this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
1051 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

85376 readers
4362 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gemakey@lemmy.world 30 points 13 hours ago

The time has come to drag these people from their posts.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

Not surprised and the MAGA fuck nuts will continue to vote for the bastard.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 88 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

This guy is gonna get himself shot by angry residents. I've never been to a county meeting before in my life, but I can't imagine just telling people to fuck off when they come to voice their opposition to issues in their town/city.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 45 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

Aw, shooting him is too easy. There's lots more to do before that.

Does he own a business on main street? Be a shame if his big plate glass window got broke. Then got broke again. And again...

His tires keep getting leaks, because nails keep showing up in his driveway. His car keeps getting keyed. Somebody turned the hose on at his house, and it ran for three days, flooding his backyard, and running his bill up a couple of hundred dollars. Somebody poured gasoline on his lawn spelling "FLOCK?" Rumors have been spreading about extramarital affairs, his AND his wife's. Online reviews for his business have cratered.

Maybe he'll feel like talking at the next county meeting.

If not, maybe things start to burn.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

The problem is that he could then use all of this to justify more surveillance, not less. Especially if any of the attackers get caught because of a Flock camera. It will just cause a feedback loop where a camera helped arrest someone, so we obviously need more cameras, which causes more anger, which causes more attacks, which causes more cameras… You get the idea.

I’m not saying that more cameras are the correct reaction, but I am saying that is likely how someone who is in Flock’s pocket would think about the situation. Especially when a Flock sales rep is whispering “this crime could have been solved if there was a camera on that street corner” into their ear like a little shoulder-devil.

[–] replicat@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago

The idea is that flock cameras eliminate these threats. They don't. But that's the idea.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago
[–] oozynozh@sh.itjust.works 29 points 21 hours ago

ironically all of these things would be used as justification for more surveillance

[–] voldage@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

I can imagine other politicians shaking in fear and rethinking their despotic policies because their counterpart met a miserable end of somebody keying their car. Well, I say "somebody", but they exactly know who, because of the flock cameras. But even if they catch this one, there will be MILLIONS behind them, with their keys ready to make their foes suffer through mild to severe annoyance.

I guess they will retailate with something DUMB and ineffective like killing us all in the concentration camps. Amateurs.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 39 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

They need to be reminded that The People ARE the government. It’s ours. All of this belongs to us.

[–] tristynalxander@mander.xyz 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Neither the United States, nor any constituent states, nor any of their constituent counties (to my knowledge) qualify as electoral democracies. I'm aware of no election system [that's currently in use] meeting the condorcet criterion and providing a None/Lottery option. [This how the government was set up.]

You cannot claim consent of the governed if the governed cannot say no.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 31 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Jeezus pleezus. Even county commissioners think they have autocratic, dictatorial powers. It amazes me how little power given can lead immediately to corruption. How do we get a new generation of morally righteous, benevolent, empathic people to run for government in the midst of all this dark nonsense?

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 6 points 13 hours ago

Increase the pay for most political positions. Start or donate to collectives or non-profits that fund candidates to run.

There are tons of nice milennial folk who are more than ready to step into these roles but like most people, don't have the cash to risk running and take care of their families. We need more organizations scouting for people who might be interested and funding their lifestyle while they run. Networks were maybe even if they lose, they know they will at least have a job after in the political infrastructure.

I want to see more family people holding office, not grindmaxxers who are trying to get ahead in life with their political aspirations.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 8 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

It is also due to these lower end governments getting used to no one showing up for any of their meetings. Normally the only people that will show up are the local wingnuts, so they treat everyone as one.

I am in small town government and this happened right in front of me. Even valid issues are treated with the same contempt as the lady that wants us (the town counsel) to "do something" about those damn chem trails.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Make autism mandatory to hold public office.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

You've never seen someone with autism power-trip?

elon musk has autism.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Yeah, autism goes both ways. Some get the “justice sensitivity leads to outspoken egalitarianism” kind, while others get the “everyone should just do what I say, exactly how I say, I won’t hear any arguments against it” kind.

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

I've never heard anyone but himself make that claim this one time about asperger's. I don't know why anyone would believe that.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 70 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Funny thing about American voting: for all the ways that people insist voting doesn't matter, the one place in America where one vote travels the absolute farthest is in a small town election, and right next to that are county elections, for positions like these.

County sheriffs are often elected, as are county commissioners; who gets elected and who gets appointed depends entirely on applicable state and local law. But even if both of these positions are appointed in Madison County, North Carolina, where this debacle took place, the appointer will almost always be an elected official, like a mayor.

In other words, there is in fact a place where the buck stops in local politics, whether it's with the mayor or the commissioner or the sheriff or all of the above, and everyone who lives there already knows exactly where it does, especially in a back wood county in the hills like this one.

Add the fact that the meeting was already full of angry people, people who cared enough about the whole thing to make the drive into the county seat and attend, only to be shut up once they arrived.

So while they were silenced at this meeting, it's not over. None of them want Flock cameras, and nobody wants to take the time and trouble to come to a goddamn podunk county commission meeting only to be told to shut up and sit down.

Come election season, any neighbors with short memories will absolutely be reminded of this, in the kind of local election where often every single vote counts.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

I'll also add, local government is a part time job unless you're mayor of a large city. These are ordinary people who can be forced to be subjected to the judgement and distaste of their neighbors.

You can put up signs about their bad behavior in office. You can refuse them service in your store. You can't do shit to the president or your representative in congress, but by fuck can you make a city councilor rue the day they ran for office

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago

Yeah, this guy just guaranteed many full meetings instead of just the one.

[–] Clutter@sh.itjust.works 8 points 19 hours ago

Then everyone gets up and leaves. And next time vote blue.

[–] ContactClosure@lemmus.org 10 points 20 hours ago

Asheville let some people speak before they greenlighted an Axon contract that they hadnt even seen yet. Voted for it as if Axon had their family tied up in an undisclosed location. It was very weird.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 272 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Will they remember this the next time he's up for reelection?

[–] NinePeedles@sh.itjust.works 212 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Voters have a depressingly short memory.

[–] cattywampus@lemmy.world 61 points 1 day ago (10 children)

That's why democracy is also known as being ruled by the hordes of idiots. It's amazing when people are well informed on what they are voting on, the problem is that's never happened in mass and never will. People will vote based on their feelings or just straight up not at all.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The article quotes a Madison County privacy org directly:

“The Sheriff Office claims they are only using this technology for serious crimes, yet published audit logs tell a different story,” a website called Madison for Privacy says. “Madison County has searched the nationwide database over 1,200 times over just a 60 day period. In a county over only 20,000 residents, its hard to understand what could warrant this many searches.”

Holy shit, they're not wrong. Follow that haveibeenflocked.com link to the Madison County sheriff's office Flock searches, and the accompanying note:

These are some of the searches performed by Madison County NC SO. We have seen a total of 1,216 searches for this agency, performed by 1 person over 62 days between 3/11/2026 and 5/11/2026 (1 user was active in the most recent six months) The most recent import of records for this agency happened on 5/17/2026.

Madison County is southwest of Asheville on the state line between NC and TN, comprised mostly of unincorporated communities, which is a polite way of saying most residents live in the hills, not in the towns. The entire county has a population of roughly 21,000, and the largest town, Mars Hill, has only 2,000 residents. It doesn't get much more rural than this on the East Coast.

So given the population and its distribution, and the fact that the sheriff's office only serves the unincorporated communities because the three towns have their own municipal police, where the fuck does the sheriff's office get cause or even time for what averages out to 600 Flock searches in a month?

But it gets even stranger. I clicked on a few searches, just to see what I could see, and every single one I clicked on with an unredacted reason* was associated with the same two or three other non-local police departments as the source of the information retrieved, two of which were the exact same ones every time: Forest Park Ohio PD, Tifton Georgia PD, and occasionally the Douglas County Nevada SO. There were a couple others, but always at least one of those three. (If you go to the little i next to the other PDs, it tells you, "This audit record appears in [n] different public record files.")

This is true whether I clicked on a homicide, a non-DUI alcohol inquiry, a burglary, a car theft, or a sex offense. No matter what reason I chose, no matter how disparate the crime or the date, one if not all of those three law enforcement agencies came up as the source of the Flock information that inquiry pulled from. And this is the same of every search I clicked on, over and over and over again.

(*The sole exceptions to all this were where the crime itself was redacted, and then the associated source of information was Buncombe County, NC, which neighbors Madison County and could potentially be a valid law enforcement reason to search Flock data.)

And when I selected the Repeat Searches checkbox at the top, defined as "Display filter that hides likely duplicate searches (identical searches within 5 minutes). Does not affect server-side counts or downloads," an even 800 of those 1,216 searches get loaded. So fully two thirds of those searches across two months qualify as duplicates executed within five minutes of each other, to Flock parameters at least. (Or maybe one third, if I'm understanding it wrong; I'm sure someone will be along to correct me shortly.) But that's still a fuckton of duplicates executed within five minutes of each other.

I'll be the first to admit that I don't understand how it all works on the Flock side, but it almost seems like someone in the Madison County, NC sheriff's office is just sitting on their ass keeping serious tabs on a short list of people living in other places.

[–] optimisticturtle@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

it almost seems like someone in the Madison County, NC sheriff’s office is just sitting on their ass keeping serious tabs on a short list of people living in other places.

Probably exes and/or children as Flock abusers keep getting in trouble for.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

30 cities have banned flock. I hope the county bans these commissioners. It can be done.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You want to know what's wrong with America? We're pussies now.

That traitor -- and he surely is a fucking treason-weasel -- should not have been able to safely walk out of that meeting after telling the community that they didn't have the god-given right to address their elected officials.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Babalugats@feddit.uk 130 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"You will not speak on Flock tonight,” he responds. “One person designated. You can pick that person … if I gave everyone three minutes to say the same thing, which is opposition to Flock, we’d never get done … I’ve spoken. I’m not debating this."

Only politicians can be that arrogant. imagine forgetting how the fuck you got into that seat in the first place. Ironically, it's the same reason that he thinks that one person can speak on behalf of everyone else.

Voting for somebody to make your decisions for you is crazy. But expecting that same person to agree with everything that you want is just insane.

Even with that in mind, arrogant pricks like this guy still seem to be able to berate their constituents and remain confident that they will get re-elected.

[–] geekwithsoul@piefed.social 62 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Only politicians can be that arrogant.

Have you never heard C-suite and/or millionaires talk? They all sound like that - that's what unearned power sounds like.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hinterwalder@feddit.org 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A city council in the U.S. does not have to allow a general public comment time. Perhaps there are some states where it is required.

They can also allow public comment only as part of a hearing on a specific matter. Most states require this.

HOWEVER, if they allow an open public comment they cannot censor it.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There are definitely states where it's required. Washington is one, for example. I was too lazy to research more.

But anyway, the details matter. One can easily have public comment but still limit the undesirable speech, as this specific example shows... Is that legal? Depends if you have a good lawyer.

[–] Hinterwalder@feddit.org 12 points 1 day ago

I have experience in this. The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled on it. If it’s open comment time, they cannot censor except for obscene or threatening speech. All they can do is set a time limit. Don’t cuss or make violent threats and you’re good. If they censor you it’s an open and shut civil rights case.

If it’s a public hearing for a specific matter, they can restrict comment to that topic.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

Seems like an opportunity for malicious compliance …. Perhaps everyone can speak up against stifling public input “on matters like F*ck cameras”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Great, maybe you should start refusing to let these pieces of shit feel safe in public.

No? Not willing to do that? Fine, zero sympathy- you deserve whatever they give you.

Could not be sicker of Americans whining about how victimized they are. This is on you. Yes, I'm victim-blaming, you fucking cowards. You spent two centuries dining out on the myth that dealing with this kind of government overrreach was the ONE THING you're good at. Go fuck yourselves, I could give two shits whether MAGA keeps steamrolling you at this point.

[–] Cease@mander.xyz 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Have you ever heard the phrase "The revolution will not be televised"?

Seems like you just want an excuse to blame americans for not doing enough when all you have is american news from whatever country you're from - but sure - keep holding that reductive belief

[–] Texas_Hangover@lemmy.radio 2 points 12 hours ago

Dudes whole post history is unhinged rants lol. Needs medication I reckon.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 21 hours ago

Yes, we will.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 67 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“If you want a special meeting, you go back to the 250 years that the sheriff has been the elected official in the state of North Carolina and you have that meeting with him. This board, we don’t own Flock cameras, I’ve emailed some of you this. We don’t pay for Flock cameras. We don’t operate Flock cameras. We have no interest in Flock camera or Flock camera discussion. That’s your elected sheriff. So if you want to have a meeting with the person that’s involved with that, then you’ll have a meeting with [him], not with us that’s a legislative body. We don’t control the sheriff’s budget. We give him X number of dollars, he does with it what he wishes. I’m not having this discussion. Either you select a person or not.”

One of the residents suggests that the board of commissioners could pass an ordinance about Flock cameras; he is cut off by Garrison, who says again that the residents can pick a person to speak or not. Eventually, the residents do select one representative, who was allowed to speak for seven minutes.

Later in the meeting, another resident explains that their public records requests for details about the Sheriff’s Office contracts and use of Flock have not been sufficiently responded to. She was allowed to speak because she was providing comment about her requests for public records, and not Flock specifically. “I’m here to talk about the lack of government transparency and accountability that I’ve seen come up with the Flock issue, starting with tonight. I think that it’s disgraceful the way you are refusing to let citizens speak to their elected officials,” she said. “We’ve repeatedly asked you to hold a public meeting for us to discuss this, so I’m very disappointed to see a lack of transparency.”

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (4 children)

We don’t control the sheriff’s budget. We give him X number of dollars, he does with it what he wishes.

Ok then, I'd like to open discussion about the sheriff's budget. Time to make some cuts.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 14 hours ago

that's kinda what the resident in my second quote did

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

so it would seem that even at the local level, civil SERVANTS are too big for their britches

[–] yggstyle@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I'm not saying you should.... but you could... use the cameras and other open sources ... darkweb and whatever else and just to utterly dox each and every one of these people promoting these products. These are not tech savvy people. They are old, decrepit, and well trained in responding only to a hearty handful of totally-not-a-bribe.

If you want these cunts to worry about security and rights... you need to make it personal.

Find an open flock cam? Live stream it with a projector where people see it. Collect some damning evidence and push it right in the face of the people who think it's secure.

My favorite discussion topic when someone starts with that protect the children bullshit:

You are totally right! But oh wait: with devices likely headed in the direction of being a beacon of 'my user is underage' ... doesn't that mean you can effectively, using publicly available information, play pokemon go... except with children?! After all with the leaks and cross references... they could probably just put a filter system in place and let you just find your match. Boy, girl, age, weight, build? I see you've made a selection! Care to cross reference with our live footage so you can find pick out that special place for the ideal get together? Need some AI help with finalizing your choice? Let's dress them up with a bit of help from our app developer GROK! ...Promise this is your child and youre just playing dress up to pick out that right gift? Alright! Here you go! Oh its actually your significant other and youre looking for something spicy... well ... why not! Heres a few more images with some fun playful outfits for the bedroom... we did you a favor and put them in a couple recommended positions we completely recommend. Go get em king! You're ready!

Usually by this point they've shut the hell up and are now contemplating how to put the genie back bottle. Feel free to use some creative flair. If they dont look like they are about to be ill - you clearly need to go harder.

Damn this seems dark. Just anybody could steal our children. And so easily! We should probably gps tag them at birth. We'll call it loli-jack. This way we'll never lose another kid. I'm sure that won't backfire... Hey and kids grow fast. Maybe some mandatory 3d scans of them during yearly checkups. Obviously so AI can track them if they are being trafficed. No way to disguise them then! Oh and then we can totally sell those totally anonomized scans to help with....

You'll feel positively disgusting if youre doing it right.

After care is important: the thing I recommend is washing yourself down with iso alcohol. Get a good scrub in. Then get that inner cleanse with a stiff shot and a good cry in the fetal position in the shower. Fuck I hate this timeline.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›