Is it from Mickey?
check username
I'm so fucking smart. Hi Mickey :)
this post was submitted on 12 May 2026
52 points (71.0% liked)
Lemmy Shitpost
39758 readers
5537 users here now
Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.
Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means:
-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
1.Memes
10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)
Reach out to
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I'm going to guess that the guy who took this picture is wearing a blue polo shirt, light khaki shorts, with a dark brown belt, loafers with no socks.
I always wondered how they made pants that do this. Normally if you stretch material across two points it flattens across the span. Is this material just so thin that it doesn’t? Do they put a seam or darts in to intentionally pull it into the crack?
It's definitely designed to give you a voluntary wedgie. People pay for this.
Interesting that it's designed that way. From the front does it also give the wearer a moose knuckle?
Do they put a seam or darts in to intentionally pull it into the crack?
Yes. That and the garment might be undersized, while taking advantage of the high lycra/spandex content of the material.
I wondered the same, then my SO got one, it's a seam that makes it look real funny when not worn.
It’s a seam that’s ‘pinched’ so to speak, right in the crack of the ass.
Funnily enough it looks like a vertically stretched asshole when not being worn.
Amazing. I’m not sure why I’m surprised.
3 ... 2 ... 1 ... before it causes a shitstorm about sexualizing women
People that lead miserable empty lives can never grasp that something is just a joke
ehh, i tend to think that there's meaning in a lot of jokes
Good point. I recently went to see a stand up comedian. And while the rest of the audience was laughing I remained silent. I was focused on what exactly is the meaning of what the comedian was saying.
Honestly I find Lemmy to be generally sex positive as long as you don't objectify.
hmm yeah i've a bit of trouble with the whole concept of "objectifying" because what does that really mean?
in my view, people are always both objects and subjects at the same time. it's like people have a body and a mind at the same time, because only having 1 of the 2 would be pointless.
I think you might be taking the term a bit too literally. When people say objectifying, they don’t mean acknowledging or sexualizing their body. They mean reducing a person to just their body or sexual function, as if their mind, feelings, and autonomy don’t matter.
It’s when the body is treated as all there is. Think of the 1950s and '60s, women were often seen as existing primarily for reproduction or male pleasure, not as full people with their own goals, thoughts, or boundaries.
Sex positivity, by contrast, says: bodies are great, sex is great, but the other person remains a subject, someone with consent, desires, and dignity of their own. You can appreciate the body without erasing the person.
huh i think that's a good explanation actually. i've had similar thoughts myself but didn't have the words for it so i called it "sexism II" (which you call "sex positivity") to differentiate it from "sexism I" (sexism). It might be silly but i didn't know how else to express myself.
I also think that it's noteworthy that the "reduction to a function" is something that happened to basically everyone in 1960, not just to women. Men were just as much "reduced" to being the "breadwinner", which is a function as well. I think that's not talked about as much because men don't tend to talk about "being reduced to a function" as much. Some kind of "society forbids to complain" or sth.