this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
121 points (100.0% liked)

News

38105 readers
2628 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In another boost to Donald Trump’s unprecedented hardline crackdown on immigrants, including many who have lived legally in the US for years, the court issued a 6-3 ruling. That was powered ⁠by its conservative-leaning majority, overturning decisions by ⁠federal judges in New York and Washington DC that had halted the administration’s actions terminating TPS for more than 350,000 people from Haiti and 6,100 from Syria.

The court’s three liberal-leaning justices disagreed with the opinion. It leaves Haitians and Syrians in the US on TPS vulnerable to deportation even if they have applications for other forms of immigration status in progress.

The state department currently warns against traveling to either Haiti or Syria, citing widespread violence, crime, terrorism and ⁠kidnapping.

All countries with a designation allowing TPS in the US are now considered under threat as the ruling will embolden the US president to strip other places of their status, no matter how risky it would be for immigrants to return there.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20260625160759/https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/25/supreme-court-haitians-syrians-temporary-protected-status

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 14 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Trump is shit. The SCOTUS is shit. But this policy of arbitrary protected status for very select groups of immigrations is also shit.

Going back to the Nixon Era, we've had this policy of promising to reform immigration to make it more logical and more practical. At every turn, we invent new special categories and exceptions and weird litmus tests that make the process more and more cumbersome and byzantine. Ronald Reagan wanted to admit a bunch of anti-communist refugees as a fuck-you to the USSR. Bill Clinton wanted a Wet-Foot Dry-Foot policy to cage off certain Cuban migrants and limit their impact on the Florida voter pool. Bush Jr wanted "Guest Worker" visas to flood the labor market with the cheap laborers we'd kept at arms length under NAFTA. Obama wanted DACA exclusively for kids under a certain age, mostly because they were more photogenic than their parents.

We admit people because of some wars and some natural disasters, but deport people because of sudden shifts in foreign policy or a smear campaign by reactionary media. We grant temporary status and then yank it away, because it gives us leverage over foreign espionage agents and business interests. We demand people strictly follow a complex and contradictory set of laws, then arrest them at their Green Card hearings because it's easier than chasing down folks on expired student visas. We deny people citizenship because we don't like their social media history. We admit people because we're enthusiastic about their terminally online shitposts.

It's all garbage and easy for a court to exploit precisely because it's so confused. Rather than establishing a universal standard of basic rights for all residents, we continue to adhere to a tiered system precisely because it offers us an excuse to lock people up en mass, rob them as they try to legally cross the border, and abuse them in custody both at home and in our black sites abroad.

It all fucking sucks. And - in a better world - we'd have a party enthusiastic about wiping the whole board and laying a new universal foundation for human rights both at home and abroad. We won't. But moments like this illustrate why we should.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

It all fucking sucks. And - in a better world - we’d have a party enthusiastic about wiping the whole board and laying a new universal foundation for human rights both at home and abroad. We won’t. But moments like this illustrate why we should.

This is the rub and a "be careful what you wish for" moment. There is a party now enthusiastic about wiping the slate clean and in power right now. Most of us are really against the draconian version that party wants to write on that slate to replace the current piecemeal approach.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

There is a party now enthusiastic about wiping the slate clean and in power right now.

There's a party enthusiastic about doubling down on an already deeply immigrant-hostile domestic policy. The vast majority of what Trump does today is just extensions of policy we had all the way back to the Eisenhower Era of immigration. What he's done is juice up the funding, swell the manpower, and galvenize the border states so that Republican governors/legislatures are willing to play along.

Twenty years ago, you had a handful of these nightmare torture prisons capable of holding thousands of people we didn't like. Now we're building hundreds of prisons to hold millions of people. But the fundamental legislative levers used to identify, arrest, and indefinitely detain people? That's all there under The Patriot Act of '01 and The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of '96 and the Fair Labor Standards Act of '38 (amended under Carter in '77 to criminalize illegal migrant employment).

To "wipe the board", we're talking about tearing up the last century of immigration criminalization. What Trump has done is to tear out all the little legislatively outlined exemptions and dispensations, such that criminalization rules are more explicitly in the hands of the executive branch.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 points 46 minutes ago (1 children)

To “wipe the board”, we’re talking about tearing up the last century of immigration criminalization.

I understand that is your end goal (and my desire as well). The power to do what we want is also the power to make it the horrible trump's version.

That’s all there under The Patriot Act of '01 and The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of '96 and the Fair Labor Standards Act of '38 (amended under Carter in '77 to criminalize illegal migrant employment).

We today, can see the results of all of those and what didn't work and know that a better solution should not include those failed efforts.

What Trump has done is to tear out all the little legislatively outlined exemptions and dispensations, such that criminalization rules are more explicitly in the hands of the executive branch.

I agree. And he's taken that approach because the slow machinery of government doesn't let him simply wipe the slate clean and put his own wholly horrible fascist version of what he wants with full criminalization of any immigrant (even even those born here of immigrant lineage).

The exceptions and workarounds you're citing as the problem are evidence that no one from either side has the ability for fully implement their own version of immigration policy in the USA. Even if we want the power of a a unilateral overhaul decriminalization immigration right now, trump would use that power right now to do the exact opposite.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 45 minutes ago (1 children)

the horrible trump’s version.

Is just the existing immigration system expanded to more people.

And he’s taken that approach because the slow machinery of government doesn’t let him simply wipe the slate clean

Trump doesn't want to eliminate our carceral state. He's quite happy with the function of the government and simply wants to expand it.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 2 points 43 minutes ago* (last edited 42 minutes ago)

Is just the existing immigration system expanded to more people.

If you don't think trump's real desired version isn't worse, I'd question your imagination.

Trump doesn’t want to eliminate our carceral state. He’s quite happy with the function of the government and simply wants to expand it.

trump hates getting stopped or at least slowed by our courts and what few legislative efforts exist to combat him. He would love for all of those to be gone.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 27 minutes ago) (1 children)

Inhuman cruelty; abolish borders.

[–] Shellbeach@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Can I buy a comma or a semi-colon?

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Sure how do you want to send me money if I get 5$ I will edit my post? Or are you just all talk?

[–] Shellbeach@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Bit too steep. $2.50 for a comma, $3 for a semi-colon. Through Wise.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

K private message me your cashapp or venmo and I will request 2.50 and ounce I get it I will add a comma.