2 fucking months. They got him a gun and he lasted all of 2 months before going on a killing spree. There is zero chance in hell he went from normal and well adjusted to mass shooter in those 2 months. There had to have been lots of signs of mental health issues and they still GAVE HIM A FUCKING GUN
this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
193 points (98.5% liked)
News
23311 readers
5258 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
There were indeed signs. The school intervened and called the parents because he was having these homicidal ideations. The useless deadbeat parents' genius idea? Get him a gun to vent his anger. They proceed to go back to basically ignoring him and going to bars while leaving him home alone all day routinely. All the while the bullying he was subject to at school continued.
Yes. He specifically told them he was not okay mentally (admitted to hearing voices and having violent thoughts). They did nothing to get him help and instead bought him a gun.
If that is true then it makes me wonder if they were just hoping he'd kill himself. That's really dark and I'd love to think they were just negligent and not malicious.
Just on the practicalities of it alone shooting yourself with a pistol is easier.
There is zero chance in hell he went from normal and well adjusted to mass shooter in those 2 months.
Give that there were some other warning signs in this case I agree with you, but don't underestimate how quickly someone can go off the deep end
I've had a couple friends who've had some mental health issues that came on very suddenly with no warning. They didn't go out and hurt anyone, but from where they ended up it probably wasn't that big of a leap if their friends and family weren't on top of things trying to reel them in and get them help. I could definitely imagine them becoming a danger to themselves or others if they were left to their own devices for 2 months when it went down.
I have no pity for irresponsible parents that put guns in the hands of children. They are much more to blame than their own son, even if he was the one to pull the trigger.
They for sure own a lot of the blame but how exactly are they more responsible than the shooter? If that's not hyperbole then I think you're way off base. Enabling is never worse than the action itself in my opinion.
Ethan told his mother that he was having mental issues like hearing demon voices and having violent thoughts. They knew he had tortured animals. They bought him a gun and laughed about it when he got caught buying ammunition while at school. They were drunks who did not really give a shit and enabled someone who was very clearly not mentally well.
He has gotten mental help now that he is in prison and he regrets what he did and agrees with the sentencing. The bare minimum of mental health would have avoided this.
He was 15, most likely a victim of intense bullying or some other trauma. This doesn't excuse what he did but he needed help, not a gun.
I sometimes see people that commit shootings as people with heavy mental disorders and not outright evil as I would see a serial killer for instance. Obviously its very case per case and I'm making huge assumptions about the person.
Because they are the parents and raised him seen the signs refused to get him help and then gave him a gun. They created a monster and then gave a loaded weapon.
That's certainly not nothing but it's not the same as shooting up a school either. You don't have to say the two parties were equally bad in order to say they both did something wrong.
Enabling is always worse than the action itself.
Now I get that I'm a European and so my views on this are a little different than maybe the average American, but seriously what 15-year-old needs a semi automatic for their birthday?
Hell what 15-year-old needs a gun at all.
If I had a kid and they showed a genuine interest in guns, I'd surely start them off with something like a pistol, not go all the way up to military grade instantly.
semi-automatic doesn't equate to military grade. It is a pistol. it just has the feature that chambers a bullet as the shell is expelled.
A pistol is much more highly regulated than a semi-automatic rifle in almost every country, and for good reason: a pistol is a semi automatic weapon that's very easy to conceal.
Semi automatic means everytime you pull the trigger a bullet is fired. It's very standard for hunting and target shooting. A pistol itself is a semi automatic weapon and much easier to conceal.
There are definitely large aesthetic differences between a basic hunting rifle and "militarized" semi automatic weapons, but the actual mechanism and result are fundamentally identical. I'm not saying aesthetics don't matter though since it gives the gun a different "purpose".
Other than semi automatic you have "single action" which is when you pull the trigger to shoot, but then you have to physically move a mechanism to reset the gun before you can shoot again. Mostly common in shotguns and some rifles. There is also fully automatic which fires multiple rounds as long as you hold the trigger down.
Pistol would be a tricky choice too, easier to conceal, and more than most pistols are also semi automatic. Bolt action small caliber would be a decent start I'd say.
I agree with you, but the logic (if you could call it that at this point) is that long guns are for hunting whereas pistols are much more concealable. Of course they didn't feel the need to specify a difference between hunting rifles and 30-round semiauto so... Yeah. Murica I guess.
Just to be clear, nearly every (edit: modern) handgun you've ever seen, pistols included, is almost certainly a semi-automatic. I'm sure there are exceptions, but AFAIK, any (edit: modern) handgun that's not a revolver (or something weird like a derringer) is going to be semi-auto.
As someone who grew up around guns (but is not currently a gun owner), and if I planned to buy my child a gun prior to adulthood, I probably would start my kid with a BB gun at a younger age, then likely a revolver before going to semi-auto, but I wouldn't feel like either of those are choices that are the only safe ones. (If we've cleared the hurdle of considering a 15 year old owning a gun to be safe at all.)
Revolver:
I think this is great. Maybe if parents start getting charged for their kids shooting up schools, less kids will have access to guns.
I wonder how many school shooting are done by people underage.
They failed or outright set up their child. That child needs intensive therapy and love. We fail as a society.
Why did the boy shoot up his school in the first place?
The type of people who shoot up schools don't need good reasons. In this case it was because "the voices" told him to, which really tells you everything you need to know about the case.
Are you sure? The article alludes to him being bullied, and if that was his motivation, then the blame lies far more on the school and his bullies than even his shitty parents.
Now go ahead and get mad at me for stating such. Go ahead. That ought to be good for a laugh