this post was submitted on 16 May 2026
65 points (95.8% liked)

196

6267 readers
2250 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

If you want a small digital camera separate from your phone, it's probably fine. The problem is that mid range phone cameras have comparable quality, so most people are better off spending £40 more on their next phone than buying a £40 camera. As a result of this reality, these sort of cameras aren't in high demand, and don't have many options available.

If I wanted a camera separate from my phone, I'd probably save up for a DLSR or film camera, as I'd get better pictures and more out of the experience. However, if you absolutely must have this type of camera, I won't stop you.

[–] Kasane_Teto@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

tbh, digicams have been getting kinda big on tiktok because of the 2000’s quality people wanna capture (as it’s more æsthetiqué), but you’re right about the more niche ones that aren’t sony cybershot or that one samsung one with the flippy screen (for selfies)

[–] Arkhive@piefed.blahaj.zone 17 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Good? No idea. Necessary? Most definitely.

Call it gender affirmation. It’s medically necessary. Bill it to your insurance or something.

[–] Kasane_Teto@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 days ago

your telling me the NHS will cover it?

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

will cost probably a lot more but if you find a good deal on a superzoom camera those are neat because at the max zoom range you can get some shots that not many other cameras can take (and certainly not phones)

I got a used sx60 hs for like $200 a couple years ago, compared to my phone (oneplus 12) it's decent at macro, great at high zoom, but worse at basically anything else. of course if you want that look then it's good for that too lol.

Also keep in mind that those all have pretty small sensor sizes (actually apparently the sx60 hs has exactly the same sensor size as this camera) so you need the area to be pretty bright for max zoom to be usable, and fast subjects are pretty hard.

curated photo dump:

TV

captive birds

wild birds (i really don't know why that hawk let us get so close to it...)

full zoom

macro (it can actually focus on the lens, if you ever want to do that)

top of the london eye

random helicopter

can get some nice bokeh

full zoom range across the thames

[–] Kasane_Teto@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

doesn’t have that 2000’s aesthetic quality, it’s giving more 2010, sorry hard pass

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Well yea, this one came out in 2014

Probably would look relatively similar to this camera when using a regular amount of zoom?

I'm sure there are a lot of earlier ones as well tho

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

If you want a new one, a Kodak AstroZoom might be the shit superzoom camera you're looking for. Not very light-sensitive, zero connectivity except MicroUSB for charging (thankfully, can be used while charging) and card reader mode, 20 MP but as sharp as 2 MP at 42x optical zoom. No real video or audio codecs (MJPEG at 1080p30 with companded PCM audio, at a bitrate that would only make sense at H.264/H.265 and yet struggling with some Class-10/UHS-I cards). Buggy firmware (timelapse options are 10, 30, 60 and the default -16384 s, no EV control in Auto mode, macro and burst always disabled after restart), slow autofocus that can only be locked by holding the shutter halfway down throughout the video, sensor from a midrange phone, and processor comparable to 2008 models. Only 5 full-res shots per second (or 30 in 1080p or 120 in VGA, mirroring its video "capabilities", no 25, 24 or 23.976 support). Bonus, it's neither compact nor upgradable with a better lens so worse of both worlds.

I mean, I have a basic 2013 compact that would beat it in everything but apparent cred, quality at 20x+ zoom, mode selection and the ability to be used while charging (without a DIY solution) if it didn't have age-related problems like worn battery and dust in lens. It can even be remotely controlled over Wi-Fi, impressive for the time!

[–] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

My mom probably still has the amazing Polaroid digicam that I bought on clearance around 99. It could store, like, 20 VGA images on the internal storage. It took around 5 seconds to capture an image that looked like it had been forgotten at the bottom of a half eaten bowl of ramen.

[–] Kasane_Teto@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

polaroid digicam? so it stores them and prints them out for ya?

[–] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

That would have been amazing, but no. In the late 90s/early 00s Polaroid was struggling and slapped their name on a bunch of shit products. Still kinda does.

It's weird to think that 1 Hour Photo processing pretty much killed the instant camera, then digital killed 90 percent of actual film processing. Every once in a while somebody comes out with a pocket sized digital printer that can turn your phone into a convoluted Instax, but they are always shit quality or one of the consumables required for the process cost way too much.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 days ago

Not a rip off, but if you have any second hand/thrift shops near you I think it wouldn't be too hard to find something like this for <10£. If it turns on, takes a pic, and is not visibility broken it's good, they don't really degrade usually (until they die completely)

[–] Gormadt@slrpnk.net 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

If you plan to use it and you can afford it, sure go for it.

Use it and keep it out of a landfill

Just don't forget to have fun with it!

EDIT: Also I'm not sure what kind of batteries it has but be aware that the older it is the more likely those batteries are to be difficult to find but also more likely to be not great condition from hello. Unless it takes some kind of disposable battery, in which case you're likely fine. Or if you have the confidence AND skills to make a new battery for it if need be.

[–] Kasane_Teto@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I selected AA in the search filter

[–] Gormadt@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 days ago

That'll help, just be sure to pull the batteries out often. Especially if storing it. It's a nightmare cleaning the corrosion out if they get forgotten for awhile. I've had to do it twice... on the same camera... sometimes it takes a few tries to learn a lesson lol