this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
273 points (98.2% liked)

News

37929 readers
3083 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) wants to make it effectively impossible for people to buy what many call burner phones—a phone not explicitly linked to your identity at the point of purchase—which would impact privacy-conscious people, to domestic abuse survivors, to journalists, and many more. The FCC plans to do this by legally forcing the country’s telecoms to store a wealth of personal information about essentially all phone customers, including a government issued identification number and their physical address, alarming privacy advocates and civil rights activists who compare the measures to those from authoritarian countries where it can be difficult to buy a mobile phone plan without giving up your identity.

The proposed change would drastically shake up how people obtain phone plans in the U.S., and have all sorts of privacy and cybersecurity knock-on effects. The FCC is proposing the data collection partly as a way to combat scammers, with telecoms being required to collect other information on business and foreign customers like the intended use case of their bulk phone plan purchase and their IP address. But the changes would mean telecoms collect data on all new and renewing customers, and the FCC provides a long list of other things that the collected data could help authorities with.

“For decades, civil libertarians have looked overseas at authoritarian countries where the government requires people to register to get a mobile phone to ensure they can be tracked. We never thought that would happen here,” Jay Stanley, senior policy analyst at the American Civil Liberties Union’s (ACLU) Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project told 404 Media in an email. “But make no mistake: with this rulemaking, the government is contemplating taking away people’s ability to get a burner phone, which will hurt low-income people, domestic violence victims, and anyone else who cares about their privacy.”

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] folekaule@lemmy.world 95 points 2 days ago (4 children)

This is just going to mean more phone theft and phone sales going underground. This hurts regular privacy conscious people and changes nothing for criminals.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah.

Need a burner phone? But a used one with a fake name on eBay.

SMS and phone calls are basically dead anyways, I can easily spin up an encrypted service anyways, and run it off public wifi networks.

[–] LuminousLuddite@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Ebay soon: "Please upload a selfie and your ID to verify your identity before buying this restricted item".

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

By year end I wouldn’t be surprised if they needed a scan of the interior of my colon.

We live in hell.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 22 points 1 day ago

yeah and won't effect scammers at all who will use foreign purchasers of the numbers or bury them in shell companies.

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 5 points 1 day ago

I suspect it would also correlate with a dramatic rise in the popularity of mesh networking.

[–] alapakala@quokk.au 0 points 1 day ago
[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How about just start with shutting down phone number spoofing. Thanks.

[–] Dionysus@leminal.space 10 points 1 day ago

But that world hurt the free market!

--Some repugnant republican somewhere

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 52 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Control vehicle operability and thus mobility.
Control use of electronic devices, and thus It's empowerment.
Observe all behavior, external and internal, to know and predict behavior.
Remove privacy and anonymity, to target individuals.
Track relationships, to know all associations and idea propagation.
View all 3d printed designs, to steal concepts and monitor use.
Eliminate wealth and ownership, to disempower the masses.

All of this is happening right now. What kind of society does this sound like?

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago

Only if you're poor!

[–] underThunder@thelemmy.club 22 points 1 day ago

Just sounds like more surveillance to me.

[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Oh my, another dystopian fucking thing happening. And its only the 8000th one this week!

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The FCC is proposing the data collection partly as a way to combat scammers

Lol, that'll never happen, it's just part of the domestic surveillance network.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 1 day ago

Had my google phone stolen internationally. Called google about it and they said "we can't do anything to brick your phone." I have an old pixel 6a that ws bricked due to the battery and a security patch they pushed.

Funny how things only work in their favor.

[–] meowcar42O@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Kill burner phones" makes it sound like the only people who don't want to sign up for their phone plan using their id are criminals

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly. The authoritarian retort will be "oH? wHaT dO yOu HaVe To HiDe? HmMmmmM?"

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

It's the same on every topic. If for the kids doesn't work, play criminal card. If that doesn't work try the national security or terrorism card.

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 35 points 1 day ago

Well that should make it easy to identify and shut down/block the call spam farms.

What's that? They don't give a flying fuck about it? Huh, neat.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Anyone feel like all this surveillance is leading up to something?

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sounds like a ridiculous crackdown on privacy that will do abso-fucking-lutely nothing to actually stop spammers, grifters, or other criminals.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 2 days ago

With all of the other privacy related crackdowns that have been popular recently, I just assumed that the government already figured out an easy way to identify burner phone users. It's surprising that it took them this long if that's not the case.

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I am seriously ready to ditch my phone all together and just have a land line.

I am required to use the phone my employer provides me and on my days off it is off too and in my desk.

[–] iThinkDifferentThanU@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

thought they were already doin this? where does one find a burner phone?

[–] jimonthony@lemmy.zip 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I think you can still but prepaid phones at department/electronics stores. Not everyone needs or wants a monthly bill.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

tracfone you just buy the phone and cards and you apply the cards to the phone number. never have to put any personal information.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Where is this? Because Tracphone is Verizon, now, and even under Carlos Slim, required name and address in the USA.

[–] lyrial@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Walmart under the brand name Straight Talk. I believe they are owned by (or at least get their phones from) Tracphone.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's all Verizon, now. Iirc, Mint is T-Mobile, Sprint is T-Mobile...we have no not-evil options.

ETA: and it was hella evil under Slim.

[–] lyrial@anarchist.nexus 1 points 1 day ago

They may own it, buy I don't know how it would shaje out. I use straight talk, because sometimes things get bad and I can pay $10 for a week of service, which is better than nothing in a pinch. This would risk their customer base leaving since a large part of the appeal is being no contract, but if the FCC is going to force them to stop the ability to pay in cash, I may go back to VOIP only.

[–] despoticruin@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Mint you just put in a zip code and a name that's totally real I promise and that's it.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

At least in my experience you can't activate or put time on the prepaid without creating an account, which requires your details. But perhaps that's just the big players.

[–] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Seems like Google Voice plus public wifi would still allow one to make calls/text without any id associated with it.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

doesn't google voice require another phone number to register?

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 5 points 1 day ago

Plus it's Google. They already know everything about everyone.

[–] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Oh you're correct I think. It's been a while since I set it up.

Jmp.chat works great and isn't run by fascist toadies. :)