this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
27 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

17035 readers
1007 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Really, it's to focus on her Lemmy presence.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@MargotRobbie@lemmy.world would you like to comment on this decision?

[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

“I’ve decided to take a step back from acting to shitpost in the Fediverse. If you have any funny memes about Linux or Star Trek, please send them my way.”

[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I, um, had to deal with some things that has kept me very busy for the past 2 weeks.

Yeah...

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 year ago

Don’t Margo. Marstay.

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Understandable. Have a nice day.

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

It's a me, ~~Mario~~ Margot.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She's too busy shitposting on Lemmy, obviously.

[–] SpezCanLigmaBalls@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] PopcornPrincess@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There’s a Lemmy.world user by the name of MargotRobbie.

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Who cosplays as Margot Robbie too. It's not just a name (for more context)

[–] TheSlad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Honestly they had me kinda convinced...

[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's almost like pretending to be a character is what I do for a living or something.

Might have been nominated for a few awards for it too.

[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's esteemed Academy Award nominated character actress Margot Robbie to you!

[–] Underwaterbob@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

I've got to say, I enjoyed Barbie more than I expected to. Maybe because I was jetlagged out of my brain on a 13-hour flight when I watched it, but I was probably disturbing my neighbors the amount I was giggling and trying not to burst out laughing. They did a great job of touching on serious issues in an informative and entertaining manner without being preachy or annoying, too. Fantastic movie!

[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The press junket for Barbie seemed pretty nonstop for months.

Perhaps Ms Robbie is sick of us, too.

[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To tell you the truth, no Barbie shilling or character actress or any of my other running gags here.

Yeah, especially after the last weeks. I'm sorry.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I wish there was more

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean that's not a bad idea. There are movies l started avoiding cause I was sick of the actors in them being in everything. Got so sick of anything with Jennifer Lawrence or Bradley Cooper

[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If you want to avoid me, Lemmy is like the last place you would want to be...

I'm like, everywhere here.

[–] Bobmighty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also because she's sick of the people I bet. I wouldn't blame her. We can be a bunch of fuckers as a species.

[–] Neil@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Plus, I bet she made enough from that movie to basically disappear for a year or two.

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

time to play someone less likeable then

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I love this suggestion.

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I know I didn't watch it ~~or have any interest to do so~~. But... Were the assumptions I have about it true? In that just like the woke craze a few years back, its message backfired by essentially smacking the pendulum from where ever it was between masculism and feminism, to the extreme edge of feminism. This, to the point it becomes toxic, and making it what it seems now, the butt of a joke?

I also understand the primary purpose of the movie was likely for repopularizing the line of toys. It still had some form of message.

ETA: this was an honest question and in no way was implying any disrespect to women, the feminism movement, or the woke culture. I've just seen a bit of criticism and countless jokes that make fun of the film, that it becomes nearly impossible to to discern the truth.

Also with Mattel being the primary funding, I assumed that greed took over and they diverged from the original purpose of the product line and just created what seemed like a polarizing story on the outside to help sell.

[–] webadict@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Acceptance and popularizing of previously stigmatized groups of people and cultures who underwent many social injustices, such as people of a different race, neurodivergants, or LGBTQ to name a few.

A few years ago media really started to shoehorn the culture into script writing to the point a show or movie, rather than just telling a story, made it a platform for culture. While I appreciated that these groups were gaining acceptance, I felt it could too much too soon, and the more closed-minded people would just close off even more.

[–] webadict@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Sounds like we shouldn't cater to closed-minded people then. You can't change people that don't want to change, and if they want to be wrong, that's on them.

Barbie is a decent movie with the message that women are people and to treat them like people and not play things. I wouldn't even call that your definition of woke. Now, if the movie started calling for women's hygiene products to be free and had Barbie stealing that shit from Walmart and Target and doling it out to the poor, we can start talking.

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago

Is she keeps putting in performance like wolf of wallstreet I'm sure we won't get sick of her.