this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
155 points (98.1% liked)

Showerthoughts

42412 readers
623 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 79 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Probably not, thanks to their nictitating membrane (or haw).

It's an extra see-through eyelid that keeps dust and debris out of their eyes.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 19 points 4 days ago (2 children)

So they are related to Vulcans? /s

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago

Clearly. Where do you think they got those ears from?

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago

And here I was thinking they must be amphibians.

[–] RabbitMix@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 days ago

Oh so like birds? That's cool!

[–] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

Haaaaaw yeeeaaaahhhhh!

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 34 points 4 days ago (2 children)

My front of my car used to get covered in bugs years ago, but not these days. Not a good sign.

But the OP’s shower thought made me chuckle! It’s something I’ve never thought about before.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Insect populations have halved in the last ten years

[–] gilokee@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

if only that happened specifically to mosquitos. blegh.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Cars are more aerodynamic, compounding the reduction in splatters caused by reduced populations. I can tell you my motorcycle helmet, little windscreen, and blunt nose catche a ton more bugs than my cars, which aren't even all that swoopy by modern standards. A splatted beetle or moth take up a critical amount of viewing space on a helmet, very noticeable

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The research included vintage cars up to 70 years old to see if their less aerodynamic shape meant they killed more bugs, but it found that modern cars actually hit slightly more insects.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/feb/12/car-splatometer-tests-reveal-huge-decline-number-insects

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windshield_phenomenon

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

No doubt, there's a huge population decline. I didn't mean to detract from that. However, the primary splatometer for drivers is the windshield, not the license plate. The test put the splatometer on the license plate, which is a very reasonable place when employing the public as volunteer testers. So yes, older vehicles' license plates may catch slightly more bugs, but there's still a major difference in windscreen shape and upper aerodynamics.

If you look at, say, 2018+ vehicles, I'd say basically every reasonable passenger vehicle will have a subtle lower air splitter, a sharp protrusion at the lower edge of the bumper. This is meant to slice the air relatively cleanly to prevent bumper-level air from going under the car, instead going around and over. However, around 2018, upper splitters began appearing at the top of the bumper as well, in the form of sharp hood rims or grille features. The intent is to prevent air from going over, hitting the windscreen, and adding to the volume over the roof and upper wake, instead sending it to the sides where it finds a car's length of smooth side paneling. The 2018 Accord and 2016 Civic comes to mind, both a redesign that slanted the chrome grille bar above the logo forward. I'm not saying that every vehicle in the 2019 study was a 2018+ Accord and 2016+ Civic, just an example of ever-changing aerodynamic practices. One (or two) splitters will make the air more forceful on the bumper while greatly smoothing the total vehicle's airflow. Dial it back to 90s Fords, and the lower bumper was often rounded under the car in their bubble era. That works for airplane design, but is a negative feature on a grounded vehicle.

Unfortunately, there's no easy way to get a true splatometer measurement. You'd need, say, a license plate on stilts, vaulted 5ft in front of the vehicle to be outside the vehicle's aerodynamic influence. I suppose a net would also work and we don't actually need splats to count.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Story time: once upon a time, back when I was much, much cooler than I am now, I used to ride a motorcycle. I had this bad habit of riding with the visor up and no sunglasses. That is, until one day, a bug got stuck in my eyelid. I had to ride for 30 minutes like that before I got home and was able to wash out my eyeball.

Moral of the story: eye protection! Always eye protection!

[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 9 points 4 days ago

Even with my visor down with a full face mask I had it happen once. I guess it came in through the neck somehow? I also had that fucker in my eyeball for like 30-40 minutes before I got to a gas station

[–] Forester@pawb.social 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I had a mosquito impale itself into my eye while riding a bike probably going 30ish. Horrible experience. It was thrashing and flapping. It had flown right in to me with the pointy side. Had to pull it out.

[–] dangercake@feddit.uk 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So I heard of this thing where you have an inability to voluntarily visualize mental images. Wondering where I can buy one aphantasia please.

[–] Forester@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago

I can answer this. It involves sudden unplanned severe head trauma at a young formative age

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I once accidentally ate a June bug while on my bicycle.

Im wondering how often this sort of thing happens to animals who move fast.

I also now never mouth breathe on my bike. Regardless if I'm winded or not. No more June bugs for me, thanks.

[–] MouldyCat@feddit.uk 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If you're exerting yourself at all, you pretty much have to mouth breathe. The way I avoid gobbling up any flying insects is to keep my head down while breathing in. It's surprisingly effective.

Slightly related, my son once had a bee go up his nose while we were out cycling. I say only slightly related because he wasn't actually going that fast; he was only about 8. He stopped suddenly, complaining about something going up his nose. Neither of us realised what had actually happened until he coughed up a still-squirming bee in a pool of phlegm.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

That's a nasty story but thanks for sharing. Glad he didn't get stung in the sinuses. I can't imagine how much that would have hurt.

Hopefully our stories help people understand the risk of bugs when biking.

Yeah if I get super winded I do like a very small mouth opening. But mostly try to keep that closed.

I also, luckily, wear big glasses and have had quite a few bugs smack against them.

I don't know what the solution is since wearing a face shield is super hot and can fog up.

[–] WhatISawInTheForest@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Like, you actually ATE the june bug?! Daaamn!!! Yuuuuuck!

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

It just came in and right to the back and reflex kicked in and down it went.

This happened when I was a teenager and the horror of it all still haunts me to this day.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 16 points 4 days ago

🫪

Oh no! Bugs!

😑

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

it is also worth pointing out because we are thinking of the car comparison... but cheetah's only spend a very brief time anywhere close to their top speed (usually under 30 seconds). A cheetah attack is over one way or the other in seconds, and a cheetah would almost die of heat stroke if it sprinted for a full minute.

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

IIRC one of the big evolutionary advantages of Homo Sapiens as a predator at least was stamina - or our ability to run for comparatively long periods of time.

[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago

Sweat, baby. The deadly weapon we use to hunt other animals via exhaustion.

[–] MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] idealotus@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

It ain't easy being cheesy.

[–] Squatcher@piefed.social 5 points 4 days ago

They actually love it

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Imma need a big grant to find out. Really big. Like, Summer House big.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Maybe that's why they don't smile a lot.