STOP USING THE PHRASE UNDERAGE WOMAN.
THESE PIECES OF SHIT ARE RAPING CHILDREN.
this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
100 points (99.0% liked)
politics
30195 readers
2248 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
anyone that words it like that is max sus level
You know, one of these days a family member of a victim is gonna drop one of these people on the street and we're allll gonna have to hear about how violence is never the answer in a just society.
When poor people testify in front of congress, is their personal wealth noted like it is for the super wealthy?
Poor people dont get to testify in front of congress, it is monopoly straight to jail, do not pass go do not collect for those
This Piece of shit’s POS son is a member of The Trump Administration.
I have never paid Epstein for access to women.
Should we clarify that calling it a gratuity does not change the nature of the transaction; still paid.
I have never paid Epstein for access to women
Boys or men it is, then, thanks for clearing it up for us.
No one believes them. They seem more suspect in denying it. Billionaires really aren't very smart at all.
They don't see the problem in raping the children of the poors. We're just chattle to them.
"Underage women". They're called girls, you pedophile.
It's completely possible wealthy people associated with Epstein had nothing to do with the sex trafficking. Maybe they kept it to normal insider trading and fraud stuff.
This guy has been separately accused of rape by multiple women, and though I don't have his full statement, he seems to suggest the release of the Epstein files were bad and caused him to be improperly implicated. I'm gonna guess he didn't just keep it to the fraud stuff.
what the hell did he pay Epstein over $100 million dollars for?!
Maybe he's just a terrible investor that doesn't research what he's investing in.
I mean clearly the pedo parties and girls weren't the main attraction, the global corruption and fraud was, you don't pay a hundred million to have sex with children, that's the afterparty once the deals went through.
Yes, of course we all continue conducting totally legit business with known pedophiles. No problem as long as we don't see it happening to someone we know personally.
