 27 minutes ago

Financial obesity

[–] Clutter@sh.itjust.works 19 points 5 hours ago

Mamdani is choosing the lesser evil here my dear rich person... The other options is: we kill you.

[–] WandowsVista@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

makes sense, rich people are the only truly protected class

[–] deadymouse@lemmy.world 36 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Oh, I think he'll like this inevitable outcome then.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 56 points 9 hours ago

Just to highlight that as a real estate magnate, his entire empire is built on rent-seeking, i.e. accumulating wealth by the hoarding of a limited resource, without having created anything of value.

This billionaire did not create a billion dollars of value for society, even indirectly; he only took it from others.

[–] Man_kind@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 hours ago

This is why the rich need to be taxed.

[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 27 points 8 hours ago

"Tax the rich" is the 99% being nice. We could go the France in 1792 route.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

I didn't know the rich were a race though at this point they've probably have been having their genes modified.

[–] Sirdubdee@piefed.social 1 points 3 hours ago

People that say that aren’t even rich.

[–] WhyDoYouThinkThat@lemmy.world 15 points 8 hours ago
[–] DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago

Oh rich please.

[–] peaceful_world_view@lemmy.world 18 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] SirHery@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

Eat himmmmm.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 12 points 8 hours ago

That's pretty funny because the phrase doesn't actually have a negative meaning. It's a policy proposal at face value and at depth and that's it. Doesn't say the rich or bad people, although many of them are, doesn't say that nobody should be rich, doesn't even say how much they should be taxed.

And certainly nobody should be thanking the top 1%. We all know that they got there by lying and cheating and stealing and inheriting wealth.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

how much proof do we need that the rich are a different species?

[–] man_wtfhappenedtoyou@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

They aren't, they are just sick. As with any sick animal, they should be put down.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 34 points 11 hours ago

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 36 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

"TAX" is going to be the softest, most palateable verb that will be done to them, the alternatives are a little less polite.

[–] proofchampionship184@lemmy.zip 10 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

“Oh, would you prefer ‘torture and execute’ then?” Lmao

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 6 points 9 hours ago

My favourite phrase, or at least one that's given me a glimmer of hope for the future is "They will have to invent a new word for what the people are going to do to those responsible."

[–] jestho@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BaraCoded@literature.cafe 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] jestho@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

Needs an x to sound scary

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 14 points 10 hours ago
[–] Longylonglong@sh.itjust.works 14 points 11 hours ago

Maybe he should just go fuck himself

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 7 points 10 hours ago

Ebenezer Scrooge, is that you?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 19 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It he prefers "eat the rich", I won't object.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 hours ago

Don’t eat shit.

Mulch the rich.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Okay, here's the politically correct version then:

Take a portion of the income and wealth of people of wealth they don't plan on investing in a short period of time (not paid out as wages, etc.).

[–] Danarchy@lemmy.nz 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Lol chop chop, guoillo-bait

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Well he's not wrong, it's definitely hateful. We don't say it because we think it's fair they get billions and we have to scrape by while doing the actual work.

[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

That doesn’t make it hateful in the sense that it has been used recently. It’s just a normal response to someone’s horrible behaviour.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 33 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

"Tax the rich" is putting it very nicely.

They've dehumanized themselves with their monstrous exploitation.

load more comments
view more: next ›