this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2026
258 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

11278 readers
1184 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The European Parliament will this week replace Google with France’s Qwant – a European alternative search engine – as the default on its computers, according to an email seen by Euractiv.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tirateimas@lemmy.pt 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes. Next step, public and essential services must work through a website and not require mobile apps that are only available on Google and Apple app stores. This will ensure a level playing field for new competitors. Otherwise, they already lost before even starting.

[–] voodoocode@feddit.org 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Next next step These Services must offer Public APIs for third Party Provider to Connect. Imagine a Europe wide train booking Site or similar

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 36 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I've been using Qwant a decent amount lately and it's definitely better than current day Google. Kagi is also good.

[–] HowRu68@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Never tried Qwant, how does it compare to Ecosia or DDG?

[–] timestatic@feddit.org 10 points 3 days ago

Qwant and Ecosia both work together for the european search index. I think when data is missing also both use bing results in a private manner to substitute entries. For the most part Qwant is quite good imo

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Never tried Ecosia but I would say it's better than DDG. Kagi is probably the best though.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 6 points 3 days ago

I personally switched over to Qwant from Ecosia and have found it to be more consistent. Can't comment on DDG so much

[–] volkerwirsing@feddit.org 27 points 3 days ago

Just think about how much Google being the default search engine for the EU parliament enabled the USA to spy on the parliament. Everything some MEP searches is going through some NSA data center. And try to imagine how much information the USA can get from that

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

Tech bros. entering the find out stage.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

We were talking about this at lunch today at work, that Qwant is better than Google because Google evil, and Ecosia's search results are garbage. So several of my colleagues have switched to Qwant. I guess I'll follow suit. Not sure what to gain from moving from DuckDuckGo though. Qwant has its own index maybe?

[–] Meridula@europe.pub 11 points 3 days ago

Qwant and ecosia are working on their own index which they both draw on, though at least ecosia not completely yet

[–] aloofPenguin@piefed.world 6 points 3 days ago

I have heard that they are developing that, but don't know how much progress there is on it.

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

DDG is still US tech though. If the goal is to use European, DDG is a no-go.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Speaking of US tech, Qwant has Amazon and Adidas as sponsors? πŸ’€ They are prominently displayed on the Qwant front page when using its mobile app...

[–] Nurgus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Take their money, abandon their tech. I've been boycotting Amazon for years and I don't see a problem.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

It's easy for us to say when we never even use the services or products of those companies.

What if it said "Support Genocide" instead. Still, take their money, abandon their cause? It feels very uneasy. No search engine is free, just as no tech offering is truly free.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Absolutely right, I am trying to move away from US tech.

What I absolutely can't love without is bangs. Like !w to search Wikipedia directly, for example.

But I'm starting to think I might want an add-on for this instead of relying on the search engine for it.

[–] abc@suppo.fi 6 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Qwant replied 403 to all my requests for like 4 days in a row. Seems to work now for some reason.

Went to duckduckgo. I wish Proton had a search engine.

[–] EatingOnions@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Ecosia.org works well at least for me, and they also plant trees every 40 searches or something like that, you can get collectables as well

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

I wish Proton had a search engine.

Guess they are going for the low-hanging fruit first.

[–] timestatic@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

Yeah some days Qwant is a bit unreliable, although for me its at most was a few hours. Qwant is my default but I also have other search engines bound in firefox inspired by DDG Bangs (for example !ddg for searching on DuckDuckGo)

[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ultimately we need certain internet infrastructure as free public utilities. Like a search engine backend.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

free public utilities

I agree, but this will require political will. I think on lemmy people would vote for a government that creates stuff like this, but there are a lot of people want their government to spend as little as possible, unfortunately. I find it more likely we end up with a non-profit like wikipedia provides basic knowledge to the public, free of charge.

[–] EatingOnions@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Things moving forward, slowly but surely

[–] jlow@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Partly owned by German nazi media house Springer:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qwant

Personally I pay for https://metager.org/ , they don't have their own index (something the EU with their open index will hopefully solve in the future) but apart from their image search being completely shite I have no complaints.

[–] timestatic@feddit.org 8 points 3 days ago

Springer is right wing but I think its a bit much to call them Nazi. Also 20% ownership doesn't mean they run the company

[–] Crazazy@feddit.nl 1 points 2 days ago

I'm not sure which open index the EU is planning on using but I sure hope it's not the Open Web Index because when I last had to use that it turns out that they forgot to embed the links that were contained in the texts they scanned

As for why that's bad: hyperlinks are basically THE best way to figure out which content is relevant compared to other content. PageRank, the algorithm that got Google famous, is based on articles linking to each other to figure out which articles are the most valuable (it's the articles that the most people link to, similar to how in science, the most important papers are usually the ones with the most citations). Open Web Index doesn't have any of that information, it's all just text, combined with the link where the crawler scanned that text