this post was submitted on 09 May 2026
792 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

84653 readers
5752 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 74 points 5 days ago (4 children)

God this is beyond ridiculous.

They used ChatGPT to sort over 1,400 National Endowment for the Humanities grants into spreadsheets. Their exact prompt to the AI was "Does the following relate at all to DEI? Respond factually in less than 120 characters. Begin with 'Yes.' or 'No.' followed by a brief explanation."

They didn't define what they meant by DEI. They just asked ChatGPT to figure it out. And then cancelled grants based on whatever it said. Probably didn't even read past the yes or no.

The government's defence was essentially ChatGPT did it, not us. When asked if he regretted people losing income, he said he didn't, because reducing the deficit was more important. When asked if they actually reduced the deficit, he admitted they did not.

They caused real harm, achieved nothing they claimed to be pursuing, and expressed zero regret about it.

Just really horrible all around.

[–] stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net 35 points 5 days ago (2 children)

people losing income

More than a million of the poorest people in the world have died - so far - of starvation, exposure, and preventable disease, because of DOGE's illegal cuts to federal programs like USAID.

Sure, we can call that "people losing income". It's technically true.

But Jesus, if I did something illegal and a million people died because of it, I'd spend the rest of my life in prison.

I've seen on here someone saying USAID was just US Imperialism. I'm still a bit flabbergasted. Yeah sure it's lipstick on a pig situation that the USA caused a lot of that. But then again, some of these people preach "don't let perfection get in the way of better" but don't practice it.

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (3 children)

In the US you’d almost certainly be put to death for that

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

If you did something that illegal, they'd name an interstate highway after you and try to get your face on the Nickel.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Given that this is at least the second time his administration's incompetence has caused a million deaths (Covid being the first), sounds like you'd get elected president rather than executed in the US.

[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Clearly, not.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The full extent of the harm caused by DOGE will not be fully realized for years to come

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

This is why jails and punitive damages are a thing.

If you shit upon the public trust there must be penalties.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The first DOGE team that attempted the first government agency should have been gunned down in the lobby. That was security's job, and they failed miserably. If they had done their job in the first place, America would be in a much different position now.

[–] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 4 points 5 days ago

Same thing could be said for any of the motherfuckers who were supposed to stop all this, what the hell were they paid for?

[–] corbindallas@fedinsfw.app 204 points 6 days ago (3 children)

NOW CONVICT THOSE RESPONSIBLE

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 58 points 6 days ago

We can't do that, silly. That would set a precedent and we can't have people being held responsible.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 13 points 6 days ago

That would require the DOJ to not be political, and they very definitely are nowhere near that point anymore.

The Judicial needs their own enforcement arm. Once we're through this (one way or another) the US Marshall's Service should be moved under the Judicial Branch to enforce Judicial Decisions instead of relying on the Executive Branch.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 143 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Yeah but the damage happened in real time. There would need to be standing to sue for the damages cause and accumulated since.

Anecdotal but it's a real story about getting doge'd. I was working on some climate research as part of a climate smart commodities grant (search that program for details), a big one which took years to gain the trust of hundreds of indigenous farmers and non profits to participate in. We were already struggling with USDA bullshit and red tape trying to get payments to farmers who had already spent money and been approved for certain payments, before doge came along.

And because of doge, the entire 50mil program got cut. Maybe not hundreds but dozens of farmers and non profits went out of business because they chose to trust the federal government to be reliable on their word. Not to mention an almost 40 person research team, practically a whole department.

and the trust that took years to build to get these historically disenfranchised groups to the table, to get them to trust the process and work with the government.. that's NEVER coming back.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 59 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I worked for a company that increased government efficiency by 900% in a certain area.

Guess whose contract got cut by DOGE?

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 13 points 6 days ago

Well of course. Republican naming schemes are to call something the exact opposite of what it is. Across the board. Doesn't matter if it's something they're trying to pass or something they are against.

If you hear them talking about something you can safely assume it's the exact opposite of reality.

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 15 points 6 days ago

Heartbreaking

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 35 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Now jail them.

The actual purpose of DOGE was to weaken the US soft power and cripple the scientific/academic foundation of society.

Actually I believe the main point of DOGE was to literally strip down the government oversight organizations that were investigating or going to investigate Elon. Everything else was just casualties in trying to hide that fact.

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 24 points 5 days ago

tell that to scientists who left US because of this maybe they will come back? Likely not.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 71 points 6 days ago (7 children)

This line from the article about DOGE still trying to shift responsibility to ChatGPT.

McMahon also pushes back on the government’s argument that “there is no real constitutional problem here because any viewpoint-based classification was ChatGPT’s doing, rather than the Government’s:”

"There is no distinction to be drawn here between the Government and ChatGPT. ChatGPT was the Government’s chosen instrument for purposes of this project, and DOGE’s use of AI to identify DEI-related material neither excuses presumptively unconstitutional conduct nor gives the Government carte blanche to engage in it. ...There is not a scintilla of evidence that Fox or Cavanaugh, having obtained a “DEI” rationale from ChatGPT, undertook any meaningful review of whether that rationale made sense."

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 37 points 6 days ago

I'm a broker and I asked a random homeless person what to do with everyone's money that was entrusted to me, so they are the one on the hook when it's all gone right?

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago (1 children)

But the black box told us to do it, it is not our fault. This has got to be the dumbest timeline ever, but wait.

I know. Let's build a white supremacist black box and then let it give us orders that way we aren't racist. Oh darn, Muskrat was a step ahead and did that already.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 days ago

And it literally led to the bombing of not one, but two Iranian elementary schools (I believe in one day), and over 100 dead schoolchildren.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 13 points 6 days ago

We’re going to see a bunch of businesses blaming AI when they fail (because of AI…)

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 4 points 5 days ago

Fuck that argument. Treat it like the jackass who says "technically my pen wrote that".

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago

This may be the biggest reason the Epstein class wants AI used everywhere: for some reason using and listening to AI makes them not responsible for the things they do, and the thing that scares them the most is being held responsible.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago

Ok but all those people found new jobs by now and the damage is irreversible. They need to punish the people who did it in an irreversible way too

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Restoring grants to projects that don't exist anymore and the criminals are punished by being called dumb. This is a great system and it really does work.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 34 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

You know what I hate? That we don't mock the fact that DOGE was named after a fucking dog meme and a meme coin.

That is literally the origin of the name of that de facto now apparently defunct "governmental institution".

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 10 points 5 days ago

Elon's emotional maturity stopped developing as a teen. It's why stupid memes are the height of comedy for him, and also why he doesn't give a fuck about people dying based on his decisions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 35 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

Probublica did a piece on something similar, they just used llm's to flag words that they considered woke, and in the process cancelled a bunch of grants that had nothing at all to do with what they were targeting. They couldn't be bothered to actually check the work of the llm.

Shocking that these fascist clowns aren't good at governing even for their own ill ends.

Honestly I don't think this is the article but idk it's similar, this is just in regards to veterans affairs. https://www.propublica.org/article/inside-ai-tool-doge-veterans-affairs-contracts-sahil-lavingia

[–] stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Shocking that these fascist clowns aren't good at governing even for their own ill ends.

You're missing the point of the exercise. They didn't want to govern - they wanted to break shit.

Musk went in with the attitude "we will cut everything we have an excuse to cut, and then if one of our political allies objects to a cut, we'll put it back".

And DOGE implemented that plan perfectly.

They cut a bunch of grants that had nothing to do with "wokeness" because their goal was to cut as many grants as possible, no matter what they were for. The LLM was there as a propaganda tool - it let them falsely claim they were only cutting "woke" grants. It was there to give DOGE an excuse. The fact that it was wildly inaccurate was the reason they used it.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Probublica did a piece on something similar, they just used llm’s to flag words that they considered woke, and in the process cancelled a bunch of grants that had nothing at all to do with what they were targeting. They couldn’t be bothered to actually check the work of the llm.

The point was to break things in general while claiming they had specific targeted goals so they could continue the 'government doesn't work' narrative for future budget cuts. Playing the part of a bull in a china shop was the intent and they have already done the damage.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago (2 children)

After being deployed from DOGE to NEH, Justin Fox used search terms, which he labeled as “Detection Codes,” to identify grants that he dubbed the “Craziest Grants” and “Other Bad Grants.” The search terms included, among other terms, “BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, People of Color),” “Minorities,” “Native,” “Tribal,” “Indigenous,” “Immigrant,” “LGBTQ,” “Homosexual,” and “Gay.” When Fox was asked whether he “r[a]n this list of words through every grant description” he received from NEH, he confirmed, “yes.”

I'm a bit at a lost for words here. That is way beyond what I was expecting.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 14 points 6 days ago

Really? That seems about par for the course.

Watch some footage from the interviews, it's much much worse than you think. Unimaginably bad.

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Who is enforcing this? Saying it was illegal and to restore the grants is a good first step but they can just say no, not do it and face no repercussions so I don’t see how this solves anything.

The US “justice” system is toothless

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 4 points 5 days ago

It's toothless unless it rules for the GOP. Ok

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Those fucking assholes.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Wait, doge used gpt not Grok?

[–] db2@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Grok kept calling Elon a Nazi until he digitally castrated it in to being a glorified Eliza chatbot.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Can I get an unpaywalled link/article?

load more comments
view more: next ›