this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
59 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29890 readers
3010 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago

Please be true because it would be extremely funny.

Here's how I want it to look

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 2 points 2 hours ago

isn't that illegal? They're going to have to change the law first--or just break it.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 32 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

So I guess they're prepping for that hyper-inflation now. Can't wait for a cup of coffee to cost $75 and a month's rent to be $20,000. But hey, look on the bright side, I'm sure the stock market will look amazing breaking through all those all time records.

Speaking of, that would be an interesting exercise. They always talk about how various funds and stocks are up or down some percent over the previous day/week/year or whatever. It would be interesting to see that same data but adjusted for inflation. Like is the dow jones up 2% from last year or is it really down 0.5% due to inflation?

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Average rent today is approximately 1750, it was about 175 in 1976. So if inflation continues at the same rate, in 50 years rent will be about 17.5k a month.

[–] pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.works 15 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

But the minimum wage will of course remain unchanged.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Untrue. They'll find some excuse to lower it. "See! Minimum wage increases make inflation go up! The ONLY way to fix it is to lower the minimum wage!"

[–] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I wish. They'll just look to abolish minimum wage entirely. "The free market will enforce a true minimum wage on its own without the need for pesky government interference. If you own your own business and you understand what you're employees' labor is worth, then you and you alone should be deciding what to pay your employees. If it's too low for them to accept, then they will go elsewhere, and somebody who is willing to work for you at that wage will fill the job."

They will proclaim that your protections are actually chains, and 1/3 of the country will cheer for the "chains" to be removed. Freedom! America! Yay fascism!

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 hours ago

We just need a maximum wage on the books. Complete compensation package maximum

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 19 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

Here's a link to a news station not run by a fascist enabler

https://www.wavy.com/news/politics/trump-250-bill-proposal-sparks-backlash/

The reported push by Trump administration officials comes despite the 1866 Thayer Amendment, which makes it illegal to put the likeness of a living person on official U.S. currency, bonds or other financial notes. Additionally, current law limits U.S. currency to specific denominations and a $250 bill is not on that list.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 hours ago

But you can try to get the law changed.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

Additionally, current law limits U.S. currency to specific denominations and a $250 bill is not on that list.

At least "we can't take X off the $Y bill" is probably an argument effective on the stupids who want Trump on something. They'd probably only want FDR off the dime, and Trump would never want to be on something so small.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Isn’t that the NBC affiliate that’s partnered with a yacht rock radio station?

[–] alexc@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This sounds like a lot of money for toilet paper…

[–] Ceruleum@lemmy.wtf 2 points 2 hours ago

But who doesn't want to wipe his ass on the Drumpf?

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

Usable for a loaf of bread.