this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
764 points (99.2% liked)

Science Memes

20210 readers
1415 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 226 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 54 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I may just be a humble penis operator, so excuse the ignorance, but don't they make toys for this situation? Something the sheep lack?

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 97 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm also just a penis operator, but the joke to me is that neither of them is capable of initiating anything, just waiting for the topper

[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 30 points 5 days ago

Ah, that makes sense. Thanks, friendo!

[–] trublu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 5 days ago

A different interpretation: a "bottom" doesn't like to play the penetrative role in sex, and so two bottoms become frustrated in a sexual scenario with each other.

[–] CallMeButtLove@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Serious question: is this as big of a deal with lesbians as it would be for gay men?

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 22 hours ago

A male couple who both prefer one side or the other can swap on whatever schedule they want. At least that was how it worked it while I was with another man who also preferred the submissive role

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 days ago

as a lesbian, i have no idea and would also like to know

[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

That's what I was wondering as well.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 38 points 4 days ago
[–] GandalftheBlack@feddit.org 182 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I hope the author manages to fix their space key

[–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Yeah, I can't tell if s/he just had trouble finding it, or s/he was trying to... build new words??

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 55 points 5 days ago

"They" is a word that exists!

[–] spectrums_coherence@piefed.social 47 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

most likely copied from PDF, thus the line break is copied properly.

[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] wurstgulasch3000@feddit.org 4 points 4 days ago

I read it as lesbianship at first

[–] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 5 days ago

!fakebandnames@lemmy.world

[–] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 9 points 5 days ago

they're waiting for someone like you to come along and fix it.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 98 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Not surprising considering how many human lesbians do the same thing when interested in another.

[–] el_abuelo@programming.dev 64 points 5 days ago (1 children)

As a human male I have never felt so strongly that I belong to the opposite sex.

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 35 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 54 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I know this is probably a joke, but you are aware that freezing up and being unable to make a move is a common thing for all genders, right?

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago

Of course. I just thought the comment was very egg_irl-like.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago

I'm so offended by how absolutely correct you are
>:(

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's why my main advice to any woman seeking women is to make a move. Like, girl, you can't just sit there looking pretty at a gay bar and hope to get a girl, most of the women there are already trying that to no luck.

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

this is why dating has become orders of magnitude more difficult for me after i quit drinking. my entire strategy was drinking enough to drown out "what if she thinks I'm being creepy, what if she's mean, what if i say something stupid and get ostracized" until i could finally hear a tiny, slurred voice saying "lol wouldn't it be funny if you talked to that girl you think is pretty and it turns out she can tolerate your presence" enough to go talk to the girl

but now i am 31 and my cells have decided making enough alcohol dehydrogenase is too much of a hassle and i have decided being hungover is too much of a hassle, so now i just drink soda in the lesbian bar trying to look available but not pathetic (it's not working)

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ope, yeah. I'm the same age and currently facing the increasing brutality of hangovers pushing me to be more responsible with my drinking. It hasn't yet hit the point of not being able to take advantage of the liquid courage to talk to people. Fortunately I do have a sober trick from my crippling anxiety days of psyching myself up to just cross the point where it's more awkward to stop. It's weird to think I was stone sober when I tried a stupid line on my now wife lol.

And yeah I think the big trick is to learn to casually chat with anyone and to learn to flirt. The first gets you comfortable and the second lets you figure out if someone is interested. I'll admit I rarely make moves on someone because she looks available, but because she looks interesting or she's been interesting in conversation.

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

psyching myself up to just cross the point where it's more awkward to stop

this feels related to my executive function trick of "go do it for 5 minutes and then you can stop if you want" (i rarely stop after 5 min)

so i might try this. ty <3

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Yep! It's very similar because I didn't really understand the difference between my anxiety and executive dysfunction when I was a teenager figuring out how to cope with them both.

Good luck!

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I'm a big fan of Doctorov , but in this case I would like a citation.

I'm making interested to see how the gender of the ewes was determined. I mean if the indicator of sexual attraction is indistinguishable from normal behavior: standing still how could one prove the sheep to be lesbian.

edit after reading through various research I've come to the conclusion that the researcher, Perkins, just admitted that there's no way to study lesbian behavior in ewes, as the have no visible sexual expression (that the researchers know about)

It's as much a statement of the importance of the researcher as they depend on clear intercourse-like behavior to explain attraction. They can't see that in ewes, as their sexual behavior is passive. 'if they don't hump we can't tell their sexual preference'

Which is a bit weird as they argue that in males sexual preference is hormonal, so that should register in females too. But that isn't studied as there's no interest.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I suppose he should have said "gay ewes would be hobbled" and lesbian sheep would be incapable of coupling up".

His quote shows that people say there's no way of knowing one way or another, like you say, but Doctorow changed the language to be a bit more suggestive of certainty that the phenomenon exists.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

I have read through a couple of articles that I could relate to the Journal article. Most focus really heavily on the male sexual expression. I could read nothing about female still behavior.

That isn't strange, researchers focus mainly on the male sexual aspect, as that's where the money is for sheep farmers.

I am however still searching for the quote about female sexuality, I can't find it in Perkins, nor Stormshak's work.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 37 points 5 days ago

That is an absolutely incredible mental image.

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

Schroedinger's lesbian sheep

[–] MaryReads@lemmy.cafe 24 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I just can't find the paper. One Link to Harvard gives 404. Yay for the censorship of lesbian sheep

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

yeah this is kinda fascinating, would read

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 26 points 5 days ago

The lesbian black widow spiders have entered the chat...

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 12 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] Lowleekun@hexbear.net 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The joke maybe is that lesbians are shy and often do nothing if they think someone is cute. Just like standing still.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 2 points 4 days ago

Ahye I get that totally, but it just says it is a metaphor inside the image so I was confused because I was expecting layers

[–] BrickEater@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 6 points 4 days ago

Oh god it's the pillow princess meme for realsies

[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Sounds like rams could have a similar problem where they both think they want to kill each other

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 15 points 5 days ago (2 children)

This is even better than gay swans

[–] spinne@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago

I just think that's really nice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dippy@beehaw.org 7 points 5 days ago

They are all bottoms

load more comments
view more: next ›